Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Joints 2018; 06(02): 110-115
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653949
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Postoperative Complications and Reoperation Rates Following Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fracture

Armando Macera
1   Hospital Universitario Infanta Elena, Madrid, Spain
,
Christian Carulli
2   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
,
Luigi Sirleo
2   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
,
Massimo Innocenti
2   Orthopaedic Clinic, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

01 September 2017

08 April 2018

Publication Date:
21 May 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to determinate the overall postoperative complication and reoperation rates related to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures.

Methods All patients who had undergone an ankle fracture operation at our institution from January 2005 through December 2013 were identified by querying the hospital surgical procedure database for diagnoses codes. Medical records, surgical procedure, and outpatient control reports were reviewed to collect pre-, intra-, and postoperative details. All data obtained were retrospectively analyzed by the authors to evaluate the postoperative complications and the type of further surgical treatment required to treat them.

Results A total of 378 consecutive patients were included in the study. Overall complications rate was 36.0%. Minor complications (4.5%) were represented by superficial infection (1.3%) and impaired wound healing (3.2%). All these patients required advanced wound care and prolonged oral antibiotics. Major complications (31.5%) included: residual pain (17.2%), deep infection (3.4%), malunion (2.4%), posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis (5.0%), implant breakage (0.3%), complex regional pain syndrome (1.3%), and arthrofibrosis (1.9%). Note that 21.7% of major complications required further surgical procedure. Reoperations included arthroscopic debridement (15.1%), hardware removal and debridement of all necrotic tissue (4.5%), and ankle fusion (2.1%). Surgery was necessary mainly for pain removal and function recovery.

Conclusion Ankle fracture ORIF represents a satisfying surgical treatment. Nevertheless, postoperative complications are not uncommon. Minor complications can be easily managed with medications and repeated outpatient controls. Reoperation is occasionally required to treat major complications. Revision surgery is mandatory to ensure pain relief and function improvement.

Level of Evidence Level II, retrospective cohort study.

Keywords

ankle fracture - open reduction and internal fixation postoperative - complication - reoperation
 

  • References

  • 1 Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 2006; 37 (08) 691-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tadros AM, Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. Epidemiology of foot injury in a high-income developing country. Injury 2010; 41 (02) 137-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 SooHoo NF, Krenek L, Eagan MJ, Gurbani B, Ko CY, Zingmond DS. Complication rates following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (05) 1042-1049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Seland K, Cherry N, Beach J. A study of factors influencing return to work after wrist or ankle fractures. Am J Ind Med 2006; 49 (03) 197-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Asloum Y, Bedin B, Roger T, Charissoux JL, Arnaud JP, Mabit C. Internal fixation of the fibula in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized and comparative study: plating versus nailing. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2014; 100 (4, Suppl): S255-S259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ovaska M. Complications in ankle fracture surgery. Acta Orthop Suppl 2015; 86 (358) 1-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kannus P, Palvanen M, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Järvinen M. Increasing number and incidence of low-trauma ankle fractures in elderly people: Finnish statistics during 1970-2000 and projections for the future. Bone 2002; 31 (03) 430-433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schepers T, De Vries MR, Van Lieshout EMM, Van der Elst M. The timing of ankle fracture surgery and the effect on infectious complications; a case series and systematic review of the literature. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (03) 489-494
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Thangarajah T, Prasad PS, Narayan B. Surgical site infections following open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. Open Orthop J 2009; 3 (03) 56-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ebraheim NA, Mekhail AO, Gargasz SS. Ankle fractures involving the fibula proximal to the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int 1997; 18 (08) 513-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Leyes M, Torres R, Guillén P. Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Clin 2003; 8 (01) 131-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Medicode (Firm). ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification. Salt Lake City, UT: Medicode; 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Rüedi TP, Buckley RE, Moran CG. AO Principles of Fracture Management. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hunt KJ, Hurwit D. Use of patient-reported outcome measures in foot and ankle research. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (16) e118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Olerud C, Molander H. A scoring scale for symptom evaluation after ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1984; 103 (03) 190-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992; 13 (10) 606-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Weber BG. Die verletzungen des oberen sprunggelenkes. 2nd ed. Berne: Verlag Hans Huber; 1972
    Google Scholar
  • 18 van Bergen CJ, Gerards RM, Opdam KT, Terra MP, Kerkhoffs GM. Diagnosing, planning and evaluating osteochondral ankle defects with imaging modalities. World J Orthop 2015; 6 (11) 944-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Moon JS, Shim JC, Suh JS, Lee WC. Radiographic predictability of cartilage damage in medial ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (08) 2188-2197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 van Dijk CN, Tol JL, Verheyen CC. A prospective study of prognostic factors concerning the outcome of arthroscopic surgery for anterior ankle impingement. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25 (06) 737-745
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kijowski R, Blankenbaker D, Stanton P, Fine J, De Smet A. Arthroscopic validation of radiographic grading scales of osteoarthritis of the tibiofemoral joint. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (03) 794-799
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88 (07) 909-913
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Witteveen AGH, Hofstad CJ, Kerkhoffs GMMJ. Hyaluronic acid and other conservative treatment options for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (10) CD010643
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hendrickx RP, Stufkens SA, de Bruijn EE, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM. Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32 (10) 940-947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, De Vries MR, Van der Elst M. Increased rates of wound complications with locking plates in distal fibular fractures. Injury 2011; 42 (10) 1125-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Van Son MA, De Vries J, Roukema JA, Den Oudsten BL. Health status, health-related quality of life, and quality of life following ankle fractures: a systematic review. Injury 2013; 44 (11) 1391-1402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Zalavras CG, Christensen T, Rigopoulos N, Holtom P, Patzakis MJ. Infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (07) 1715-1720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lee MS, Grossman JP. Complications in Foot and Ankle Surgery: Management Strategies. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Zalavras CG, Christensen T, Rigopoulos N, Holtom P, Patzakis MJ. Infection following operative treatment of ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (07) 1715-1720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Viol A, Pradka SP, Baumeister SP. , et al. Soft-tissue defects and exposed hardware: a review of indications for soft-tissue reconstruction and hardware preservation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123 (04) 1256-1263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Backes M, Schep NW, Luitse JS, Goslings JC, Schepers T. The effect of postoperative wound infections on functional outcome following intra-articular calcaneal fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135 (08) 1045-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Goost H, Wimmer MD, Barg A, Kabir K, Valderrabano V, Burger C. Fractures of the ankle joint: investigation and treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014; 111 (21) 377-388
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lindsjö U. Operative treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations. A follow-up study of 306/321 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; (199) 28-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lübbeke A, Salvo D, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P, Holzer N, Assal M. Risk factors for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: an eighteen year follow-up study. Int Orthop 2012; 36 (07) 1403-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Fleischer GM, Warncke P. Late results following ankle joint osteosyntheses [in German]. Zentralbl Chir 1989; 114 (06) 381-387
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Müller J, Plaass U, Willenegger H. Late results after surgically treated malleolar fractures. II [in German]. Helv Chir Acta 1971; 38 (03) 329-337
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Brown OL, Dirschl DR, Obremskey WT. Incidence of hardware-related pain and its effect on functional outcomes after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2001; 15 (04) 271-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Chaudhary SB, Liporace FA, Gandhi A, Donley BG, Pinzur MS, Lin SS. Complications of ankle fracture in patients with diabetes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008; 16 (03) 159-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Dawe EJ, Jukes CP, Ganesan K, Wee A, Gougoulias N. Ankle arthroscopy to manage sequelae after ankle fractures. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (11) 3393-3397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Redfern DJ, Sauvé PS, Sakellariou A. Investigation of incidence of superficial peroneal nerve injury following ankle fracture. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24 (10) 771-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Utsugi K, Sakai H, Hiraoka H, Yashiki M, Mogi H. Intra-articular fibrous tissue formation following ankle fracture: the significance of arthroscopic debridement of fibrous tissue. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (01) 89-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Srinivasan CM, Moran CG. Internal fixation of ankle fractures in the very elderly. Injury 2001; 32 (07) 559-563
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Leach WJ, Fordyce MJ. Audit of ankle fracture fixation in the elderly. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1994; 39 (02) 124-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lee YS, Chen SW. Lateral fixation of open AO type-B2 ankle fractures: the Knowles pin versus plate. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (04) 1135-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Miller AG, Margules A, Raikin SM. Risk factors for wound complications after ankle fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (22) 2047-2052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Weatherall JM, Mroczek K, McLaurin T, Ding B, Tejwani N. Post-traumatic ankle arthritis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2013; 71 (01) 104-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A (02) 219-228
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Buck P, Morrey BF, Chao EY. The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987; 69 (07) 1052-1062
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Beerthuizen A, Stronks DL, Van't Spijker A. , et al. Demographic and medical parameters in the development of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1): prospective study on 596 patients with a fracture. Pain 2012; 153 (06) 1187-1192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Rewhorn MJ, Leung AH, Gillespie A, Moir JS, Miller R. Incidence of complex regional pain syndrome after foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg 2014; 53 (03) 256-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Reuben SS. Preventing the development of complex regional pain syndrome after surgery. Anesthesiology 2004; 101 (05) 1215-1224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar