PDF herunterladen
Semin Hear 2018; 39(03): 275-287
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1666818
Review Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Oculomotor Assessment in Children

Steven M. Doettl
1   Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, College of Health Professions, Knoxville, Tennessee
,
Devin L. McCaslin
2   Division of Audiology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
20. Juli 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Oculomotor evaluation as part of videonystagmography is an integral tool in the assessment of vestibular function providing a global assessment of the neurological pathways associated with oculomotor function. The value of an oculomotor evaluation for pediatric evaluation is well established; however, many questions can also arise with the application to the pediatric population. Oculomotor function is age dependent which can have a significant effect on the test results obtain in children. The underlying neural substrates and age effects are discussed across the literature with specific results from recent research using clinical oculomotor equipment and protocols. The evidence suggests there are several key differences in the pediatric population compared with adults. These include longer saccade latencies, reduced smooth pursuit gain, increased optokinetic asymmetry, increased variability in all responses, and increased artifact in saccade and smooth pursuit testing.

Keywords

Children - dizziness - videonystagmography - oculomotor
 

  • References

  • 1 Heywood S, Churcher J. Direction-specific and position-specific effects upon detection of displacements during saccadic eye movements. Vision Res 1981; 21 (02) 255-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Leigh R, Zee D. The Neurology of Eye Movements. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Shepard N, Schubert M. Background and Technique of Ocular Motility Testing. Balance Function Assessment and Management. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2008: 144
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Sylvestre PA, Cullen KE. Quantitative analysis of abducens neuron discharge dynamics during saccadic and slow eye movements. J Neurophysiol 1999; 82 (05) 2612-2632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T. The control of gaze. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM. , eds. Principles of Neural Science. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000: 792-793
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Gredebäck G, von Hofsten C, Karlsson J, Aus K. The development of two-dimensional tracking: a longitudinal study of circular pursuit. Exp Brain Res 2005; 163 (02) 204-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 McCaslin DL. Videonystagmography and Electronystagmography. 1st ed. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2008: 144
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Levens SL. Electronystagmography in normal children. Br J Audiol 1988; 22 (01) 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kenyon GS. Neuro-otological findings in normal children. J R Soc Med 1988; 81 (11) 644-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fukushima J, Hatta T, Fukushima K. Development of voluntary control of saccadic eye movements. I. Age-related changes in normal children. Brain Dev 2000; 22 (03) 173-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Klein C, Foerster F. Development of prosaccade and antisaccade task performance in participants aged 6 to 26 years. Psychophysiology 2001; 38 (02) 179-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yang Q, Bucci MP, Kapoula Z. The latency of saccades, vergence, and combined eye movements in children and in adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43 (09) 2939-2949
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Salman MS, Sharpe JA, Lillakas L, Dennis M, Steinbach MJ. Smooth pursuit eye movements in children. Exp Brain Res 2006; 169 (01) 139-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rütsche A, Baumann A, Jiang X, Mojon DS. Development of visual pursuit in the first 6 years of life. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006; 244 (11) 1406-1411
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jacobs M, Harris CM, Shawkat F, Taylor D. Smooth pursuit development in infants. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997; 25 (03) 199-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 D'Agostino R, Melagrana A, Pasquale G, Taborelli G. The study of optokinetic ‘look’ nystagmus in children: our experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 40 (2-3): 141-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Doettl SM, Plyler PN, McCaslin DL, Schay NL. Pediatric oculomotor findings during monocular videonystagmography: a developmental study. J Am Acad Audiol 2015; 26 (08) 703-715
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Haishi K, Kokubun M. Developmental trends in pursuit eye movements among preschool children. Percept Mot Skills 1995; 81 (3 Pt 2, Suppl): 1131-1137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Langaas T, Mon-Williams M, Wann JP, Pascal E, Thompson C. Eye movements, prematurity and developmental co-ordination disorder. Vision Res 1998; 38 (12) 1817-1826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Breckenridge K, Braddick O, Atkinson J. The organization of attention in typical development: a new preschool attention test battery. Br J Dev Psychol 2013; 31 (Pt 3): 271-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Munoz DP, Broughton JR, Goldring JE, Armstrong IT. Age-related performance of human subjects on saccadic eye movement tasks. Exp Brain Res 1998; 121 (04) 391-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Stockwell CW. ENG Workbook. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 23 MacLachlan C, Howland HC. Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2002; 22 (03) 175-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Doettl SM, Plyler PN, McCaslin DL. Artifact in pediatric oculomotor findings during videonystagmography: a retrospective analysis. J Am Acad Audiol 2017; 28 (04) 314-324
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kang S, Kim US. Normative data of videonystagmography in young healthy adults under 40 years old. Korean J Ophthalmol 2015; 29 (02) 126-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar