Open Access
CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2016; 03(02): 183
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667582
Abstracts
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Intranasal transmucosal sphenopalatine ganglion block: An approach to block anterior scalp innervation

Moningi Srilata
Department of Anaesthesia, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Narmada Padhy
Department of Anaesthesia, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Dilip Kumar Kulkarni
Department of Anaesthesia, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
Rajesh,
Srikanth Inturi
Department of Anaesthesia, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
,
R. Gopinath
Department of Anaesthesia, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
13. Juli 2018 (online)

Preview

Introduction: Scalp block is traditionally given based on innervations and local infiltration to specific sites where the superficial nerves emerge. These nerves are branches of trigeminal nerve branches anteriorly and cervical plexuses posteriorly. That is supratrochlear and supraorbital are from ophthalmic division, zygomaticotemporal is from maxillary division, auriculotemporal and posterior auricular are from mandibular division, greater and lesser occipital are the branches from cervical plexus. Sphenopalatine ganglion block by transnasal route blocks the sphenopatlatine ganglion and its emerging nerve roots. This requires minimal expertise in placement of culture swabs impregnated with local anaesthetic. Once the culture swabs were in place bilaterally, 5 ml of 0.5% sensorcaine was instilled with the help of an intravenous catheter. This blocks the nerves supplying the anterior part of the cranium from suprorbital nerve to posterior auricular nerve. To complete the block, all the patients also received specific nerve block in the posterior area pertaining to the exact site of pin placement. This study was, therefore, done to analyse if this approach can be an alternative to anterior scalp block in patients undergoing craniotomies. Materials and Methods: After approval from Institutional Ethics Committee, 50 patients undergoing elective craniotomy surgeries for various causes who belonged to American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II were randomly assigned into two groups (Group SPG - sphenopalatine block, Group S - scalp block). After induction and intubation, either of the procedure was performed as per the group. All the patients were maintained with 0.8–1 minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane concentration throughout the procedure. The patients were observed for haemodynamic parameters following pin insertion, surgical incision and dural incision. Secondary objectives included any complications observed. Results: This was done for 25 patients in each group. All the data were normally distributed. Two sample independent t-test was done for numerical, ordinal data which showed there was no significant difference between the two groups (for haemodynamics). Discussion and Conclusion: Transnasal sphenopalatine block is a non-invasive technique and requires very less dosage of local anaesthetic for its blockade. This minimally invasive technique of blocking the scalp nerves can be an effective alternative to scalp block in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial surgeries.