Thromb Haemost 1987; 57(03): 332-336
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1651128
Original Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Using a Monoclonal Antibody to Identify Patients with Type I and Type II von Willebrand’s Disease

Authors

  • Jeffrey D Hall

    The U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Host Factors, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • Dean W Willis

    The U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Host Factors, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • Bruce L Evatt

    The U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Host Factors, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • Debra W Jackson

    The U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Host Factors, Atlanta, GA, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Received 13 March 1986

Accepted after revision 26 February 1987

Publication Date:
06 July 2018 (online)

Summary

Three monoclonal antibodies produced against vWF:Ag by conventional hybridoma technique did not inhibit factor VIII coagulant activity (F.VIII:C) but did inhibit VIII ristocetin cofactor activity. The antibodies were used in an indirect competitive ELISA for quantifying von Willebrand’s antigen (vWF: Ag) and compared with values obtained by the Laurell technique using commercial antibody by means of a ratio: ELISA/Laurell. For one monoclonal BD2-CC9, vWF:Ag values obtained in the two assays were in good agreement for normal and hemophilia A plasmas (normal, n = 19, ratio = 1.13 ± .17, hemophilia A, n = 10, ratio = 0.91 ± .15). However, type II vWD patients had a disproportionately low value of vWF: Ag with the ELISA. Use of the ratio normalized the difference among individual plasma values and allowed a significant separation of type II vWD plasma (n = 9, ratio = 0.46 ± .19) from normal plasma (p = .0001) and type I vWD plasma (n = 8, ratio = 1.52 ± .34) from type II vWD plasma (p = .0003) using BD2-CC9. Although the sample size was small, the greater degree of discrimination among the vWD plasmas tested with BD2-CC9 (compared with the other two antibodies [CA3-AE4, CC6-BG10]) suggests that this antibody may recognize conformational epitopes that reflect the degree of multimeric polymerization of the vWF molecule rather than simply recognize a decreased number of antigenic sites in a basic subunit. BD2-CC9 may be valuable in investigating the various types of vWD and/or the process of polymerization of this complex protein.