Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2018; 07(02): 102-115
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1668494
Review Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

New Programming Modes of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Outcomes with Burst and High-Frequency Technology

Jeffrey J. Bergman
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Derrick A. Dupré
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Nestor D. Tomycz
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 September 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established, evidence-based treatment for chronic pain. For decades, implantation of tonic SCS systems has relied on epidural electric lead placement to overlap regions of pain with paresthesias to achieve maximal postoperative pain relief. During the course of tonic SCS treatment, tolerances to the stimulation frequency may develop, leading to reduced efficacy. Recent developments in novel programming modes, such as high-frequency 10 kHz (HF10) and burst, stray from tonic SCS in their electrical stimulation delivery patterns and unique ability to deliver SCS without engendering paresthesias. To date, no review has analyzed outcomes of both HF10 SCS and burst SCS for chronic back and limb pain. This article aims to review all HF10 and burst SCS prospective observational and randomized controlled trials for chronic back and limb pain. The literature search identified 21 papers—10 HF10 SCS papers, 9 burst SCS papers, and 2 papers assessing both HF10 and burst SCS concurrently. Burst SCS and HF10 SCS have been subjected to randomized controlled studies and have used similar patient pain score reporting on a visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric rating scale (NRS). Results from these studies have reported significant reductions in axial back pain and limb pain in patients sustained for up 20 months with burst SCS treatment and up to 36 months with HF10 SCS. Both novel programming modes show promise as viable treatments for those suffering from chronic pain and/or patients who may no longer be responders to tonic SCS.

Keywords

spinal cord stimulation - chronic pain - neurostimulation
 

  • References

  • 1 Zhang S, Seymour B. Technology for chronic pain. Curr Biol 2014; 24 (18) R930-R935
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kumar K, Caraway DL, Rizvi S, Bishop S. Current challenges in spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation 2014; 17 (Suppl. 01) 22-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Song Z, Ultenius C, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. Pain relief by spinal cord stimulation involves serotonergic mechanisms: an experimental study in a rat model of mononeuropathy. Pain 2009; 147 (01) (03) 241-248
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bushnell MC, Ceko M, Low LA. Cognitive and emotional control of pain and its disruption in chronic pain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013; 14 (07) 502-511
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Butt MT, Alataris K, Walker A, Tiede JM. Histological findings using novel stimulation parameters in a caprine model. Eur J Pain Suppl 2011; 5: 188-189
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 De Ridder D, Vanneste S. Burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation: different and common brain mechanisms. Neuromodulation 2016; 19 (01) 47-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plazier M, Vancamp T. Mimicking the brain: evaluation of St Jude Medical's Prodigy Chronic Pain System with Burst Technology. Expert Rev Med Devices 2015; 12 (02) 143-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 de Vos CC, Bom MJ, Vanneste S, Lenders MW, de Ridder D. Burst spinal cord stimulation evaluated in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic neuropathy. Neuromodulation 2014; 17 (02) 152-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Schu S, Slotty PJ, Bara G, von Knop M, Edgar D, Vesper J. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effectiveness of burst spinal cord stimulation patterns for the treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. Neuromodulation 2014; 17 (05) 443-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Slavin KV. Spinal stimulation for pain: future applications. Neurotherapeutics 2014; 11 (03) 535-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cui JG, O'Connor WT, Ungerstedt U, Linderoth B, Meyerson BA. Spinal cord stimulation attenuates augmented dorsal horn release of excitatory amino acids in mononeuropathy via a GAB-Aergic mechanism. Pain 1997; 73 (01) 87-95
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Koga K, Furue H, Rashid MH, Takaki A, Katafuchi T, Yoshimura M. Selective activation of primary afferent fibers evaluated by sine-wave electrical stimulation. Mol Pain 2005; 1: 13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kemler MA, de Vet HC, Barendse GA, van den Wildenberg FA, van Kleef M. Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic complex regional pain syndrome type I: five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (02) 292-298
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study. Pain Med 2014; 15 (03) 347-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith T, Harris S, Pang D. The use of 10-kilohertz spinal cord stimulation in a cohort of patients with chronic neuropathic limb pain refractory to medical management. Neuromodulation 2015; 18 (01) 18-23 discussion 23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW. et al. Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2015; 123 (04) 851-860
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Russo M, Verrills P, Mitchell B, Salmon J, Barnard A, Santarelli D. High frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of chronic pain: 6-month Australian clinical experience. Pain Physician 2016; 19 (04) 267-280
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tiede J, Brown L, Gekht G, Vallejo R, Yearwood T, Morgan D. Novel spinal cord stimulation parameters in patients with predominant back pain. Neuromodulation 2013; 16 (04) 370-375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Van Buyten JP, Al-Kaisy A, Smet I, Palmisani S, Smith T. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study. Neuromodulation 2013; 16 (01) 59-65 discussion 65–66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE. et al. 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain in patients with no history of spinal surgery: a preliminary, prospective, open label and proof-of-concept study. Neuromodulation 2017a 20 (01) 63-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE. et al. Long-term improvements in chronic axial low back pain patients without previous spinal surgery: a cohort analysis of 10-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation over 36 months. Pain Med 2018; 19 (06) 1219-1226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Thomson SJ, Tavakkolizadeh M, Love-Jones S. et al. Effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation: results of the PROCO randomized controlled trial. Neuromodulation 2018; 21 (01) 67-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Peña C. P130022 Approval Letter. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and Radiological Health; 2005. Available via FDA. 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Cuellar JM, Alataris K, Walker A, Yeomans DC, Antognini JF. Effect of high-frequency alternating current on spinal afferent nociceptive transmission. Neuromodulation 2013; 16 (04) 318-327 discussion 327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Plazier M, van der Loo E, Menovsky T. Burst spinal cord stimulation: toward paresthesia-free pain suppression. Neurosurgery 2010; 66 (05) 986-990
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kim U, McCormick DA. The functional influence of burst and tonic firing mode on synaptic interactions in the thalamus. J Neurosci 1998; 18 (22) 9500-9516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 De Ridder D, Plazier M, Kamerling N, Menovsky T, Vanneste S. Burst spinal cord stimulation for limb and back pain. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (05) 642-649.e1
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Van Havenbergh T, Vancamp T, Van Looy P, Vanneste S, De Ridder D. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: 500-Hz vs. 1000-Hz burst stimulation. Neuromodulation 2015; 18 (01) 9-12 discussion 12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Courtney P, Espinet A, Mitchell B. et al. Improved pain relief with burst spinal cord stimulation for two weeks in patients using tonic stimulation: results from a small clinical study. Neuromodulation 2015; 18 (05) 361-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 De Ridder D, Lenders MW, De Vos CC. et al. A 2-center comparative study on tonic versus burst spinal cord stimulation: amount of responders and amount of pain suppression. Clin J Pain 2015; 31 (05) 433-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kinfe TM, Pintea B, Link C. et al. High frequency (10 kHz) or burst spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant back pain: preliminary data from a prospective observational study. Neuromodulation 2016; 19 (03) 268-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Deer T, Slavin KV, Amirdelfan K. et al. Success using neuromodulation with BURST (SUNBURST) study: results from a prospective, randomized controlled trial using a novel burst waveform. Neuromodulation 2018; 21 (01) 56-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW. et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery 2016; 79 (05) 667-677
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tjepkema-Cloostermans MC, de Vos CC, Wolters R, Dijkstra-Scholten C, Lenders MW. Effect of burst stimulation evaluated in patients familiar with spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation 2016; 19 (05) 492-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Muhammad S, Roeske S, Chaudhry SR, Kinfe TM. Burst or high-frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation in failed back surgery syndrome patients with predominant back pain: one year comparative data. Neuromodulation 2017; 20 (07) 661-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L. et al. Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Pain 2007; 132 (01) (02) 179-188
    Google Scholar
  • 37 North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (01) 98-106 discussion 106–107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Barolat G, Ketcik B, He J. Long-term outcome of spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain management. Neuromodulation 1998; 1 (01) 19-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bell GK, Kidd D, North RB. Cost-effectiveness analysis of spinal cord stimulation in treatment of failed back surgery syndrome. J Pain Symptom Manage 1997; 13 (05) 286-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Deer T, Kim C, Bowman R, Ranson M, Douglas CS, Tolentino W. Spinal cord stimulation as a method of reducing opioids in severe chronic pain: a case report and review of the literature. W V Med J 2010; 106 (04) Spec No 56-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kumar K, Rizvi S. Cost-effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation therapy in management of chronic pain. Pain Med 2013; 14 (11) 1631-1649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Verrills P, Sinclair C, Barnard A. A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain. J Pain Res 2016; 9: 481-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C. et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013; 14 (05) 365-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Han JL, Murphy KR, Hussaini SM. et al. Explantation rates and healthcare resource utilization in spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation 2017; 20 (04) 331-339 Epub ahead of print
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Kumar K, Wilson JR, Taylor RS, Gupta S. Complications of spinal cord stimulation, suggestions to improve outcome, and financial impact. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 5 (03) 191-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar