PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2018; 06(03): 145-152
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673701
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Effects of a Standard Postoperative Rehabilitation Protocol for Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair on Pain, Function, and Health Perception

Roberta Monesi
1   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
,
Maria Grazia Benedetti
1   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
,
Alessandro Zati
1   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
,
Daniela Vigna
1   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
,
Domenico Romanello
1   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
,
Alberto Monello
1   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
,
Roberto Rotini
2   Division of Shoulder and Elbow Orthopedic, IRCCS-Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

04. Dezember 2017

27. August 2018

Publikationsdatum:
31. Oktober 2018 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Purpose There is still conflicting evidence to support postoperative rehabilitation protocols using immobilization following rotator cuff repair over early motion. The objective of the study was to evaluate the evolution of pain, shoulder function, and patients' perception of their health status up to 1 year after cuff rotator repair and a standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol consisting of 4 weeks of immobilization followed by a 2-week assisted controlled rehabilitation.

Methods Descriptive, longitudinal, uncontrolled case-series study was performed on 49 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair following traumatic or degenerative lesions. VAS scale for pain, Constant–Murley score for function, and SF-12 score for quality of life were used as outcome measures and were administered before the rehabilitation treatment, at the end of the 2-week rehabilitation, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery.

Results VAS pain score decreased significantly along the follow-up reaching almost a nil value after 1 year (0.2). Function as measured by Constant–Murley score had a significant improvement during follow-up, reaching a mean value of 84.6. The short form (SF)-12 score increased over time reaching 46.3 for the physical and 43.8 for the psychological dimension, respectively, at 1 year.

Conclusion The present study confirmed an excellent outcome at 1 year after rotator cuff repair using a traditional 4-week immobilization followed by a 2-week rehabilitation protocol without evidence of tendon un-healing or re-tearing.

Level of Evidence This is a level IV, therapeutic case series.

Keywords

pain - rotator cuff - repair - arthroscopy - rehabilitation
 

  • References

  • 1 Coghlan JA, Buchbinder R, Green S, Johnston RV, Bell SN. Surgery for rotator cuff disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 23 (01) CD005619
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Thigpen CA, Shaffer MA, Gaunt BW, Leggin BG, Williams GR, Wilcox III RB. The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016; 25 (04) 521-535
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hughes A, Even T, Narvani AA. , et al. Pattern and time phase of shoulder function and power recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21 (10) 1299-1303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Shea KP. , et al. The effect of early range of motion on quality of life, clinical outcome, and repair integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2017; 33 (06) 1138-1148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mollison S, Shin JJ, Glogau A, Beavis RC. Postoperative rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a web-based survey of AANA and AOSSM Members. Orthop J Sports Med 2017; 5 (01) 2325967116684775
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Riboh JC, Garrigues GE. Early passive motion versus immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2014; 30 (08) 997-1005
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Thomson S, Jukes C, Lewis J. Rehabilitation following surgical repair of the rotator cuff: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2016; 102 (01) 20-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Düzgün I, Baltacı G, Atay OA. Comparison of slow and accelerated rehabilitation protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: pain and functional activity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011; 45 (01) 23-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mall NA, Tanaka MJ, Choi LS, Paletta Jr GA. Factors affecting rotator cuff healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96 (09) 778-788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jeong JY, Song SY, Yoo JC, Park KM, Lee SM. Comparison of outcomes with arthroscopic repair of acute-on-chronic within 6 months and chronic rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017; 26 (04) 648-655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Conti M, Garofalo R, Delle Rose G. , et al. Post-operative rehabilitation after surgical repair of the rotator cuff. Chir Organi Mov 2009; 93 (Suppl. 01) S55-S63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Garofalo R, Conti M, Notarnicola A, Maradei L, Giardella A, Castagna A. Effects of one-month continuous passive motion after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: results at 1-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study. Musculoskelet Surg 2010; 94 (Suppl. 01) S79-S83
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vo A, Zhou H, Dumont G. , et al. Physical therapy and rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a review of current concepts. Int J Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 1: 142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14 (07) 798-804
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; (214) 160-164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ware Jr J, Kosinski M, Keller SDA. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34 (03) 220-233
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Nikolaidou O, Migkou S, Karampalis C. Rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair. Open Orthop J 2017; 11: 154-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH. Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?. Am J Sports Med 2012; 40 (04) 815-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Huang T-S, Wang S-F, Lin J-J. Comparison of aggressive and traditional postoperative rehabilitation protocol after rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis. J Nov Physiother 2013; 3 (04) 1000170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lastayo PC, Wright T, Jaffe R, Hartzel J. Continuous passive motion after repair of the rotator cuff. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (07) 1002-1011
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL. Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010; 19 (07) 1034-1039
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Klintberg IH, Gunnarsson AC, Svantesson U, Styf J, Karlsson J. Early loading in physiotherapy treatment after full-thickness rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized pilot-study with a two-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23 (07) 622-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gandek B, Ware Jr JE, Aaronson NK. , et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11) 1171-1178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009; 18 (06) 927-932
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cole BJ, McCarty III LP, Kang RW, Alford W, Lewis PB, Hayden JK. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: prospective functional outcome and repair integrity at minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16 (05) 579-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Björnsson HC, Norlin R, Johansson K, Adolfsson LE. The influence of age, delay of repair, and tendon involvement in acute rotator cuff tears: structural and clinical outcomes after repair of 42 shoulders. Acta Orthop 2011; 82 (02) 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kukkonen J, Kauko T, Vahlberg T, Joukainen A, Aärimaa V. Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22 (12) 1650-1655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lee E, Bishop JY, Braman JP, Langford J, Gelber J, Flatow EL. Outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007; 16 (01) 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Gialanella B, Grossetti F, Mazza M, Danna L, Comini L. Functional recovery after rotator cuff repair: the role of biceps surgery. J Sport Rehabil 2018; 27(1): 83-93
    PubMedGoogle Scholar