TDABC Cost Analysis of Ocular Disorders in an Ophthalmology Emergency Department versus Urgent Care: Clinical Experience at Massachusetts Eye and EarFunding None.
14. Januar 2018
27. März 2018
07. Mai 2018 (online)
Purpose To perform a cost analysis comparison for managing common ocular disorders in an eye emergency department (ED) versus an urgent care setting using a time-driven activity-based cost model (TDABC) to assist physicians and staff in appropriate allocation of resources at their own institution.
Design Retrospective analysis.
Setting Massachusetts Eye and Ear (MEE) ED and Same-Day Services (SDS), which runs as an urgent care clinic.
Population Patients diagnosed with corneal abrasions, dry eyes, conjunctivitis, and styes were identified between April 2014 and August 2015 (n = 2,408 [ED], 26 [SDS]). We determined resources used in delivery of care, which included personnel, consumables, space capacity, and equipment. Costs were identified based on time the patient spent with each resource.
Main Outcome Average visit length and associated personal, space, equipment, and consumable costs.
Results Average visit length was 196 and 53 minutes, respectively, primarily due to longer wait times in the ED. Personnel and space costs were higher in the ED compared with SDS ($68.92 vs. $51.37 and $24.44 vs. $12.86, respectively). This led to an overall higher total resource cost for patients seen in the ED compared with SDS ($108.41 vs. $81.53, respectively).
Conclusion For common ocular disorders, total SDS costs were 25% less than ED costs at MEE primarily due to personnel and space utilization. Treating patients with nonemergent ocular problems outside the ED can lead to shorter visit times for patients as well as lower overall costs.
- 1 National Health Expenditure Data. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2016 . Available at: CMS.gov
- 2 Andersen R. Medicine's dilemmas: infinite needs versus finite resources. JAMA 1994; 272 (23) 1870-1871
- 3 Porter ME, Lee TH. The strategy that will fix health care. Harv Bus Rev 2013; 91 (10) 50-70
- 4 Channa R, Zafar SN, Canner JK, Haring RS, Schneider EB, Friedman DS. Epidemiology of eye-related emergency department visits. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134 (03) 312-319
- 5 Kaplan RS, Anderson SR. Time-driven activity-based costing. Harv Bus Rev 2004; 82 (11) 131-138 , 150
- 6 Porter ME, Kaplan RS. How to pay for health care. Harv Bus Rev 2016; 94 (7-8): 88-98 , 100, 134
- 7 Kaplan RS, Porter ME. How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv Bus Rev 2011; 89 (09) 46-52 , 54, 56–61
- 8 Yun BJ, Prabhakar AM, Warsh J. , et al. Time-driven activity-based costing in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2016; 67 (06) 765-772
- 9 McLaughlin N, Burke MA, Setlur NP. , et al. Time-driven activity-based costing: a driver for provider engagement in costing activities and redesign initiatives. Neurosurg Focus 2014; 37 (05) E3
- 10 DiGioia III AM, Greenhouse PK, Giarrusso ML, Kress JM. Determining the true cost to deliver total hip and knee arthroplasty over the full cycle of care: preparing for bundling and reference-based pricing. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (01) 1-6
- 11 Mandigo M, O'Neill K, Mistry B. , et al. A time-driven activity-based costing model to improve health-care resource use in Mirebalais, Haiti. Lancet 2015; 385 (Suppl. 02) S22
- 12 Najjar PA, Strickland M, Kaplan RS. Time-driven activity-based costing for surgical episodes. JAMA Surg 2017; 152 (01) 96-97
- 13 French KE, Guzman AB, Rubio AC, Frenzel JC, Feeley TW. Value based care and bundled payments: anesthesia care costs for outpatient oncology surgery using time-driven activity-based costing. Healthc (Amst) 2016; 4 (03) 173-180
- 14 Oklu R, Haas D, Kaplan RS. , et al. Time-driven activity-based costing in IR. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26 (12) 1827-1831
- 15 Porter ME. What is value in health care?. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (26) 2477-2481
- 16 Geiger NF. On tying Medicare reimbursement to patient satisfaction surveys. Am J Nurs 2012; 112 (07) 11
- 17 Bleustein C, Rothschild DB, Valen A, Valatis E, Schweitzer L, Jones R. Wait times, patient satisfaction scores, and the perception of care. Am J Manag Care 2014; 20 (05) 393-400
- 18 Kaplan RS, Haas DA, Warsh J. Adding value by talking more. N Engl J Med 2016; 375 (20) 1918-1920