PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2018; 40(06): 309-312
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1657765
Original Article
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abortion in the Structure of Causes of Maternal Mortality

Aborto na estrutura das causas da mortalidade materna
Valery G. Volkov
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical institute, Tula State University, Тula, Russia
,
Nina N. Granatovich
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical institute, Tula State University, Тula, Russia
,
Elena V. Survillo
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical institute, Tula State University, Тula, Russia
,
Leontina V. Pichugina
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical institute, Tula State University, Тula, Russia
,
Zarina S. Achilgova
1   Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical institute, Tula State University, Тula, Russia
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

16. Januar 2018

10. April 2018

Publikationsdatum:
12. Juni 2018 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Objective To study the structure of maternal mortality caused by abortion in the Tula region.

Methods The medical records of deceased pregnant women, childbirth, and postpartum from January 01, 2001, to December 31, 2015, were analyzed.

Results Overall, 204,095 abortion cases were recorded in the Tula region for over 15 years. The frequency of abortion was reduced 4-fold, with 18,200 in 2001 to 4,538 in 2015. The rate of abortions per 1,000 women (age 15–44 years) for 15 years decreased by 40.5%, that is, from 46.53 (2001) to 18.84 (2015), and that of abortions per 100 live births and stillbirths was 29.5%, that is, from 161.7 (2001) to 41.5 (2015). Five women died from abortion complications that began outside of the hospital, which accounted for 0.01% of the total number. In the structure of causes of maternal mortality for 15 years, abortion represented 14.3% of the cases. Lethality mainly occurred in the period from 2001 to 2005 (4 cases). Among the maternal deaths, many women died in rural areas after pregnancy termination at 18 to 20 weeks of gestation (n = 4). In addition, three women died from sepsis and two from bleeding.

Conclusion The introduction of modern, effective technologies of family planning has reduced maternal mortality due to abortion.

Resumo

Objetivos Estudar a estrutura da mortalidade materna causada pelo aborto na região de Tula.

Métodos Os registros médicos de mulheres grávidas falecidas, de parto e de pós-parto, de 01 de janeiro de 2001 a 31 de dezembro de 2015, foram analisados.

Resultados No geral, 204.095 casos de aborto foram registrados na região de Tula, em um período de 15 anos. A frequência de aborto foi reduzida a 1/4, passando de 18.200 abortos em 2001 para 4.538 em 2015. A taxa de abortos a cada 1.000 mulheres (com idades entre 15 e 44 anos) diminuiu 40,5% em 15 anos, isto é, de 46,53 (2001) para 18,84 (2015), e a taxa de abortos a cada 100 nascidos vivos e natimortos foi de 29,5%, isto é, de 161,7 (2001) para 41,5 (2015). Cinco mulheres morreram de complicações do aborto que começaram fora do hospital, o que representou 0,01% do número total. No quadro geral de causas de mortalidade materna neste período de 15 anos, o aborto representou 14,3% dos casos. A letalidade ocorreu, principalmente, no período de 2001 a 2005 (4 casos). Entre as mortes maternas, muitas mulheres morreram em áreas rurais após a interrupção da gravidez, com 18 a 20 semanas de gestação (n= 4). Além disso, três mulheres morreram por sepse, e duas, por sangramento.

Conclusão Com a introdução de tecnologias de planejamento familiar modernas e eficazes, a mortalidade materna devido ao aborto vem sendo reduzida.

Keywords

abortion - pregnancy - maternal mortality - family planning - sepsis

Palavras-chave

aborto - gravidez - mortalidade materna - planeamento familiar - sepse
 

  • References

  • 1 Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D. , et al; United Nations Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group collaborators and technical advisory group. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Lancet 2016; 387 (10017): 462-474 . Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Main EK, Menard MK. Maternal mortality: time for national action. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (04) 735-736 . Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a7dc8c
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zagidullina VM, Ryzhova AS. [Maternal mortality as an integral indicator, reflecting the health of women]. Voprosy Jekonomiki Prava 2015; 83: 163-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Filippov OS, Tokova ZZ, Gata AS, Kuzemyn AA, Gudimova VV. [Abortion: special statistics in the federal districts of Russian Federation]. Gynecology 2016; 18: 92-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Volkov VG, Granatovich NN. [The main causes of maternal mortality in the Tula region in the twenty-first century]. Akusherstvo Ginekologiya Novosti Mneniya Obuchenie 2017; 2: 10-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pestrikova TYu. [Major indicators of reproductive health of the population of the Far Eastern Federal District in 2014]. Vestnik Obshhestvennogo Zdorov'ja Zdravoohranenija Dal'nego Vostoka Rossii. 2015; (4): 2. http://www.fesmu.ru/voz/20154/2015402.aspx . Accessed December, 10, 2017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Petrenko SA, Mirovich ED, Suhurova LS, Meljohina LM. [A comparative analysis of birth and abortion rates in Ukraine and in Donetsk region]. Bull Urgent Recover Med 2012; 1: 164-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mambetov MA, Bolbachan OA, Bujlashev TS, Ibraimova DD. [Frequency and structure of abortions among women of reproductive age in the Kyrgyzstan]. Nauka Novye Tehnologii Innovacii 2016; 5: 68-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S. , et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet 2016; 388 (10041): 258-267 . Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30380-30384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Denisov BP, Sakevich VI. [Abortion in post-soviet Russia: is there any reason for optimism?]. Demograficheskoe Obozrenie 2014; 1: 144-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bantyeva MN. [The abortion problem situation in Russia in 2008–2015 years]. Obstet Gynecol Reprod 2016; 10: 47-52 . Doi: 10.17749/2313-7347.2016.10.2.047-052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Vigoureux S. [Epidemiology of induced abortion in France]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2016; 45 (10) 1462-1476 . Doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2016.09.024
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Repina MA. [Obstetrics technology in XXI century and maternal mortality in Sankt-Peterburg]. Herald of the Northwestern State Medical University Named After I.I . Mechnikov 2010; 2: 49-59
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ushakova GA, Artymuk NV, Zelenina EM. , et al. [Sepsis and maternal mortality in the Kemerovo region]. Rossijskij Vestnik Akushera-Ginekologa 2010; 10: 7-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Granatovich NN, Volkov VG. Sepsis in childbirth and the postnatal period as a cause of the regional maternal mortality rate. V.F . Snegirev Arch Obstet Gynecol 2017; 4: 36-39 . Doi: 10.18821/231387262017413639
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stupak VS. [Maternal Mortality in the Khabarovsk region: analysis of structure and ways of its reduction]. Dal'nevostochnyj Medicinskij Zhurnal 2013; 1: 50-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kovalev BV, Bashmakova NV, Kajumova AV, Mazurov AD. [Dynamic peculiarities of the structure of maternal mortality in the large industrial region]. Ural Med J 2008; 12: 119-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Survillo EV. [Comparative analysis of reproductive attitudes in university female students]. Bull N Med Technol 2016; 2: 2-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar