Thromb Haemost 1993; 70(05): 852-857
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649682
Fibrinolysis
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Multicentre Evaluation of Commercial Kit Methods: Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Activity

J Gram
1   The Section of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ribe County Hospital in Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark
2   The Section for Thrombosis Research, South Jutland University Centre, Esbjerg, Denmark
,
P J Declerck
3   The Center for Thrombosis and Vascular Research, University of Leuven, Leuven Belgium
,
J Sidelmann
1   The Section of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ribe County Hospital in Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark
2   The Section for Thrombosis Research, South Jutland University Centre, Esbjerg, Denmark
,
J Jespersen
1   The Section of Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Ribe County Hospital in Esbjerg, Esbjerg, Denmark
2   The Section for Thrombosis Research, South Jutland University Centre, Esbjerg, Denmark
,
C Kluft
4   The IVVO TNO Gaubius Laboratory, Leiden, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 16 December 1992

Accepted after revision 15 June 1993

Publication Date:
05 July 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

In order to study the analytical performance of different commercial kits for determination of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) activity we distributed eight selected split samples to 11 European laboratories experienced with haemostasis testing. Three different laboratories were involved in the production of data from each of the commercial kits tested. A considerable variation of PAI activity results reported from the laboratories testing the same commercial kits was observed. The range of reported results could in individual samples exceed the median value indicating an interlaboratory variation of more than 100%.

When we harmonized the results reported from different kits in different laboratories by means of an international standard from National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) we still observed that the results produced by some kits deviated systematically from results produced by other kits. Also, the harmonized results were used to estimate the overall coefficient of variation (CV) of PAI activity determined in various laboratories by different kits. We observed an inverse correlation between the PAI activity level and the CV with a CV of about 10Q% for low PAI activity levels and a CV of about 16% for high PAI activity levels. The high imprecision of the kits in the low concentration range of PAI activity indicates that unspecific factors in plasma may interfere with determination of active PAI. This was confirmed by the evaluation of the results from one of the plasma samples, which was PAI-1 depleted. The laboratories involved in the testing reported for this sample a mean value of 6.1 IU/ml.

In conclusion, the currently available kits for determination of PAI activity are not accurate for measurement of PAI-1 in plasma, and the kits give imprecise results particularly at low activity levels.