CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Neuroanaesth Crit Care 2018; 05(02): 108-110
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1654752
Case Report
Indian Society of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care

Systemic Intravenous Thrombolysis for Massive Pulmonary Embolism after Intracranial Surgery for Traumatic Head Injury: When Absolute Becomes Relative!

Varun Jain
1   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
,
Harsh Sapra
2   Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Medanta—The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
,
Deepak Bhangale
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Medanta—The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 21 February 2018

Accepted: 21 April 2018

Publication Date:
12 May 2018 (online)

Abstract

Intravenous thrombolysis is the preferred treatment for massive pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic instability, when there are no contraindications to the therapy. However, when absolute contraindications to thrombolysis are present, clinicians are at a crux, especially when mechanical thrombectomy is also not possible. We present a case of a 40-year-old man with polytrauma with head injury who developed massive pulmonary embolism requiring intravenous thrombolysis on day 15 after decompressive craniotomy—possibly a first in the literature. The patient, however, successfully recovered from this near-fatal episode. With this report, we wish to highlight that at a near-dying situation, no contraindication is absolute, and all possible efforts must be made by the clinician to save the patient.

 
  • References

  • 1 Tracy BM, Dunne JR, O'Neal CM, Clayton E. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in neurosurgical trauma patients. J Surg Res 2016; 205 (01) 221-227
  • 2 Bottinor W, Turlington J, Raza S. et al. Life-saving systemic thrombolysis in a patient with massive pulmonary embolism and a recent hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident. Tex Heart Inst J 2014; 41 (02) 174-176
  • 3 Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J. et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest 2016; 149 (02) 315-352
  • 4 Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams Jr HP. et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013; 44 (03) 870-947
  • 5 Vedantham S, Piazza G, Sista AK, Goldenberg NA. Guidance for the use of thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2016; 41 (01) 68-80
  • 6 Akimoto T, Yamazaki T, Kusano E, Nagata D. Therapeutic dilemmas regarding anticoagulation: an experience in a patient with nephrotic syndrome, pulmonary embolism, and traumatic brain injury. Clin Med Insights Case Rep 2016; 9: 103-107
  • 7 Fred HL. Is it ever wise to disregard absolute practice guidelines? Absolutely. Tex Heart Inst J 2014; 41 (02) 177-178
  • 8 Bayram B, Oray NÇ, Korkmaz E, Erdost HA, Gokmen N. Massive pulmonary embolism and cardiac arrest; thrombolytic therapy in a patient with recent intracranial surgery and glioblastoma multiforme. Am J Emerg Med 2014; 32 (11) 1441.e1-1441.e3
  • 9 Mercer RM, Bowen JST, Armstrong RJ. All contraindications to thrombolysis for life-threatening pulmonary embolus should be considered relative. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013: bcr2013009724
  • 10 Nyquist P, Bautista C, Jichici D. et al. Prophylaxis of venous thrombosis in neurocritical care patients: an evidence-based guideline: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society. Neurocrit Care 2016; 24 (01) 47-60
  • 11 Barba R, Di Micco P, Blanco-Molina A. et al. Fever and deep venous thrombosis. Findings from the RIETE registry. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011; 32 (03) 288-292