Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2018; 22(05): 522-527
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673384
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Musculoskeletal Radiology Practice Subspecialization in Canada: A Subject of Substance?

Richard E. A. Walker
1   Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2   McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
,
Laurie A. Hiemstra
3   Banff Sport Medicine, Banff, Alberta, Canada
4   Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
,
Bruce B. Forster
5   Department of Radiology, UBC Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 November 2018 (online)

Abstract

Scientific and technological advances in medical imaging have had a profound impact on health care around the world including Canada. The cost of imaging, however, continues to rise along with innovation. Building a practical subspecialty musculoskeletal imaging service offers the specialty of radiology an opportunity to show how radiologists can consistently add value and improve outcomes without adding a great cost burden to the health care system.

 
  • References

  • 1 Atlas SW. Embracing Subspecialization: The Key To The Survival Of Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4 (11) 752-753
  • 2 Breslau J. Point: Generalism vs subspecialization—the ACR should encourage radiologists to structure their practices around a model of subspecialization. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9 (08) 535-536
  • 3 Strax R. Counterpoint: Generalism vs subspecialization—the ACR should develop a practice model to support general radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 2012; 9 (08) 537-538
  • 4 Mok PS, Probyn L, Finlay K. Factors influencing radiology residents' fellowship training and practice preferences in Canada. Can Assoc Radiol J 2016; 67 (02) 99-104
  • 5 Waldron D. Revisit, revamp and revitalize your business plan: part 1. Radiol Manage 2011; 33 (02) 16-21 ; quiz 23–24
  • 6 Yablon CM, Lee KS, Jacobson JA. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography: starting your practice. Semin Roentgenol 2013; 48 (02) 167-177
  • 7 Alderson PO. Customer service and satisfaction in radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175 (02) 319-323
  • 8 Boland GW, Duszak Jr R, McGinty G, Allen Jr B. Delivery of appropriateness, quality, safety, efficiency and patient satisfaction. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11 (01) 7-11
  • 9 Duong PAT, Pastel DA, Sadigh G. , et al. The value of imaging Part II: Value beyond image interpretation. Acad Radiol 2016; 23 (01) 23-29
  • 10 Hoe J. Quality service in radiology. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2007; 3 (03) e24
  • 11 Kopka M, Mohtadi N, Naylor A, Walker R, Donald M, Frank C. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in acute knee injuries can be reduced by non-physician expert clinics. Phys Sportsmed 2015; 43 (01) 30-36
  • 12 Nobbee D, Frizzell JB. Reducing unnecessary knee MRI in patients with known osteoarthritis. Paper presented at: Annual Scientific Meeting of the Canadian Association of Radiologists; April 26–29, 2018; Montreal, QC, Canada
  • 13 Kostrubiak DE, Kwon M, Lee J. , et al. Mentorship in radiology. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017; 46 (05) 385-390
  • 14 Munk PL. Mentoring: helping others do what they can, as well as they can. Can Assoc Radiol J 2015; 66 (04) 301
  • 15 Yu JPJ, Kansagra AP, Thaker A, Colucci A, Sherry SJ, Subramaniam RM. Building for tomorrow today: opportunities and directions in radiology resident research. Acad Radiol 2015; 22 (01) 50-57
  • 16 Chang SD, Nicolaou S, Forster BB. Research mentorship for our residents and fellows: a vital supplement for the health of our specialty. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017; 46 (05) 349-350
  • 17 Lozano KDS, Hawkins CM, Rosenthal SA, Matsumoto AH, Ma LD, Applegate KE. Driving change: taking ownership of our profession and its future. J Am Coll Radiol 2014; 11 (04) 359-361