Accuracy of Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Cardiac Malformations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of the diagnosis of fetal heart diseases obtained through ultrasound examinations performed during the prenatal period compared with the postnatal evaluation.

Methods A retrospective cohort study with 96 pregnant women who were attended at the Echocardiography Service and whose deliveries occurred at the Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Risk factor assessment plus sensitivity and specificity analysis were used, comparing the accuracy of the screening for congenital heart disease by means of obstetrical ultrasound and morphological evaluation and fetal echocardiography, considering p < 0.05 as significant. The present study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institution.

Results The analysis of risk factors shows that 31.3% of the fetuses with congenital heart disease could be identified by anamnesis. The antepartum echocardiography demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.7%, a specificity of 88.9%, and accuracy of 93% in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease. A sensitivity of 29.3% was found for the obstetric ultrasound, of 54.3% for the morphological ultrasound, and of 97.7% for the fetal echocardiography. The fetal echocardiography detected fetal heart disease in 67.7% of the cases, the morphological ultrasound in 16.7%, and the obstetric ultrasound in 11.5% of the cases.

Conclusion There is a high proportion of congenital heart disease in pregnancies with no risk factors for this outcome. Faced with the disappointing results of obstetric ultrasound for the detection of congenital heart diseases and the current unfeasibility of universal screening of congenital heart diseases through fetal echocardiography, the importance of the fetal morphological ultrasound and its performance by qualified professionals is reinforced for a more appropriate management of these pregnancies.

Resumo

Objetivo Avaliar a acurácia do diagnóstico de cardiopatias congênitas obtidos por meio das ecografias realizadas durante o pré-natal comparativamente à avaliação pós-natal.

Métodos Estudo de coorte retrospectivo com 96 gestantes atendidas no Serviço de Ecocardiografia cujos partos ocorreram no Complexo Hospitalar Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil. Utilizou-se a avaliação de fatores de risco e a análise de sensibilidade e especificidade, comparando-se a acurácia do rastreamento de cardiopatia congênita por meio da ecografia obstétrica, da avaliação morfológica e da ecocardiografia fetal, considerando-se como significativo um p < 0,05. O referido estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da Instituição.

Resultados A análise de fatores de risco demonstra que 31,3% dos fetos com cardiopatia congênita poderiam ser identificados pela anamnese. As ecografias anteparto possuem sensibilidade de 97,7%, especificidade de 88,9% e acurácia de 93,0% no diagnóstico da cardiopatia congênita. Ao se analisar cada tipo de ecografia separadamente, encontrou-se sensibilidade de 29,3% para a ecografia obstétrica, de 54,3% para ecografia morfológica, e de 97,7% para ecocardiografia fetal. A ecocardiografia fetal definiu a cardiopatia fetal em 67,7% dos casos, a ecografia morfológica em 16,7%, e a ecografia obstétrica em 11,5%.

Conclusão Demonstra-se uma elevada proporção de cardiopatia congênita em gestações sem fatores de risco para esse desfecho. Frente aos resultados desanimadores da ecografia obstétrica para a detecção de cardiopatias congênitas e na atual inviabilidade de rastreamento universal de cardiopatias congênitas por meio da ecocardiografia fetal, reforça-se a importância da ecografia morfológica fetal e sua realização por profissionais qualificados para esse fim de forma a permitir o manejo mais adequado destas gestações.

Keywords

fetal heart disease - fetal echocardiography - morphological sonography

Palavras-chave

cardiopatia fetal - ecocardiografia fetal - ecografia morfológica

Contributors

Pinheiro D. O., Varisco B. B., Silva M. B., Duarte R. S., Deliberali G. D., Maia C. R., Jiménez M. F., and El Beitune P. designed the study, analyzed and interpreted the data, wrote the article and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

• References

• 1 Lopes L. Ecocardiografia Fetal. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Revinter; 2016.
• 2 Donofrio MT, Moon-Grady AJ, Hornberger LK. , et al; American Heart Association Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Joint Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129 (21) 2183-2242
• 3 Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39 (12) 1890-1900
• 4 Moons P, Sluysmans T, De Wolf D. , et al. Congenital heart disease in 111 225 births in Belgium: birth prevalence, treatment and survival in the 21st century. Acta Paediatr 2009; 98 (03) 472-477
• 5 Linask KK, Han M, Bravo-Valenzuela NJM. Changes in vitelline and utero-placental hemodynamics: implications for cardiovascular development. Front Physiol 2014; 5: 390
• 6 Landis BJ, Levey A, Levasseur SM. , et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease and birth outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol 2013; 34 (03) 597-605
• 7 Nayak K, Chandra G S N, Shetty R, Narayan PK. Evaluation of fetal echocardiography as a routine antenatal screening tool for detection of congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2016; 6 (01) 44-49
• 8 Wald RM, Tham EB, McCrindle BW. , et al. Outcome after prenatal diagnosis of tricuspid atresia: a multicenter experience. Am Heart J 2007; 153 (05) 772-778
• 9 Durand I, Deverriere G, Thill C. , et al. Prenatal detection of coarctation of the aorta in a non-selected population: a prospective analysis of 10 years of experience. Pediatr Cardiol 2015; 36 (06) 1248-1254
• 10 Crawford DC, Chita SK, Allan LD. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease: factors affecting obstetric management and survival. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988; 159 (02) 352-356
• 11 D'Alton ME, DeCherney AH. Prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 1993; 328 (02) 114-120
• 12 Obu HA, Chinawa JM, Uleanya ND, Adimora GN, Obi IE. Congenital malformations among newborns admitted in the neonatal unit of a tertiary hospital in Enugu, South-East Nigeria--a retrospective study. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 177
• 13 Ali A, Zahad S, Masoumeh A, Azar A. Congenital malformations among live births at Arvand Hospital, Ahwaz Iran – a prospective study. Pak J Med Sci 2008; 24: 33-37
• 14 Jaeggi ET, Sholler GF, Jones OD, Cooper SG. Comparative analysis of pattern, management and outcome of pre- versus postnatally diagnosed major congenital heart disease: a population-based study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 17 (05) 380-385
• 15 Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Reddy VM, Brook MM, Hanley FL, Silverman NH. Improved surgical outcome after fetal diagnosis of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2001; 103 (09) 1269-1273
• 16 Verheijen PM, Lisowski LA, Stoutenbeek P. , et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease affects preoperative acidosis in the newborn patient. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121 (04) 798-803
• 17 Friedberg MK, Silverman NH, Moon-Grady AJ. , et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2009; 155 (01) 26-31, 31.e1
• 18 Randall P, Brealey S, Hahn S, Khan KS, Parsons JM. Accuracy of fetal echocardiography in the routine detection of congenital heart disease among unselected and low risk populations: a systematic review. BJOG 2005; 112 (01) 24-30
• 19 Buskens E, Grobbee DE, Frohn-Mulder IM. , et al. Efficacy of routine fetal ultrasound screening for congenital heart disease in normal pregnancy. Circulation 1996; 94 (01) 67-72
• 20 Khoo NS, Van Essen P, Richardson M, Robertson T. Effectiveness of prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects in South Australia: a population analysis 1999-2003. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48 (06) 559-563
• 21 Sekar P, Heydarian HC, Cnota JF, Hornberger LK, Michelfelder EC. Diagnosis of congenital heart disease in an era of universal prenatal ultrasound screening in southwest Ohio. Cardiol Young 2015; 25 (01) 35-41
• 22 Sandor GG, Farquarson D, Wittmann B, Chow TC, Lau AE. Fetal echocardiography: results in high-risk patients. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67 (03) 358-364
• 23 Richmond S, Atkins J. A population-based study of the prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformation over 16 years. BJOG 2005; 112 (10) 1349-1357
• 24 Rajangam S, Devi R. Consanguinity and chromosomal abnormality in mental retardation and or multiple congenital anomaly. J Anat Soc India 2007; 56: 30-33
• 25 Queisser-Luft A, Stolz G, Wiesel A, Schlaefer K, Spranger J. Malformations in newborn: results based on 30,940 infants and fetuses from the Mainz congenital birth defect monitoring system (1990-1998). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2002; 266 (03) 163-167
• 26 Trines J, Hornberger LK. Evolution of heart disease in utero. Pediatr Cardiol 2004; 25 (03) 287-298
• 27 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32 (06) 1083-1101
• 28 Sun HY, Proudfoot JA, McCandless RT. Prenatal detection of critical cardiac outflow tract anomalies remains suboptimal despite revised obstetrical imaging guidelines. Congenit Heart Dis 2018 •••:;
• 29 Carvalho JS, Allan LD, Chaoui R. , et al; International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 (03) 348-359