PDF herunterladen
Digestive Disease Interventions 2018; 02(04): 383-387
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675753
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Surgical Endoscopy: Future Directions

Megan Sippey
1   Department of Surgery, Case Western / University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Wanda Lam
1   Department of Surgery, Case Western / University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Ahmed Ali
1   Department of Surgery, Case Western / University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Jeffrey Marks
1   Department of Surgery, Case Western / University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

31. August 2018

14. September 2018

Publikationsdatum:
28. November 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Since the introduction of the modern endoscope in 1957, numerous advances have been made in its use. The endoscope has transitioned from a primarily diagnostic tool at its inception, to now offering a plethora of therapeutic interventions including Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). Advances in the endoscope, endoscopic imaging modalities, and therapeutic tools and platforms have contributed to recent, and upcoming, progression in NOTES. Current states of these advancements are reviewed.

Keywords

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery - novel endoscopic technology - robotic endoscopy
 

  • References

  • 1 Gluck N, Fishman S, Melhem A, Goldfarb S, Halpern Z, Santo E. A novel colonoscope with panoramic visualization detected more simulated polyps than conventional colonoscopy in a live swine model. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3 (06) E642-E645
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Gluck N, Melhem A, Halpern Z, Mergener K, Santo E. A novel self-propelled disposable colonoscope is effective for colonoscopy in humans (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83 (05) 998-1004.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Shike M, Fireman Z, Eliakim R. , et al. Sightline ColonoSight system for a disposable, power-assisted, non-fiber-optic colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68 (04) 701-710
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Rösch T, Adler A, Pohl H. , et al. A motor-driven single-use colonoscope controlled with a hand-held device: a feasibility study in volunteers. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67 (07) 1139-1146
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Groth S, Rex DK, Rösch T, Hoepffner N. High cecal intubation rates with a new computer-assisted colonoscope: a feasibility study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106 (06) 1075-1080
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Eickhoff A, van Dam J, Jakobs R. , et al. Computer-assisted colonoscopy (the NeoGuide Endoscopy System): results of the first human clinical trial (“PACE study”). Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102 (02) 261-266
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Trivedi PJ, Braden B. Indications, stains and techniques in chromoendoscopy. QJM 2013; 106 (02) 117-131
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 ASGE Technology Committee. Confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80 (06) 928-938
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Filip M, Iordache S, Săftoiu A, Ciurea T. Autofluorescence imaging and magnification endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17 (01) 9-14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Ragunath K. Autofluorescence endoscopy--not much gain after all?. Endoscopy 2007; 39 (11) 1021-1022
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Stavropoulos SN, Modayil R, Friedel D. Current applications of endoscopic suturing. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7 (08) 777-789
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Atallah S, Hodges A, Larach SW. Direct target NOTES: prospective applications for next generation robotic platforms. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22 (05) 363-371
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, Choudhury SA, Oleynikov D. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc 2018; 32 (04) 1636-1655
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Mattheis S, Hasskamp P, Holtmann L. , et al. Flex Robotic system in transoral robotic surgery: the first 40 patients. Head Neck 2017; 39 (03) 471-475
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Tan Wen Sheng B, Wong P, Teo Ee Hoon C. Transoral robotic excision of laryngeal papillomas with Flex® Robotic System - a novel surgical approach. Am J Otolaryngol 2018; 39 (03) 355-358
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Paull JO, Pudalov N, Obias V. Medrobotics FLEX transanal excision of a rectal GIST: first video of transanal Flex robot used in a human – video vignette. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20 (11) 1048-1049
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Yeung BPM, Gourlay T. A technical review of flexible endoscopic multitasking platforms. Int J Surg 2012; 10 (07) 345-354
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Modayil R, Stavropoulos SN. A Western perspective on “new NOTES” from POEM to full-thickness resection and beyond. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2016; 26 (02) 413-432
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lebares C, Swanstrom LL. Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP). Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2016; 26 (02) 257-270
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Demetri GD, von Mehren M, Antonescu CR. , et al. NCCN task force report: update on the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010; 08: S1-S41
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Masaki T. Current status and future perspectives of endoscopic full-thickness resection. Dig Endosc 2018; 30 (01) (Suppl. 01) 25-31
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Abe N, Takeuchi H, Ohki A, Hashimoto Y, Mori T, Sugiyama M. Comparison between endoscopic and laparoscopic removal of gastric submucosal tumor. Dig Endosc 2018; 30 (01) (Suppl. 01) 7-16
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Richter JE, Kumar A, Lipka S, Miladinovic B, Velanovich V. Efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication vs transoral incisionless fundoplication or proton pump inhibitors in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2018; 154 (05) 1298-1308.e7
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Trad KS, Barnes WE, Prevou ER. , et al. The TEMPO trial at 5 years: transoral fundoplication 2.0 is safe, durable, and cost-effective. Surg Innov 2018; 25 (02) 149-157
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Gersin KS, Keller JE, Stefanidis D. , et al. Duodenal- jejunal bypass sleeve: a totally endoscopic device for the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Innov 2007; 14 (04) 275-278
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Madan AK, Tichansky DS, Khan KA. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic gastric bypass performed in a cadaver. Obes Surg 2008; 18 (09) 1192-1199
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Fogel R, De Fogel J, Bonilla Y, De La Fuente R. Clinical experience of transoral suturing for an endoluminal vertical gastroplasty: 1-year follow-up in 64 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68 (01) 51-58
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Takamizawa S, Yamanouchi E, Muraji T, Nishijima E, Satoh S, Tsugawa J. MCRA of an anastomotic stenosis after esophagoesophagostomy for long gap esophageal atresia: a case report. J Pediatr Surg 2007; 42 (05) 769-772
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Zaritzky M, Ben R, Zylberg GI, Yampolsky B. Magnetic compression anastomosis as a nonsurgical treatment for esophageal atresia. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39 (09) 945-949
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Dorman RM, Vali K, Harmon CM, Zaritzky M, Bass KD. Repair of esophageal atresia with proximal fistula using endoscopic magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis) after staged lengthening. Pediatr Surg Int 2016; 32 (05) 525-528
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 31 Matsuura R, Ueno T, Tazuke Y. , et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis for postoperative biliary atresia. Pediatr Int 2017; 59 (06) 737-739
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Graves CE, Co C, Hsi RS. , et al. Magnetic compression anastomosis (magnamosis): first-in-human trial. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225 (05) 676-681.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Sullivan S, Edmundowicz SA, Thompson CC. Endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies: new and emerging technologies. Gastroenterology 2017; 152 (07) 1791-1801
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar