CC BY 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2018; 40(11): 713-721
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675214
Review Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Evaluation of Preeclampsia Results after Use of Metformin in Gestation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Avaliação dos resultados da pré-eclâmpsia após o uso da metformina na gestação: revisão sistemática e metanálise
Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento
1   Department of Postgraduate in Health and Environment, Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Brazil
,
Guilherme Dienstmann
1   Department of Postgraduate in Health and Environment, Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Brazil
,
Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza
1   Department of Postgraduate in Health and Environment, Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Brazil
,
Raquel Fleig
1   Department of Postgraduate in Health and Environment, Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Brazil
,
Carla Beatriz Pimentel Cesar Hoffmann
1   Department of Postgraduate in Health and Environment, Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Brazil
,
Jean Carl Silva
1   Department of Postgraduate in Health and Environment, Universidade da Região de Joinville, Joinville, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 June 2018

08 August 2018

Publication Date:
06 November 2018 (online)

Abstract

Objective Does the use of metformin have an influence on the outcomes of preeclampsia (PE)?

Sources of Data The descriptors pregnancy, metformin, treatment, and preeclampsia associated with the Boolean operators AND and OR were found in the MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase and Cochrane databases. A flowchart with exclusion criteria and inclusion strategy using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, and eligibility criteria was used. Data were extracted regarding the type of study, the applied dosage, treatment time, segment, bias risks, and the Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) strategy to identify the quality of the study.

Selection of Studies Total number of journals in the initial search (n = 824); exclusions from repeated articles on different search engines (n = 253); exclusions after reading the titles, when the title had no correlations with the proposed theme (n = 164); exclusions due to incompatibility with the criteria established in the methodological analysis (n = 185), exclusion of articles with lower correlation with the objective of the present study (n = 187); and final bibliographic selection (n = 35).

Data Collection At first, a systematic review of the literature was performed. Subsequently, from the main selection, randomized and non-randomized trials with metformin that presented their results in absolute and relative numbers of PE outcomes were selected. The variables were treated statistically in the meta-analysis with the Review Manager software (RevMan), version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Denmark in the Hovedistaden region.

Synthesis of Data The study showed that metmorfin presented greater preventive effects for pregnancy-induced hypertension and was less effective for PE.

Conclusion Metformin may gain place in preventive treatments for PE, once the dosages, the gestational age, and treatment time are particularly evaluated. A methodological strategy with an improved perspective of innovative and/or carefully progressive dosages during pregnancy to avoid side effects and the possibility of maternal-fetal risks is suggested.

Resumo

Objetivo O uso de metformina tem influência nos resultados da pré-eclâmpsia (PE)?

Fontes de Dados Os descritores gravidez, metformina, tratamento e pré-eclâmpsia associados aos operadores booleanos AND e OR foram encontrados nas bases de dados MEDLINE, LILACS, Embase e Cochrane. Foi utilizado um fluxograma com critérios de exclusão e estratégia de inclusão, utilizando o protocolo Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA e critérios de elegibilidade. Os dados foram extraídos quanto ao tipo de estudo, dosagem aplicada, duração do tratamento, segmento, riscos de viés e estratégia Patient, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) para identificar a qualidade do estudo.

Seleção de Estudos Número total de periódicos na busca inicialmente realizada (n = 824); exclusões de artigos repetidos nos diferentes sites de busca (n = 253); exclusões após a leitura dos títulos, quando o titulo não apresentava correlações com o tema proposto (n = 164); exclusões por incompatibilidade com os critérios estabelecidos na análise metodológica (n = 185), exclusão de artigos com menor correlação com o objetivo do presente estudo (n = 187); e seleção bibliográfica final (n = 35).

Coleta de Dados Inicialmente, foi realizada uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Posteriormente, a partir da seleção principal, foram selecionados estudos randomizados e não randomizados com metformina, os quais apresentaram em seus resultados números absolutos e relativos de desfechos de PE. As variáveis foram tratadas estatisticamente na metanálise por meio do Review Manager software (RevMan), version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Denmark in the Hovedistaden region.

Síntese dos Dados O estudo demonstrou que a metmorfina apresenta maiores efeitos preventivos para a hipertensão induzida pela gravidez e é menos eficaz para a PE.

Conclusão A metformina pode conquistar seu espaço nos tratamentos preventivos da PE, uma vez que as dosagens, a idade gestacional e o tempo de tratamento são particularmente avaliados. Sugere-se uma estratégia metodológica com uma perspectiva aprimorada de doses inovadoras e/ou cuidadosamente progressivas durante a gravidez, a fim de evitar efeitos colaterais e a possibilidade de riscos materno-fetais.

 
  • Referências

  • 1 Costa AAR, Ribas MSSS, Amorim MMR, Santos LC. Maternal mortality in Recife. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2002; 24: 455-462 Doi: 10.1590/S0100-72032002000700005
  • 2 Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183 (01) S1-S22 Doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107928
  • 3 Romero R, Erez O, Hüttemann M. , et al. Metformin, the aspirin of the 21st century: its role in gestational diabetes mellitus, prevention of preeclampsia and cancer, and the promotion of longevity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217 (03) 282-302 Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.003
  • 4 Dempsey JC, Williams MA, Leisenring WM, Shy K, Luthy DA. Maternal birth weight in relation to plasma lipid concentrations in early pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190 (05) 1359-1368 Doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.10.710
  • 5 Silva JC, Amaral AR, Ferreira BD, Petry JF, Silva MR, Krelling PC. [Obesity during pregnancy: gestational complications and birth outcomes]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2014; 36 (11) 509-513 Doi: 10.1590/S0100-720320140005024
  • 6 Kim YD, Park KG, Lee YS. , et al. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis through AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent regulation of the orphan nuclear receptor SHP. Diabetes 2008; 57 (02) 306-314 Doi: 10.2337/db07-0381
  • 7 Hanem LGE, Stridsklev S, Júlíusson PB. , et al. Metformin use in PCOS pregnancies increases the risk of offspring overweight at 4 years of age: follow-up of two RCTs. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 103 (04) 1612-1621 Doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02419
  • 8 Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Mullan RJ. , et al. Adverse effects of the common treatments for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98 (12) 4646-4654 Doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2374
  • 9 Nawaz FH, Khalid R, Naru T, Rizvi J. Does continuous use of metformin throughout pregnancy improve pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome?. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34 (05) 832-837 Doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2008.00856.x
  • 10 Khattab S, Mohsen IA, Aboul Foutouh I. , et al. Can metformin reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome? Prospective cohort study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2011; 27 (10) 789-793 Doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.540600
  • 11 Syngelaki A, Nicolaides KH, Balani J. , et al. Metformin versus placebo in obese pregnant women without diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (05) 434-443 Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509819
  • 12 Fujita D, Tanabe A, Sekijima T. , et al. Role of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and AKT cascades in regulating hypoxia-induced angiogenic factors produced by a trophoblast-derived cell line. J Endocrinol 2010; 206 (01) 131-140 Doi: 10.1677/JOE-10-0027
  • 13 Galvão TF, Pansani TSA, Harrad D. Principais itens para relatar revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises: a recomendação PRISMA. Epidemiol Serv Saude 2015; 24: 335-342 Doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742015000200017
  • 14 Stone PW. Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res. 2002; 15 (03) 197-198 . PMID: 12173172
  • 15 Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. London: Cochrane; 2011
  • 16 Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327 (7414): 557-560 Doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  • 17 Chiswick C, Reynolds RM, Denison F. , et al. Effect of metformin on maternal and fetal outcomes in obese pregnant women (EMPOWaR): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015; 3 (10) 778-786 Doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00219-3
  • 18 Nawaz FH, Rizvi J. Continuation of metformin reduces early pregnancy loss in obese Pakistani women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2010; 69 (03) 184-189 Doi: 10.1159/000268051
  • 19 El Hameed AAA, Shreif HE, Mowafy HE. The role of continuing metformin therapy during pregnancy in the reduction of gestational diabetes and improving pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2011; 16: 204-208 Doi: 10.1016/j.mefs.2011.04.002
  • 20 Vanky E, Salvesen KÅ, Heimstad R, Fougner KJ, Romundstad P, Carlsen SM. Metformin reduces pregnancy complications without affecting androgen levels in pregnant polycystic ovary syndrome women: results of a randomized study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (08) 1734-1740 Doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh347
  • 21 Vanky E, Stridsklev S, Heimstad R. , et al. Metformin versus placebo from first trimester to delivery in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, controlled multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95 (12) E448-E455 Doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0853
  • 22 Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP. ; MiG Trial Investigators. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (19) 2003-2015 Doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707193
  • 23 Tertti K, Ekblad U, Koskinen P, Vahlberg T, Rönnemaa T. Metformin vs. insulin in gestational diabetes. A randomized study characterizing metformin patients needing additional insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013; 15 (03) 246-251 Doi: 10.1111/dom.12017
  • 24 Niromanesh S, Alavi A, Sharbaf FR, Amjadi N, Moosavi S, Akbari S. Metformin compared with insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012; 98 (03) 422-429 Doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.031
  • 25 Paglia MJ, Coustan DR. The use of oral antidiabetic medications in gestational diabetes mellitus. Curr Diab Rep 2009; 9 (04) 287-290 Doi: 10.1007/s11892-009-0044-3
  • 26 Zhao LP, Sheng XY, Zhou S. , et al. Metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 80 (05) 1224-1234 Doi: 10.1111/bcp.12672
  • 27 Hughes RC, Gardiner SJ, Begg EJ, Zhang M. Effect of pregnancy on the pharmacokinetics of metformin. Diabet Med 2006; 23 (03) 323-326 Doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01769.x
  • 28 Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2003; 81: 19-25 Doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.10.004
  • 29 Silva RdoC, Pardini DP, Kater CE. Síndrome dos ovários policísticos, síndrome metabólica, risco cardiovascular e o papel dos agentes sensibilizadores da insulina. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2006; 50 (02) 281-290 Doi: 10.1590/S0004-27302006000200014
  • 30 Boomsma CM, Eijkemans MJ, Hughes EG, Visser GH, Fauser BC, Macklon NS. A meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12 (06) 673-683 Doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml036
  • 31 Gui J, Liu Q, Feng L. Metformin vs insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8 (05) e64585 Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064585
  • 32 Su DF, Wang XY. Metformin vs insulin in the management of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 104 (03) 353-357 Doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.12.056
  • 33 Ainuddin JA, Karim N, Zaheer S, Ali SS, Hasan AA. Metformin treatment in type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: an active controlled, parallel-group, randomized, open label study in patients with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy. J Diabetes Res 2015; 2015 (15) 325851
  • 34 Salihu HM, Lynch O, Alio AP, Kornosky JL, Clayton HB, Mbah AK. Extreme obesity and risk of placental abruption. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (02) 438-444 Doi: 10.1093/humrep/den421
  • 35 Weissgerber TL, Mudd LM. Preeclampsia and diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2015; 15 (03) 9 Doi: 10.1007/s11892-015-0579-4