Thromb Haemost 1995; 73(04): 592-596
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1653826
Original Articles
Clinical Studies
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

The Utility of Non-invasive Tests for Detection of Previous Proximal-vein Thrombosis

Sabina Villalta
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Paolo Prandoni
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Alberto Cogo
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Paola Bagatella
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Andrea Piccioli
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Enrico Bernardi
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Paolo Simioni
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Luigi Scarano
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
,
Antonio Girolami
The Institute of Medical Semeiotics, University Hospital of Padova, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 10 October 1994

Accepted after revision 21 December 1994

Publication Date:
09 July 2018 (online)

Summary

Background. Despite the availability of several diagnostic methods for the detection of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT), the identification of previous episodes of DVT remains a diagnostic challenge.

Study objective. To assess the reliability of a combination of a standardized clinical score with three non-invasive tests: compression ultrasonography (CUS), Doppler ultrasound (DUS), and photoplethysmography (PPG), in determining the presence or the absence of previous proximal DVT.

Methods. One hundred consecutive unselected outpatients were identified, who had undergone contrast venography six to nine years previously because of the clinical suspicion of DVT (confirmed in 43). They were blindly reinvestigated by a panel of trained operators unaware of venography results. They underwent a clinical evaluation of the lower limb, by applying a standardized score to five symptoms and six signs (grading each item from 0 to 3); a PPG test to determine the venous refilling time; a DUS test to determine the venous reflux separately in the common femoral and the popliteal vein; and a CUS test to determine vein compressibility in the same regions.

Results. An abnormal CUS test and/or the demonstration of venous reflux in the popliteal region and/or a high clinical score (≥ 8) identified twenty-four of the 43 (56%) DVT + patients with a specificity of 89%. The combination of normal CUS with the absence of venous reflux in both the common femoral and popliteal vein and a low clinical score excluded previous thrombosis in 45 (79%) of the 57 DVT- patients (negative predictive value, 78%). Abnormal venous reflux in the isolated common femoral vein did not reliably predict the presence or absence of previous DVT. However, this occurred in only 13 (13%) patients. The PPG determination of venous refilling time did not improve the results obtained with the other tests.

Conclusions. The combination of a standardized clinical evaluation with the results of CUS and DUS can reliably diagnose or exclude previous proximal-vein thrombosis in almost 90% of patients with previous episodes of suspected DVT.

 
  • References

  • 1 Prandoni P, Lensing AW A, Büller HR, Polistena P, Carta M, Villalta S, Cogo A, ten Cate JW. Symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and the postthrombotic syndrome. Thromb Haemost 1993; 69: 2379a
  • 2 Brandjes DP M, Heijboer H, de Rijk M, Jagt J, Büller HR, ten Cate JW, Huisman MV. The effect of a graded compression stockings on the development of the post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with proximal deep- vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1991; 65: 1568a
  • 3 Browse NL, Clemenson G, Lea Thomas M. Is the post-phlebitic leg always post-phlebitic? Relation between phlebographie appearance of deep-vein thrombosis and late sequelae. Br Med J 1981; 281: 1167-1170
  • 4 Rosch J, Dotter CT, Seaman AJ, Porter JM, Common HH. Healing of deep venous thrombosis: venographic findings in a randomized study comparing streptokinase and heparin. AJR 1976; 127: 553-558
  • 5 Ginsberg JS, Shin A, Turpie AG G, Hirsh J. Detection of previous proximal venous thrombosis with Doppler ultrasonography and photoplethysmography. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 2255-2257
  • 6 Lensing AW A, Prandoni P, Brandjes D, Huisman PM, Vigo M, Tomasella G, Krekt J, ten Cate JW, Huisman MV, Büller HR. Detection of deep-vein thrombosis by real-time B-mode ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 342-345
  • 7 Prandoni P, Cogo A, Bemardi E, Villalta S, Polistena P, Simioni P, Noventa F, Benedetti L, Girolami A. A simple ultrasound approach for detection of recurrent proximal-vein thrombosis. Circulation 1993; 88: 1730-1735
  • 8 Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Huisman MV, Jonker JJ, Vigo M, Borm JJ, Büller HR, Sing AK, Carta M, ten Cate JW. A new computerized impedance plethysmography in the detection of proximal deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients. Thromb Haemost 1991; 65: 229-232
  • 9 Lensing AW A, Levi MM, Büller HR, Prandoni P, Vigo M, Agnelli G, Lupatelli L, Huisman MV, ten Cate JW. An objective Doppler method for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113: 9-14
  • 10 Prandoni P, Lensing AW A, Büller HR, Carta M, Cogo A, Vigo M, Casara D, Ruol A, ten Cate JW. Comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular- weight heparin with intravenous standard heparin in proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1992; 339: 441-445
  • 11 Arora S, Lam DJ, Kennedy C, Meier GH, Gusberg RJ, Negus D. Light reflection rheography: a simple noninvasive screening test for deep vein thrombosis. J Vase Surg 1993; 18: 767-772
  • 12 Lensing AW A, Hirsh J, Büller HR. Diagnosis of venous thrombosis. In: Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Basic principles and clinical practice. Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Salzman EW. eds Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1993: 1297-1321
  • 13 European Consensus Statement. Prevention of venous thromboembolism. Intern Angiol 1992; 11: 151-159
  • 14 Hirsh J, Prins MH, Samama M. Approach to the thrombophilie patient for hemostasis and thrombosis: basic principles and clinical practice. In: Hemostasis and Thrombosis. Basic principles and clinical practice. Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder VJ, Salzman EW. eds Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company; 1993: 1543-1561
  • 15 Villalta S, Bagatella P, Piccioli A, Lensing AW A, Prins M, Prandoni P. Assessment of validity and reproducibility of a clinical score for the postthrombotic syndrome. Hemostasis 1994; 24 Suppl (Suppl. 01) 58a
  • 16 Cogo A, Lensing AW A, Prandoni P, Hirsh J. Distribution of thrombosis in patients with symptomatic deep vein thrombosi. Implications for simplifying the diagnostic approach with compression ultrasound Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 2777-2780
  • 17 Davidson BL, Elliott CG, Lensing AW A. Low accuracy of color-Doppler in the detection of proximal leg vein thrombosis in asymptomatic high-risk patien. Ann Intern Med 111 33: 75-78