J Neurol Surg B 2019; 80(04): 364-370
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675231
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Supratentorial and Infratentorial Approaches to Pineal Surgery: A Database Analysis

David M. Rosenberg
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Brett W. Geever
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Akash S. Patel
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Anisse N. Chaker
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Abhiraj D. Bhimani
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Pouyan Kheirkhah
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Jonathan G. Hobbs
2  Section of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Darian R. Esfahani
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
,
Ankit I. Mehta
1  Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding The authors have not received any funding for this work.
Further Information

Publication History

25 May 2018

10 September 2018

Publication Date:
25 October 2018 (eFirst)

Abstract

Objectives Neoplasms involving the pineal gland are rare. When they do occur, tumor resection is anatomically challenging and is traditionally addressed by either a supratentorial or an infratentorial approach. To date, no large, multicenter studies have been performed that systematically analyze outcomes comparing these two approaches. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing pineal neoplasm resection, comparing supratentorial and infratentorial approaches.

Design Retrospective database review.

Setting Multi-institutional database.

Participants From 2005 to 2016, 60 patients were identified, with 13 undergoing a supratentorial approach and 47 undergoing an infratentorial approach.

Main Outcome Measures Patient demographics, comorbidities, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were investigated using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographics, readmission, reoperation, and complication rates were analyzed and compared with previous studies.

Results Patient demographics were similar between these two groups. The overall complication rates for the supratentorial and infratentorial approaches were 30.8 and 17%, respectively, and the difference was not statistically significant. The most common medical complications encountered were respiratory and hematological.

Conclusion As the first multi-institutional database analysis of approaches to the pineal gland, this study provides an analysis of patient demographics, comorbidities, and postoperative complications. After controlling for preoperative risk factors and demographic characteristics, no statistically significant differences in postoperative outcomes were found between infratentorial and supratentorial approaches. The mean readmission, reoperation, and complication rates were found to be 2.1, 8.3, and 20%, respectively. The lack of significant difference between approaches suggests that clinical decision-making should depend upon anatomical considerations and physician preference, although the complications illustrated here may provide some preoperative guidance.

Supplementary Material