Varicose Vein Stripping - A Prospective Study of the Thrombotic Risk and the Diagnostic Significance of Preoperative Color Coded Duplex Sonography

Summary

Insufficiency of epifascial veins promotes venous ulceration and increases thromboembolic risk in general surgery patients. Epifascial varicose vein stripping is therefore considered the most effective prophylactic procedure. Thromboembolic risk of patients undergoing this surgical procedure has not yet been prospectively evaluated but appears to be lower than in general surgery patients. The gold standard of preoperative assessment of varicose surgery patients is ascending pressure phlebography, but this technique is invasive, time consuming and costly.

We prospectively investigated 100 consecutive varicose vein surgery patients for postoperative thrombosis. Ascending pressure phlebography (APP) and colour coded duplex sonography (CCDS) were performed before and 10 to 21 days after the stripping operation in 100 and 70 patients, respectively.

APP revealed no postoperative deep vein thrombosis in all 100 limbs investigated (0 percent; 95 percent confidence interval: 0 to 2.95). With regard to epifascial vein reflux there was good agreement between APP and CCDS (quadratic weighted kappa: 0.76). In 67 out of 73 superficial veins investigated excellent agreement of diagnostic accuracy was found for both diagnostic procedures (91.78 percent; 95 percent confidence interval: 82.96 to 96.92).

We conclude that thrombotic risk of varicose vein surgery is low in properly selected patients. CCDS provides a high degree of accuracy in diagnosis of reflux and regular vein morphology and should therefore replace APP; however, APP does remain essential in the preoperative workup of a typical anatomical variants.

• References

• 1 Widmer LK. Venenkrankheiten, Häufigkeit und sozialmedizinische Bedeutung: Basler Studie III. Bern: Huber; 1978
• 2 Hach-Wunderle V. Die sekundäre Popliteal- und Femoralveneninsuffi- zienz. Phlebologie 1992; 21: 52-58
• 3 Payne SP, London NJ M, Jagger C, Newland CJ, Barrie WW, Bell PR. Clinical significance of venous reflux detected by duplex scanning. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 39-41
• 4 Nicolaides AN. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. European Consensus Statement, 1-5 November 1991, developed at Oakley Court Hotel, Windsor UK: Int Angiology; 1992. 11 151-159
• 5 Sarin S, Scurr JH, Coleridge SmithP. Assessment of stripping the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 889-893
• 6 Corbett CR R, Runcie IJ, Lea Thomas M, Jamieson CW. Reason to strip the long saphenous vein. Phlebologie 1988; 41: 766-769
• 7 May R. Varicose Veins. In: Surgery of the Veins of the Leg and Pelvis. May R. ed Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag; 1979: 82-95
• 8 McNamara MF, Takaki HS, Yao JS T. Venous disease. Surg Clin North Am 1977; 57: 1201-1220
• 9 Keith LM, Smead WL. Saphenous Vein Stripping and Its Complications. Surg Clin North Am 1983; 63: 1303-1312
• 10 Lofgren EP, Coates HL, O’Brien PC. Clinically Suspect Pulmonary Embolism After Vein Stripping. Mayo Clin Proc 1976; 51: 77-80
• 11 Hach-Wunderle V. Thromboseprophylaxe nach chirurgischen Eingriffen am Venensystem. VASA Suppl 1992; 35: 110-114
• 12 Baker SR, Bumand KG, Sommerville KM, Lea Thomas m, Wilson NM, Browse NL. Comparison of venous reflux assessed by duplex scanning and descending phlebography in chronic venous disease. Lancet 1993; 341: 400-403
• 13 Lea Thomas M. Phlebography of the lower limb. Churchill Livingstone; 1982
• 14 Hach W. Phlebographie der Bein- und Beckenvenen. 1985. Schnetztor, Konstanz:
• 15 Mitchell DC, Grasty MS, Stebbings WS L, Nockler IB, Lewars MD, Levison RA, Wood RF M. Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and venography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 611-613
• 16 Cohen J. Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement with Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit. Psychological Bulletin 1960; 70: 213-220
• 17 Lindblad B, Stemby NH, Bergqvist D. Incidence of venous thromboembolism verified by necropsy over 30 years. Brit. Med. J 1991; 302: 709-711
• 18 Clagett GP, Reisch JS. Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in General Surgical Patients. Ann Surg 1988; 208: 227-240
• 19 Scurr JH, Coleridge-Smith PD, Hasty JH. Deep venous thrombosis: a continuing problem. Br Med J 1988; 297: 28
• 20 Huber O, Bounameaux H, Borst F, Rohner A. Postoperative Pulmonary Embolism After Hospital Discharge. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 310-313
• 21 Markel A, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Strandness DE. Pattern and Distribution of Thrombi in Acute Venous Thrombosis. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 305-309
• 22 Philbrick JT, Becker DM. Calf deep venous thrombosis: a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 2131-2138
• 23 Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, Jay RM, Ockelford PA, Buller HR, Turpie AG, Powers P, Kinch D, Dodd PE, Gill GJ, Leclerc JRand. Diagnostic efficacy of impedance plethysmography for clinically suspect deep vein thrombosis: a randomized study. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 21-28
• 24 Mostbeck A, Partsch H, König H, König B. Lungenembolie bei BeinBeckenvenenthrombose. Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 1980; 92: 464-471
• 25 Bettina RM. Molecular basis of thrombosis. In: Protein C and related proteins. Bettina RM. ed Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1988. pp 1-20
• 26 Parvulesco J. La prevention des complications thromboembolique post-operatoires par Clexane (heparine des badpoids moleculaire) dans la chirurgie des varices. VASA Suppl 1989; 27: 117-119