CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2018; 06(03): 161-166
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673404
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Evaluation of Blood Loss and Implant Alignment after Total Knee Arthroplasty with Inertial Based Extramedullary Femoral Cutting Guide

Tommaso Bonanzinga
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
2   Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
,
Piergiuseppe Tanzi
3   Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologne, Italy
,
Maria Pia Neri
3   Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologne, Italy
,
Francesco Iacono
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
2   Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
,
Claudio Mazzola
4   Hospital Galliera, Genoa, Italy
,
Alberto Belluati
5   Complex Unit of Orthopedic Hospital of Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy
,
Andrea Colombelli
5   Complex Unit of Orthopedic Hospital of Ravenna, Ravenna, Italy
,
Stefano Zaffagnini
3   Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, Bologne, Italy
,
Maurilio Marcacci
1   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
2   Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

18. November 2017

26. August 2018

Publikationsdatum:
18. Oktober 2018 (online)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare, in terms of blood loss and implant alignment, a new generation of smart extramedullary (EM) cutting guides with the conventional intramedullary (IM) guide for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that the EM system would result in less blood loss and fewer days of hospitalization, while ensuring equal or higher accuracy in the alignment of the femoral implant.

Methods Thirty-six patients were enrolled for the present study: 18 patients underwent TKA using the EM guide and for the other 18 patients the IM guide was used. Preoperative and postoperative X-rays were acquired. The preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values were compared. Lastly, length of hospital stay was recorded.

Results The hemoglobin difference was significantly lower in the EM group. The alignment of the prosthetic femoral implant in the two groups was comparable but all patients in the EM cohort had a final alignment within 3 degrees of range on the frontal view, while 22% of the patients in the IM cohort had a final alignment exceeding 3 degrees of range. The mean hospitalization duration showed no significant difference between groups, though EM group showed 1.6 days less compared with IM group.

Conclusions The inertial-based EM guide system could be useful for decreasing blood loss compared with conventional guide. This device tended to have better results even in terms of accuracy, but this difference was not significant.

Level of Evidence This is a level II, prospective cohort study.

 
  • References

  • 1 Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
  • 2 Maderbacher G, Schaumburger J, Baier C. , et al. Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (08) 2453-2460
  • 3 Kim YH. Incidence of fat embolism syndrome after cemented or cementless bilateral simultaneous and unilateral total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (06) 730-739
  • 4 Kalairajah Y, Simpson D, Cossey AJ, Verrall GM, Spriggins AJ. Blood loss after total knee replacement: effects of computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (11) 1480-1482
  • 5 Kandel L, Vasili C, Kirsh G. Extramedullary femoral alignment instrumentation reduces blood loss after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19 (04) 256-258
  • 6 Scuderi GR, Fallaha M, Masse V, Lavigne P, Amiot LP, Berthiaume MJ. Total knee arthroplasty with a novel navigation system within the surgical field. Orthop Clin North Am 2014; 45 (02) 167-173
  • 7 Nam D, Cody EA, Nguyen JT, Figgie MP, Mayman DJ. Extramedullary guides versus portable, accelerometer-based navigation for tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled trial: winner of the 2013 HAP PAUL award. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (02) 288-294
  • 8 Nam D, Jerabek SA, Haughom B, Cross MB, Reinhardt KR, Mayman DJ. Radiographic analysis of a hand-held surgical navigation system for tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011; 26 (08) 1527-1533
  • 9 Nam D, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Heyse TJ, Mayman DJ. Accelerometer-based computer navigation for performing the distal femoral resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (09) 1717-1722
  • 10 Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (6, Suppl): 39-43
  • 11 Heidari B. Knee osteoarthritis prevalence, risk factors, pathogenesis and features: Part I. Caspian J Intern Med 2011; 2 (02) 205-212
  • 12 Jeon SH, Kim JH, Lee JM, Seo ES. Efficacy of extramedullary femoral component alignment guide system for blood saving after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012; 24 (02) 99-103
  • 13 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
  • 14 Sikorski JM. Alignment in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90 (09) 1121-1127
  • 15 Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD. The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (02) 379-385
  • 16 Collier MB, Engh Jr CA, McAuley JP, Engh GA. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (06) 1306-1314
  • 17 Goh GS, Liow MH, Lim WS, Tay DK, Yeo SJ, Tan MH. Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical Axis after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective matched study. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (01) 92-97
  • 18 Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22 (08) 1097-1106
  • 19 Nam D, Dy CJ, Cross MB, Kang MN, Mayman DJ. Cadaveric results of an accelerometer based, extramedullary navigation system for the tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2012; 19 (05) 617-621
  • 20 Nam D, Weeks KD, Reinhardt KR, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Mayman DJ. Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of radiographic results. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28 (02) 255-261
  • 21 Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003; 85 (06) 830-835
  • 22 Duparc J, Massare C. [Radiological measurement of the angular deviation of the knee in the frontal plane]. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1967; 10 (09) 635-656
  • 23 Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89 (04) 477-480