Thromb Haemost 1997; 77(03): 462-465
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655989
Clinical Studies
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

The Relationship of Venous Diameter to Reflux, Cephalad Thrombus and Cephalad Reflux Following Deep Venous Thrombosis

M J Tullis
The Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
M H Meissner
The Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
R O Bergelin
The Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
M T Caps
The Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
R A Manzo
The Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
D E Strandness
The Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 25 June 1996

Accepted after revision 30 October 1996

Publication Date:
11 July 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

Duplex ultrasonography was used to measure the diameters of the common femoral, superficial femoral and popliteal vein segments in 123 patients following DVT. A cross sectional analysis was done based on the most recent visit to determine chronic venous diameter changes following DVT.

Venous diameters in recanalized segments were smaller at all levels compared to those never occluded (p = 0.06 for CFV and p <0.05 for SFV and PV). After accounting for a previous history of occlusion, the diameters of the segments with and without reflux were not significantly different. There was also no evidence of venodilation in segments caudal to cephalad reflux or thrombus.

Recanalized veins are smaller in diameter than those which were never thrombosed. Cephalad thrombus or reflux is not associated with venodilatation of caudal segments. Reflux following DVT is probably secondary to valvular damage rather than hypertension, since there was no diameter difference between refluxing and non-refluxing segments.