Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31(04): 279-284
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1651499
Original Research
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Sonoelastographic Features of the Patellar Ligament in Clinically Normal Dogs

Angela P. Piccionello
1   School of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, Italy
,
Daniele Serrani
1   School of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, Italy
,
Valeria Busoni
2   Department of Imaging, Faculté de Médicine Vétérinaire, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
,
Alberto Salvaggio
1   School of Bioscience and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Matelica, Italy
,
Mattia Bonazzi
3   Casa di Cura Veterinaria San Geminiano, Modena, Italy
,
Chiara Bergamino
4   Department of Diagnostic Imaging, School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, College of Agriculture Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
,
Antonella Volta
5   Department of Veterinary Science, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
Further Information

Publication History

06 November 2017

26 March 2018

Publication Date:
11 June 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This article describes the sonoelastographic features of the patellar ligament of sound dogs and tests feasibility, reproducibility and repeatability.

Methods Clinically healthy medium-to-large breed dogs were enrolled. Sonoelastographic images of the patellar ligaments were obtained in lateral recumbency with the stifle flexed by an experienced operator and by a senior veterinary student. The elasticity colour map included red (soft), green (intermediate) and blue (hard). Tissue elasticity was measured by calculating the percentage of softness with dedicated software. Categorical, qualitative data analysis was performed using a weighted kappa statistic for repeatability and reproducibility. A categorical qualitative assessment was performed based on a grading scale of 1 to 5 (soft, mostly soft, intermediate, mostly hard and hard).

Results Fourteen clinically normal dogs were considered. A total of 28 patellar ligaments were examined. Overall, 25 of the patellar ligaments were graded as soft or mostly soft and the remaining 3 as intermediate. Repeatability was 86.2%, with a weighted kappa of 0.64 (good), for the well-trained sonographer and 83.3%, with a weighted kappa of 0.53 (moderate), for the senior student. Reproducibility was 86.2%, with a weighed kappa of 0.65 (good).

Clinical Significance Sonoelastography of the canine patellar ligament is a feasible and reproducible technique. Patellar ligaments in clinically normal dogs showed highly elastic biomechanical properties.

Keywords

patellar ligament - desmopathy - sonoelastography - dog

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Wolf RE, Scavelli TD, Hoelzler MG, Fulcher RP, Bastian RP. Surgical and postoperative complications associated with tibial tuberosity advancement for cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: 458 cases (2007-2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2012; 240 (12) 1481-1487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kühn K, Ohlerth S, Makara M, Hässig M, Guerrero TG. Radiographic and ultrasonographic evaluation of the patellar ligament following tibial tuberosity advancement. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2011; 52 (04) 466-471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Stauffer KD, Tuttle TA, Elkins AD, Wehrenberg AP, Character BJ. Complications associated with 696 tibial plateau leveling osteotomies (2001-2003). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2006; 42 (01) 44-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pettitt R, Cripps P, Baker M, Hattersley R, Lorenz N, McConnell F. Radiographic and ultrasonographic changes of the patellar ligament following tibial tuberosity advancement in 25 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2014; 27 (03) 216-221
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Boudrieau RJ. Tibial plateau leveling osteotomy or tibial tuberosity advancement?. Vet Surg 2009; 38 (01) 1-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hodgson RJ, O'connor PJ, Grainger AJ. Tendon and ligament imaging. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 1157-1172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Pedersen M, Freedberg U, Langberg H. Sonoelastography as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of muscoloskeletal alteration: a systematic review. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 441-446
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Ooi CC, Schneider ME, Malliaras P, Chadwick M, Connell DA. Diagnostic performance of axial-strain sonoelastography in confirming clinically diagnosed Achilles tendinopathy: comparison with B-mode ultrasound and color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41 (01) 15-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Pedersen M, Fredberg U, Langberg H. Sonoelastography as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of musculoskeletal alterations: a systematic review. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33 (05) 441-446
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pennick D, D'Anjou MA. Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2015: 495
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Carr JC, Hanly S, Griffin J, Gibney R. Sonography of the patellar tendon and adjacent structures in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176 (06) 1535-1539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Muir P. Advances in the Canine Cruciate Ligament. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons and ACVS Foundation; 2010: 117-121
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Yamamoto Y, Yamaguchi S, Sasho T. , et al. Quantitative ultrasound elastography with an acoustic coupler for Achilles tendon elasticity: measurement repeatability and normative values. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35 (01) 159-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Garra BS. Imaging and estimation of tissue elasticity by ultrasound. Ultrasound Q 2007; 23 (04) 255-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Klauser AS, Faschingbauer R, Jaschke WR. Is sonoelastography of value in assessing tendons?. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010; 14 (03) 323-333
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Ultrasound elastography for musculoskeletal applications. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 (1019): 1435-1445
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sadigh G, Carlos RC, Neal CH, Dwamena BA. Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign breast abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2012; 134 (03) 923-931
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E. , et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239 (02) 341-350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Correas JM, Drakonakis E, Isidori AM. , et al. Update on ultrasound elastography: miscellanea. Prostate, testicle, musculo-skeletal. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82 (11) 1904-1912
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Herrmann E. , et al. Real-time elastography for noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188 (03) 758-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shiraishi A, Hiraoka A, Aibiki T. , et al. Real-time tissue elastography: non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease due to HCV. Hepatogastroenterology 2014; 61 (135) 2084-2090
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Janssen J, Schlörer E, Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65 (07) 971-978
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ragazzoni F, Deandrea M, Mormile A. , et al. High diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability of real-time elastography in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol 2012; 38 (07) 1154-1162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dudea SM, Botar-Jid C, Dumitriu D, Vasilescu D, Manole S, Lenghel ML. Differentiating benign from malignant superficial lymph nodes with sonoelastography. Med Ultrason 2013; 15 (02) 132-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gong X, Wang Y, Xu P. Application of real-time ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of breast tumors. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32 (12) 2171-2176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P. , et al. Real-time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience. BJU Int 2007; 100 (01) 42-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Xie M, Zhang X, Zhan J, Hua K. Application of real-time ultrasound elastography for discrimination of low- and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 2013; 32 (02) 257-262
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Thomas A, Kümmel S, Gemeinhardt O, Fischer T. Real-time sonoelastography of the cervix: tissue elasticity of the normal and abnormal cervix. Acad Radiol 2007; 14 (02) 193-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Drakonaki EE, Allen GM, Wilson DJ. Real-time ultrasound elastography of the normal Achilles tendon: reproducibility and pattern description. Clin Radiol 2009; 64 (12) 1196-1202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, Smekal V, Reindl M, Klauser AS. Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy Achilles tendons. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (02) W134-W138
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V. , et al. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic Achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31 (04) 394-400
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Cimmino MA. Sonoelastography in the evaluation of painful Achilles tendon in amateur athletes. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2010; 28 (03) 373-378
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ooi CC, Richards PJ, Maffulli N. , et al. A soft patellar tendon on ultrasound elastography is associated with pain and functional deficit in volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport 2016; 19 (05) 373-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Klauser AS, Miyamoto H, Tamegger M. , et al. Achilles tendon assessed with sonoelastography: histologic agreement. Radiology 2013; 267 (03) 837-842
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 LaCroix AS, Duenwald-Kuehl SE, Lakes RS, Vanderby Jr R. Relationship between tendon stiffness and failure: a metaanalysis. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2013; 115 (01) 43-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Jeon S, Lee G, Lee SK. , et al. Ultrasonographic elastography of the liver, spleen, kidneys and prostate in clinically normal beagle dogs. [corrected] Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2015; 56: 425-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 White J, Gay J, Farnsworth R, Mickas M, Kim K, Mattoon J. Ultrasound elastography of the liver, spleen, and kidneys in clinically normal cats. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55 (04) 428-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lustgarten M, Redding WR, Labens R, Morgan M, Davis W, Seiler GS. Elastographic characteristics of the metacarpal tendons in horses without clinical evidence of tendon injury. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2014; 55 (01) 92-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Lustgarten M, Redding WR, Labens R. , et al. Elastographic evaluation of naturally occurring tendon and ligament injuries of the equine distal limb. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2015; 56 (06) 670-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ozcan AN, Tan S, Tangal NG. , et al. Real-time sonoelastography of the patellar and quadriceps tendons: pattern description in professional athletes and healthy volunteers. Med Ultrason 2016; 18 (03) 299-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Porta F, Damjanov N, Galluccio F, Iagnocco A, Matucci-Cerinic M. Ultrasound elastography is a reproducible and feasible tool for the evaluation of the patellar tendon in healthy subjects. Int J Rheum Dis 2014; 17 (07) 762-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Berko NS, Mehta AK, Levin TL, Schulz JF. Effect of knee position on the ultrasound elastography appearance of the patellar tendon. Clin Radiol 2015; 70 (10) 1083-1086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zhang ZJ, Ng GY, Lee WC, Fu SN. Changes in morphological and elastic properties of patellar tendon in athletes with unilateral patellar tendinopathy and their relationship with pain and functional disability. PLoS One 2014; 9: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar