A Comparison of Owner-Assessed Long-Term Outcome of Arthroscopic Intervention versus Conservative Managemento f Dogs with Medial Coronoid Process DiseaseFunding None.
21 June 2018
13 August 2018
15 January 2019 (online)
Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of dogs with medial coronoid process disease (MCPD) treated with arthroscopic intervention versus conservative management.
Materials and Methods Medical records of dogs with MCPD treated by arthroscopic intervention or conservative management over an 8-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Long-term outcome (>12 months) was assessed via owner questionnaire including Liverpool Osteoarthritis in Dogs (LOAD) scores and Canine Brief Pain Inventory scores.
Results Data from 67 clinically affected elbow joints (67 dogs) diagnosed with MCPD on computed tomography were included. Forty-four dogs underwent arthroscopic intervention and 23 dogs were treated with conservative management. The median LOAD and Pain Severity Score (PSS) for dogs in the arthroscopic intervention group compared with the conservatively managed group were not significantly different (p = 0.066 and p = 0.10, respectively). The median Pain Interference Score (PIS) was significantly higher in the arthroscopic intervention group versus the conservative management group (p = 0.028). There was no significant difference after controlling for age. For LOAD, PSS and PIS, older age at diagnosis was all significantly associated with higher scores (p = 0.048, p = 0.026 and p = 0.046, respectively) and older age at time of questionnaire completion showed a stronger association with the scores (p ≤0.001 for all).
Clinical Significance Arthroscopic intervention showed no long-term benefit over conservative management for dogs with MCPD.
Keywordsmedial coronoid process disease - dogs - arthroscopy - conservative management - clinical metrology instrument
All authors contributed to conception of study, study design, acquisition of data and data analysis and interpretation. All authors drafted, revised and approved the submitted manuscript.
* Dr. Dempsey conducted the study at the Institute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Wirral, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
- 1 Olsson SE. The early diagnosis of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the canine elbow joint. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1983; 19: 616-626
- 2 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R, Smith T, Schulz K. Techniques of application and initial clinical experience with sliding humeral osteotomy for treatment of medial compartment disease of the canine elbow. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (02) 261-278
- 3 Guthrie S, Plummer JM, Vaughan LC. Aetiopathogenesis of canine elbow osteochondrosis: a study of loose fragments removed at arthrotomy. Res Vet Sci 1992; 52 (03) 284-291
- 4 Danielson KC, Fitzpatrick N, Muir P, Manley PA. Histomorphometry of fragmented medial coronoid process in dogs: a comparison of affected and normal coronoid processes. Vet Surg 2006; 35 (06) 501-509
- 5 Kirberger RM, Fourie SL. Elbow dysplasia in the dog: pathophysiology, diagnosis and control. J S Afr Vet Assoc 1998; 69 (02) 43-54
- 6 Gemmill TJ, Clements DN. Fragmented coronoid process in the dog: is there a role for incongruency?. J Small Anim Pract 2007; 48 (07) 361-368
- 7 Read RA, Armstrong SJ, O'Keefe JD. Fragmentation of the medial coronoid process of the ulna in dogs: a study of 109 cases. J Small Anim Pract 1990; 31 (07) 330-334
- 8 Fitzpatrick N, Smith TJ, Evans RB, Yeadon R. Radiographic and arthroscopic findings in the elbow joints of 263 dogs with medial coronoid disease. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (02) 213-223
- 9 Caron A, Fitzpatrick N. Bi-oblique dynamic proximal ulnar osteotomy: surgical technique and clinical outcome in 86 dogs. Vet Surg 2016; 45 (03) 356-363
- 10 McConkey MJ, Valenzano DM, Wei A. , et al. Effect of the proximal abducting ulnar osteotomy on intra-articular pressure distribution and contact mechanics of congruent and incongruent canine elbows ex vivo. Vet Surg 2016; 45 (03) 347-355
- 11 Fitzpatrick N, Bertran J, Solano MA. Sliding humeral osteotomy: medium-term objective outcome measures and reduction of complications with a modified technique. Vet Surg 2015; 44 (02) 137-149
- 12 Cook JL, Schulz KS, Karnes GJ. , et al. Clinical outcomes associated with the initial use of the Canine Unicompartmental Elbow (CUE) Arthroplasty System(®). Can Vet J 2015; 56 (09) 971-977
- 13 Wilson DM, Goh CS, Palmer RH. Arthroscopic biceps ulnar release procedure (BURP): technique description and in vitro assessment of the association of visual control and surgeon experience to regional damage and tenotomy completeness. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (06) 734-740
- 14 Burton NJ, Dobney JA, Owen MR, Colborne GR. Joint angle, moment and power compensations in dogs with fragmented medial coronoid process. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (02) 110-118
- 15 Brown DC, Boston RC, Farrar JT. Use of an activity monitor to detect response to treatment in dogs with osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2010; 237 (01) 66-70
- 16 Cimino Brown D. What can we learn from osteoarthritis pain in companion animals?. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2017; 35 (5, Suppl 107): 53-58
- 17 Brown DC, Boston RC, Coyne JC, Farrar JT. Ability of the canine brief pain inventory to detect response to treatment in dogs with osteoarthritis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 233 (08) 1278-1283
- 18 Hercock CA, Pinchbeck G, Giejda A, Clegg PD, Innes JF. Validation of a client-based clinical metrology instrument for the evaluation of canine elbow osteoarthritis. J Small Anim Pract 2009; 50 (06) 266-271
- 19 Burton NJ, Owen MR, Kirk LS, Toscano MJ, Colborne GR. Conservative versus arthroscopic management for medial coronoid process disease in dogs: a prospective gait evaluation. Vet Surg 2011; 40 (08) 972-980
- 20 Reichle JK, Park RD, Bahr AM. Computed tomographic findings of dogs with cubital joint lameness. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2000; 41 (02) 125-130
- 21 De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, van Bree H, Simoens PJ. Computed tomography of the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63 (10) 1400-1407
- 22 International Elbow Working Group. Canine elbow dysplasia- CT based assessment and grading. Annual Meeting, Vienna, Austria, 2016
- 23 Draffan D, Carrera I, Carmichael S, Heller J, Hammond G. Radiographic analysis of trochlear notch sclerosis in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis secondary to medial coronoid disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22 (01) 7-15
- 24 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H, Simoens P. Elbow arthroscopy in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54 (01) 191-198
- 25 Galindo-Zamora V, Dziallas P, Wolf DC. , et al. Evaluation of thoracic limb loads, elbow movement, and morphology in dogs before and after arthroscopic management of unilateral medial coronoid process disease. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (07) 819-828
- 26 Huibregtse BA, Johnson AL, Muhlbauer MC. The effect of treatment of fragmented medial coronoid process on the development of osteoarthritis of the elbow. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1994; 30: 190-195
- 27 Evans RB, Gordon-Evans WJ, Conzemius MG. Comparison of three methods for the management of fragmented medial coronoid process in the dog. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (02) 106-109
- 28 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Langhann A, Fehr M. , et al. Arthrotomy verses arthroscopy in the treatment of the fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna (FCP) in 421 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16 (04) 204-210
- 29 Bouck GR, Miller CW, Taves CL. A comparison of surgical and medical treatment of fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the canine elbow. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1995; 8: 177-183
- 30 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Fehr M, Nolte I. Co-existence of ununited anconeal process and fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47 (02) 61-65
- 31 Gemmill TJ, Mellor DJ, Clements DN. , et al. Evaluation of elbow incongruency using reconstructed CT in dogs suffering fragmented coronoid process. J Small Anim Pract 2005; 46 (07) 327-333
- 32 Felson DT, Goggins J, Niu J, Zhang Y, Hunter DJ. The effect of body weight on progression of knee osteoarthritis is dependent on alignment. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50 (12) 3904-3909
- 33 German AJ, Hervera M, Hunter L. , et al. Improvement in insulin resistance and reduction in plasma inflammatory adipokines after weight loss in obese dogs. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2009; 37 (04) 214-226
- 34 Carpenter LG, Schwarz PD, Lowry JE, Park RD, Steyn PF. Comparison of radiologic imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented medial coronoid process of the cubital joint in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203 (01) 78-83
- 35 Moores AP, Benigni L, Lamb CR. Computed tomography versus arthroscopy for detection of canine elbow dysplasia lesions. Vet Surg 2008; 37 (04) 390-398
- 36 Villamonte-Chevalier A, van Bree H, Broeckx B. , et al. Assessment of medial coronoid disease in 180 canine lame elbow joints: a sensitivity and specificity comparison of radiographic, computed tomographic and arthroscopic findings. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 243
- 37 Farrell M, Heller J, Solano M, Fitzpatrick N, Sparrow T, Kowaleski M. Does radiographic arthrosis correlate with cartilage pathology in Labrador Retrievers affected by medial coronoid process disease?. Vet Surg 2014; 43 (02) 155-165
- 38 Goldhammer MA, Smith SH, Fitzpatrick N, Clements DN. A comparison of radiographic, arthroscopic and histological measures of articular pathology in the canine elbow joint. Vet J 2010; 186 (01) 96-103
- 39 Eljack H, Böttcher P. Relationship between axial radioulnar incongruence with cartilage damage in dogs with medial coronoid disease. Vet Surg 2015; 44 (02) 174-179
- 40 van der Kraan PM, van den Berg WB. Osteophytes: relevance and biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15 (03) 237-244
- 41 Vermote KA, Bergenhuyzen AL, Gielen I, van Bree H, Duchateau L, Van Ryssen B. Elbow lameness in dogs of six years and older: arthroscopic and imaging findings of medial coronoid disease in 51 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23 (01) 43-50
- 42 Griffon. Surgical diseases of the elbow. In: Tobias KM, Johnston SA. , eds., Vol.1. Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. 1st edition. St Louis, MO: Elsevier Inc.; 2012: 724-759