CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Journal of Academic Ophthalmology 2018; 10(01): e133-e139
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668575
Research Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Quantifying the Impact of Research on Matching into Ophthalmology Residency

Albert R. Bargoud
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Loka Thangamathesvaran
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Varesh R. Patel
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Robert Henseler
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
William Kass
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
,
Albert S. Khouri
1   Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

22 May 2018

09 July 2018

Publication Date:
21 August 2018 (online)

Abstract

Purpose This article aims to quantify the impact of research on matching into various tiers of ophthalmology residency programs.

Design In this study, 340 applicants who matriculated into ophthalmology residency programs in the United States from the class of 2019 were included. Data variables collected for each applicant composed of the following: Hirsch's index (h-index), total number of publications, journal impact factor, type of publication, and number of publications relating to ophthalmology. The primary outcome was tier of ophthalmology program that each applicant matched into, which was determined by two metrics: (1) the h-index of the department's faculty and (2) overall reputation of the residency program as characterized by the U.S. News and World Report Ophthalmology Rankings.

Results After multivariate analysis, only the h-index was found to be associated with an increased likelihood of matching at a higher tier program when measuring tier based on the metric of institutional research output (p < 0.0001). However, no research variable was found to be significant on multivariate analysis when assessing the impact of research on matching into a certain tier program based on reputation. The h-index was noted to increase by 1 for every 3.1 papers as the first author, every 4.9 years since the first publication, every 6.4 ophthalmology-related publications, and every publication in a journal with an impact factor of 5.2.

Conclusion A higher applicant h-index is associated with matching at an ophthalmology program with greater research output; however, it is not associated with reputation of residency program.

 
  • References

  • 1 Loh AR, Joseph D, Keenan JD, Lietman TM, Naseri A. Predictors of matching in an ophthalmology residency program. Ophthalmology 2013; 120 (04) 865-870
  • 2 Yousuf SJ, Jones LS. Ophthalmology residency match outcomes for 2011. Ophthalmology 2012; 119 (03) 642-646
  • 3 Nallasamy S, Uhler T, Nallasamy N, Tapino PJ, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident selection: current trends in selection criteria and improving the process. Ophthalmology 2010; 117 (05) 1041-1047
  • 4 Kashkoush A, Prabhu AV, Tonetti D, Agarwal N. The neurosurgery match: a bibliometric analysis of 206 first-year residents. World Neurosurg 2017; 105: 341-347
  • 5 Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102 (46) 16569-16572
  • 6 Huang G, Fang CH, Lopez SA, Bhagat N, Langer PD, Eloy JA. Impact of fellowship training on research productivity in academic ophthalmology. J Surg Educ 2015; 72 (03) 410-417
  • 7 Lopez SA, Svider PF, Misra P, Bhagat N, Langer PD, Eloy JA. Gender differences in promotion and scholarly impact: an analysis of 1460 academic ophthalmologists. J Surg Educ 2014; 71 (06) 851-859
  • 8 Svider PF, Lopez SA, Husain Q, Bhagat N, Eloy JA, Langer PD. The association between scholarly impact and National Institutes of Health funding in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (01) 423-428
  • 9 Thiessen CR, Venable GT, Ridenhour NC, Kerr NC. Publication productivity for academic ophthalmologists and academic ophthalmology departments in the United States: an analytical report. J Clin Acad Ophthalmol 2016; 8: e19-e29
  • 10 Doximity Residency Navigator - Ophthalmology Residency Programs. Available at: https://residency.doximity.com/programs?residency_specialty_id=50&sort_by=reputation&location_type=region . Accessed May 10, 2018
  • 11 Hsieh FY, Lavori PW, Cohen HJ, Feussner JR. An overview of variance inflation factors for sample-size calculation. Eval Health Prof 2003; 26 (03) 239-257
  • 12 San Francisco Match. Ophthalmology Residency Match Summary Report 2017. Available at: https://www.sfmatch.org/PDFFilesDisplay/Ophthalmology_Residency_Stats_2017.pdf . Accessed October 2, 2017
  • 13 Driver TH, Loh AR, Joseph D, Keenan JD, Naseri A. Predictors of matching in ophthalmology residency for international medical graduates. Ophthalmology 2014; 121 (04) 974-975.e2
  • 14 Lee AG, Golnik KC, Oetting TA. , et al. Re-engineering the resident applicant selection process in ophthalmology: a literature review and recommendations for improvement. Surv Ophthalmol 2008; 53 (02) 164-176
  • 15 Stain SC, Hiatt JR, Ata A. , et al. Characteristics of highly ranked applicants to general surgery residency programs. JAMA Surg 2013; 148 (05) 413-417