Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian Journal of Neurosurgery 2018; 07(03): 179-183
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1649332
Original Article
Neurological Surgeons' Society of India

Functional Outcome for Chiari Malformation Using a Novel Scoring System

Anil Kumar
1   Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
,
Nupur Pruthi
2   Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Bhagavatula I. Devi
2   Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Arun K. Gupta
3   Department of Neuroimaging and Interventional Neuroradiology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
› Author Affiliations Funding No funding was received for this research.
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 23 January 2018

accepted: 20 March 2018

Publication Date:
14 May 2018 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background The authors report functional outcomes comparing various surgical techniques, using a Chiari-specific assessment tool. They also intend to externally validate the performance of the CCOS by comparing with gestalt outcome.

Methods Total cohort comprised 73 surgically treated patients, and patients were divided into two groups: patients who were operated upon at the authors’ institute and those who were evaluated at their institute but underwent surgery elsewhere due to various reasons. Functional outcome was evaluated on the basis of the Chicago Chiari outcome scale (CCOS) and gestalt outcome scale. Mean duration of follow-up was 10.23 ± 5.8 months.

Results In the authors’ cohort of 73 patients, 76.70% (n = 56) were improved, 23.30% (n = 17) were unchanged, and none of them deteriorated. The median CCOS was 14 ± 1.34 (range: 11–16). There was no statistical difference in outcome between the different operative groups (foramen magnum decompression, duraplasty, tonsillar resection “other”). The CCOS value of 14 has excellent sensitivity (0.95) and good specificity (0.746) for identifying patients with good gestalt outcome.

Conclusion The authors found a clear correlation between higher CCOS score and gestalt outcome. There was no statistical difference in outcome between the different operative groups.

Keywords

Chiari malformation - syrinx - functional outcome - Chicago Chiari outcome scale - posterior fossa decompression
 

  • References

  • 1 Chiari H. Concerning alterations in the cerebellum resulting from cerebral hydrocephalus. 1891. Pediatr Neurosci 1987; 13 (01) 3-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Novegno F, Caldarelli M, Massa A. et al. The natural history of the Chiari type I anomaly. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008; 2 (03) 179-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McGirt MJ, Nimjee SM, Fuchs HE, George TM. Relationship of cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with outcome after decompression for Chiari I malformations. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (01) 140-146 discussion 140–146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Milhorat TH, Bolognese PA. Tailored operative technique for Chiari type I malformation using intraoperative color Doppler ultrasonography. Neurosurgery 2003; 53 (04) 899-905 discussion 905–906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Di Lorenzo N, Palma L, Palatinsky E, Fortuna A. “Conservative” cranio-cervical decompression in the treatment of syringomyelia-Chiari I complex. A prospective study of 20 adult cases. Spine 1995; 20 (23) 2479-2483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Aliaga L, Hekman KE, Yassari R. et al. A novel scoring system for assessing Chiari malformation type I treatment outcomes. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (03) 656-664 discussion 664–665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Greenberg JK, Milner E, Yarbrough CK. et al. Outcome methods used in clinical studies of Chiari malformation type I: a systematic review. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (02) 262-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hekman KE, Aliaga L, Straus D. et al. Positive and negative predictors for good outcome after decompressive surgery for Chiari malformation type 1 as scored on the Chicago Chiari Outcome Scale. Neurol Res 2012; 34 (07) 694-700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Erdogan E, Cansever T, Secer HI. et al. The evaluation of surgical treatment options in the Chiari malformation type I. Turk Neurosurg 2010; 20 (03) 303-313
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Durham SR, Fjeld-Olenec K. Comparison of posterior fossa decompression with and without duraplasty for the surgical treatment of Chiari malformation type I in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2008; 2 (01) 42-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hayhurst C, Richards O, Zaki H, Findlay G, Pigott TJ. Hindbrain decompression for Chiari-syringomyelia complex: an outcome analysis comparing surgical techniques. Br J Neurosurg 2008; 22 (01) 86-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar