Reliability of Five Rapid D-Dimer Assays Compared to ELISA in the Exclusion of Deep Venous Thrombosis

M C H Janssen; A E Heebels; M de Metz; H Verbruggen; H Wollersheim; S Janssen; M M J Schuurmans; I R O Nováková

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1655950

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Table of Contents

Thromb Haemost 1997; 77(02): 262-266
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1655950

Original Article

Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Reliability of Five Rapid D-Dimer Assays Compared to ELISA in the Exclusion of Deep Venous Thrombosis

M C H Janssen

¹Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, The Netherlands

,

A E Heebels

²Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

,

M de Metz

³Central Clinical Chemical Laboratory, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

,

H Verbruggen

⁴Department of Medicine, Division of Central Hematological Laboratory, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

,

H Wollersheim

¹Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, The Netherlands

,

S Janssen

²Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

,

M M J Schuurmans

²Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

,

I R O Nováková

⁵Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

PDF Download

Summary

Studies measuring the fibrin degradation product D-Dimer (DD) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in patients with venographically proven deep venous thrombosis (DVT) suggest that it is possible to exclude DVT when DD level is below a certain cut-off level. However, ELISA methods are time-consuming and not available in all laboratories. Different rapid latex-agglutination assays have been investigated, but their sensitivity is considerably lower.

In the present study we compared the value of four novel latex DD tests (Tinaquant^®, Minutex^®, Ortho^® and SimpliRed^®) and one rapid ELISA (VIDAS^®) to a classical ELISA DD assay (Organon Mab Y18^®) in 132 patients suspected of DVT.

The VIDAS^®, a new quantitative automated ELISA, had a sensitivity of 100% and a negative predictive value of 100% for both proximal and distal DVT at a cut-off level of 500 ng/ml. The Tinaquant^® assay, a new quantitative latex method, had a sensitivity of 99% and a negative predictive value of 93% for both proximal and distal DVT at a cut-off level of 500 ng/ml. For proximal DVT only, both assays had a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100%. VIDAS^® and Tinaquant^® correlated well with ELISA (correlation of r = 0.96 and r = 0.98 respectively). Sensitivities of the semi-quantitative latex assays Minutex^®, Ortho^® and SimpliRed^® were considerably lower (77%, 51 % and 61 % respectively).

These results suggest that VIDAS^® and Tinaquant^® may be used instead of ELISA DD in the exclusion of DVT. Tinaquant^® can be performed within 20 min and VIDAS^® within 35 min. Both assays might be used as a routine screening test and should be evaluated in large clinical management studies.

PDF (340 kb)

References

References
1 Cranley JJ, Canos AJ, Sull WJ. The diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis Fallibility of clinical symptoms and signs. Arch Surg 1976; 111: 34-36
2 Barnes RW, Wu KK, Hoak JC. Fallibility of the clinical diagnosis of venous thrombosis. JAMA 1975; 234: 605-607
3 Koopman MM, vanBeek EJ, ten Cate JW. Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1994; 37: 01-12
4 Büller HR, Lensing AWA, Hirsh J, ten Cate JW. Deep vein thrombosis: new non-invasive diagnostic tests. Thromb Haemost 1991; 66: 133-137
5 Cogo A, Lensing AWA, Wells P, Prandoni P, Biiller HR. Noninvasive objective tests for the diagnosis of clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis. Haemostasis 1995; 25: 27-39
6 Heijboer H, Büller HR, Lensing AW, Turpie AG, Colly LP, ten Cate JW. A comparison of real-time compression ultrasonography with impedance plethysmography for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symp-to matic outpatients. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1365-1369
7 Bounameaux H, deMoerloose P, Perrier A, Reber G. Plasma measurement of D-dimer as diagnostic aid in suspected venous thromboembolism: an overview. Thromb Haemost 1994; 71: 01-06
8 Speiser W, Mallek R, Koppensteiner R, Stumpflen A, Kapiotis S, Minar E, Ehringer H, Lechner K. D-dimer and TAT measurement in patients with deep venous thrombosis: utility in diagnosis and judgement of anticoagulant treatment effectiveness. Thromb Haemost 1990; 64: 196-201
9 Chang-Liem GS, Lustermans FAT, van Wersh JWJ. Comparison of the appropriateness of the latex and ELISA plasma D-Dimer determination for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Haemostasis 1991; 21: 106-110
10 Carter CJ, Doyle DL, Dawson N, Fowler S, Devine DV. Investigations into the clinical utility of latex D-Dimer in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69: 08-11
11 Raimondi P, Bongard O, deMoerloose P, Reber G, Waldvogel F, Bounameaux H. D-dimer plasma concentration in various clinical conditions: implication for the use of this test in the diagnostic approach of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res 1993; 69: 125-130
12 Elias A, Aillaud MF, Roul C, Monteil O, Villain P, Serradimigni A, Juhan-Vague I. Assessment of D-dimer measurement by ELISA or Latex methods in deep vein thrombosis diagnosed by ultrasonic duplex scanning. Fibrinolysis 1990; 04: 237-240
13 Heaton DC, Billings JD, Hickton CM. Assessment of D dimer assays for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. J Lab Clin Med 1987; 110: 588-591
14 Ott P, Astrup L, Hartving Jensen R, Nyeland B, Pedersen B. Assessment of D-dimer in plasma: diagnostic value in suspected deep venous thrombosis of the leg. Acta Med Scand 1988; 224: 263-227
15 Bounameaux H, Schneider PA, Reber G, deMoerloose P, Krahenbuhl B. Measurement of plasma D-dimer for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Am J Clin Pathol 1989; 91: 82-85
16 Nilsson L. Evaluation of latex D-dimer tests. J Intern Med 1994; 236: 691-692
17 Charles LA, Edwards T, Macik BG. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of six D-dimer latex assays. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994; 118: 1102-1105
18 Chapman CS, Akhtar N, Campbell S, Miles K, O’Connor J, Mitchell VE. The use of D-Dimer assay by enzyme immunoassay and latex agglutination techniques in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Clin Lab Haemat 1990; 12: 37-42
19 Boerde WA, Haande MA, Huisman JW, Klaassen CHL. D-Dimer latex assay as screening method in suspected deep venous thrombosis of the leg. A clinical study and review of the literature. Neth J Med 1991; 38: 65-69
20 Wells PS, Lensing AWA, Davidson BL, Prins MH, Hirsh J. Accuracy of ultrasound for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients after orthopedic surgery. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 1995; 122: 47-53
21 Lensing AW, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, Huisman PM, Vigo M, Tomasella G, Krekt J, ten Cate JW, Huisman MV, Biiller HR. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 342-345
22 Adema E, Gebert U. Pooled patient samples as reference material for D-Dimer. Thromb Res 1995; 80: 85-88
23 Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 08: 283-298
24 Wells PS, Brill EdwardsP, Stevens P, Panju A, Patel A, Douketis E, Massicotte MP, Hirsh J, Weitz JI, Kearon C, Ginsberg JS. A novel and rapid whole-blood assay for D-dimer in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Circulation 1995; 91: 2184-2187
25 deMoerloose P, Desmarais S, Bounameaux H, Reber P, Perrier A, Dupuy G, Pittet JL. Contribution of a new rapid, individual and quantitative automated D-Dimer ELISA to exclude pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 1996; 75: 11-13
26 D’Angelo A, D’Alessandro G, Tomassini L, Pittet JL, Dupuy G, Crippa L. Evaluation of a new rapid quantitative D-dimer assay in patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1996; 75: 412-416