PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Revista Iberoamericana de Cirugía de la Mano 2018; 46(01): 069-083
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1645874
Update Article | Artículo de Actualización
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Biología del transporte axonal y síndrome de doble compresión

Biology of the Axon Transportation and Double Crush Syndrome
R. S. Rosales
1   Unidad de Cirugía de La Mano y Microcirugía, GECOT, La Laguna, Tenerife, España
,
A. Sánchez Díez de la Lastra
1   Unidad de Cirugía de La Mano y Microcirugía, GECOT, La Laguna, Tenerife, España
,
L. Méndez Hernández
2   Servicio Neurofisiología Hospital Universitario, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
,
A. Dorta Fernández
1   Unidad de Cirugía de La Mano y Microcirugía, GECOT, La Laguna, Tenerife, España
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

26. März 2018

27. März 2018

Publikationsdatum:
11. Mai 2018 (online)

   Lizenzen und Reprints

Resumen

Después de más de 40 años desde la descripción del Síndrome de Doble Compresión por Upton y McComas en el Lancet, sigue siendo un tema debatido que ha llevado a algunos cirujanos de mano a dudar de su existencia. La evidencia científica demuestra que la alteración del transporte axonal es el mecanismo más plausible en la fisiopatología de ese síndrome de compresión nerviosa. Se ha demostrado que una cuidadosa exploración clínica junto a un buen estudio neurofisiológico bien dirigido incrementa la eficiencia diagnóstica en términos de pacientes correctamente diagnosticados en el SDC. La liberación del Ligamento Transverso del Carpo está indicada en determinados pacientes que cumplen unos criterios de inclusión y exclusión específicos. Los resultados demuestran que la liberación del canal carpiano en esa población diana específica, es capaz de mejorar la gravedad de los síntomas de manera similar a la población afecta de Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano y de manera casi similar, a nivel de la Discapacidad de MMSS. Sólo instrumentos genéricos, como el SF-36, han sido capaces de detectar la diferencia a nivel de ciertas dimensiones de la Salud en relación a la Calidad de Vida entre los resultados del tratamiento en SDC y STC.

Abstract

The Double Crush Syndrome (DCS) described by Upton and McComas more than 40 years ago is still a debated issue in nerve compression disorders. The purpose of this review paper was to present the biological bases of the axonal transportation related to the physio-pathology of the DCS and to describe the clinical examination, diagnosis, and the outcomes in the treatment. Scientific evidence stands that impaired axonal transport is the most likely mechanism in producing the DCS. A careful clinical examination combined with a well-directed electrophysiological test increase the efficiency in the diagnosis. Surgical release of the Carpal ligament in DCS is indicated in patients who follow specific inclusion and exclusion criteria and the outcomes is similar to the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) population in terms of improvement of symptoms related to the distal nerve compression, and almost similar in terms of Upper extremity Disability. However, Quality of Life Outcomes Instruments, as SF-36, detect differences between the outcomes in CTS and DCS.

Palabras-Clave

neuropatía - síndrome de túnel carpiano - síndrome de doble compresión - radioculopatía - transporte axonal

Keywords

neuropathy - carpal tunnel syndrome - double crush syndrome - radiculopathy - axonal transport
 

  • Bibliografía

  • 1 Upton AR, McComas AJ. The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet 1973; 2 (7825): 359-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Howard FM. Controversies in nerve entrapment syndromes in the forearm and wrist. Orthop Clin North Am 1986; 17 (03) 375-381
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kwon HK, Hwang M, Yoon DW. Frequency and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome according to level of cervical radiculopathy: double crush syndrome?. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117 (06) 1256-1259
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bednarik J, Kadanka Z, Vohánka S. Median nerve mononeuropathy in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: double crush syndrome?. J Neurol 1999; 246 (07) 544-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cohen BH, Gaspar MP, Daniels AH, Akelman E, Kane PM. Multifocal Neuropathy: Expanding the Scope of Double Crush Syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (12) 1171-1175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Basic scientific and clinical applications of peripheral nerve regeneration. Surg Annu 1988; 20: 59-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Mackinnon SE, Dellon AL. Experimental study of chronic nerve compression. Clinical implications. Hand Clin 1986; 2 (04) 639-650
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE, Seiler 4th WA. Susceptibility of the diabetic nerve to chronic compression. Ann Plast Surg 1988; 20: 117-119 PubMed PMID: 3355055
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dahlin LB, Archer DR, McLean WG. Axonal transport and morphological changes following nerve compression. An experimental study in the rabbit vagus nerve. J Hand Surg [Br] 1993; 18 (01) 106-110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nemoto K, Matsumoto N, Tazaki K, Horiuchi Y, Uchinishi K, Mori Y. The double lesion neuropathy: An experimental study and clinical cases. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12A: 552-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Suzuki Y, Shirai Y. Motor nerve conduction analysis of double crush syndrome in a rabbit model. J Orthop Sci 2003; 8 (01) 69-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Rivera J, Chu PJ, Lewis Jr TL, Arnold DB. The role of Kif5B in axonal localization of Kv1 K(+) channels. Eur J Neurosci 2007; 25 (01) 136-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Beck G, Sugiura Y, Shinzawa K. , et al. Neuroaxonal dystrophy in calcium-independent phospholipase A2β deficiency results from insufficient remodeling and degeneration of mitochondrial and presynaptic membranes. J Neurosci 2011; 31 (31) 11411-11420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Senda T, Yu W. Kinesin cross-bridges between neurosecretory granules and microtubules in the mouse neurohypophysis. Neurosci Lett 1999; 262 (01) 69-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Steuble M, Gerrits B, Ludwig A. , et al. Molecular characterization of a trafficking organelle: dissecting the axonal paths of calsyntenin-1 transport vesicles. Proteomics 2010; 10 (21) 3775-3788
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Curtis R, Tonra JR, Stark JL. , et al. Neuronal injury increases retrograde axonal transport of the neurotrophins to spinal sensory neurons and motor neurons via multiple receptor mechanisms. Mol Cell Neurosci 1998; 12 (03) 105-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ohka S, Yang WX, Terada E, Iwasaki K, Nomoto A. Retrograde transport of intact poliovirus through the axon via the fast transport system. Virology 1998; 250 (01) 67-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rosales RS, Cuadros Romero M, Méndez Hernández L. Síndrome doloroso regional complejo tipo II y neuroma doloroso. En: Luis Gil Santos, Pedro Marquina Sola editores. Cirugía de la Mano. 1rst edition Chapter: 24 Publisher: Ed. Marban Libros. Madrid España: 2017: 299-305
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Rosales RS, Cuadros Romero M. Méndez Hernández L Gil Santos L, Dorta Fernández A. Tratamiento quirúrgico de los síndromes dolorosos regionales complejos tipo II y utilidad de la neurofisiología intra-operatoria. Rev Iberoam Cir Mano 2015; 43 (01) 57-69
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Campenot RB, Eng H. Protein synthesis in axons and its possible functions. J Neurocytol 2000; 29 (11-12): 793-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Molinari III WJ, Elfar JC. The double crush syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (04) 799-801 , quiz 801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schmid AB, Coppieters MW. The double crush syndrome revisited--a Delphi study to reveal current expert views on mechanisms underlying dual nerve disorders. Man Ther 2011; 16 (06) 557-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Slim A. Epidemiological studies. A practical guide. Cambridge: Univeristy Press; 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282 (02) 153-158
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E. Chronic upper extremity pain and co-occurring symptoms in a general population. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49 (05) 697-702
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Papanicolaou GD, McCabe SJ, Firrell J. The prevalence and characteristics of nerve compression symptoms in the general population. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (03) 460-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Lo SF, Chou LW, Meng NH. , et al. Clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic features in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, double crush syndrome, and cervical radiculopathy. Rheumatol Int 2012; 32 (05) 1257-1263
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Osterman AL. The double crush syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am 1988; 19 (01) 147-155
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Henderson WR. Clinical assessment of peripheral nerve injuries; Tinel's test. Lancet 1948; 2 (6534): 801-805
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Dellon AL. The moving two-point discrimination test: clinical evaluation of the quickly adapting fiber/receptor system. J Hand Surg Am 1978; 3 (05) 474-481
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Nakase H, Lida J, Matsuda R, Park YS, Sakaki T. [Clinical study of cervical myeloradiculopathy with carpal tunnel syndrome, double crush syndrome]. No To Shinkei 2005; 57 (10) 883-887
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lister G. The Hand. Diagnosis and Indications.3rd. Edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Spurling RG, Scoville WR. Lateral rupture of the cervical intervertebral disc. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1944; 78: 350-357
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Adson AW. Surgical treatment for symptoms produced by cervical ribs and the scalenus anticus muscle. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1947; 85 (06) 687-700
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Adson AW. Cervical ribs: symptoms, differential diagnosis and indications for section of the insertion of the scalenus anticus muscle. J Int Coll Surg 1951; 16 (05) 546-559
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Wright IS. The neurovascular syndrome produced by hiperabduction of the arms. Am Heart J 1945; 29: 1-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Brannon EW. Cervical rib syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963; 45: 977-998
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Baumgartner F, Nelson RJ, Robertson JM. The rudimentary first rib. A cause of thoracic outlet syndrome with arterial compromise. Arch Surg 1989; 124 (09) 1090-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Roos DB. Transaxillary approach for first rib resection to relieve thoracic outlet syndrome. Ann Surg 1966; 163 (03) 354-358 PubMed PMID: 5907559; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1476874
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Stevens JC. AAEE minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1987; 10 (02) 99-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ross MA, Kimura J. AAEM case report #2: the carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1995; 18 (06) 567-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Campion D. Electrodiagnostic testing in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (06) 947-956
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Wilbourn AJ, Aminoff MJ. AAEE minimonograph #32: the electrophysiologic examination in patients with radiculopathies. Muscle Nerve 1988; 11 (11) 1099-1114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Anastasopoulos D, Chroni E. Effect of carpal tunnel syndrome on median nerve proximal conduction estimated by F-waves. J Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 14 (01) 63-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Cheng CJ, Mackinnon-Patterson B, Beck JL, Mackinnon SE. Scratch collapse test for evaluation of carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (09) 1518-1524
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Davidge KM, Gontre G, Tang D. , et al. The “hierarchical” Scratch Collapse Test for identifying multilevel ulnar nerve compression. Hand (NY) 2015; 10 (03) 388-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bayes T. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. 1763. MD Comput 1991; 08 (03) 157-171 PubMed PMID: 1857193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Preston DC, Shapiro BE. Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders. Clinical–Electrophysiologic Correlations. Third Edition. 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Rosales RS, Delgado EB, Díez de la Lastra-Bosch I. Evaluation of the Spanish version of the DASH and carpal tunnel syndrome health-related quality-of-life instruments: cross-cultural adaptation process and reliability. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (02) 334-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Levine DW, Simmons BP, Koris MJ. , et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75 (11) 1585-1592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc) 1995; 104 (20) 771-776
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Rosales RS, Dorta-Fdez A, Reboso Morales L, Afonso Rdguez J, Cerdan SM, Diez De La Lastra I. The use of health instruments in Hand Surgery. Method of adaptation and reliability of most used specific and generic instruments. In: Roth J. Richards RS. (eds). Future at Hand. IFSSH. Bologne, Italy: Monduzzi Editore S. P.A; 1988: 575-579
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Reboso Morales L, Rosales RS. . Dorta Fdez. A., Afonso Rguez, Cerdan S.M., Diez De La Lastra I. The combined use of specific instruments in the assessment of health status diagnosis in carpal tunnel syndrome. In: Roth J. Richards RS. (eds). Future at Hand. IFSSH. Bologne, Italy: Monduzzi Editore S. P.A; 1988: 571-574
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Rosales RS, Diez de la Lastra I, McCabe S, Ortega Martinez JI, Hidalgo YM. The relative responsiveness and construct validity of the Spanish version of the DASH instrument for outcomes assessment in open carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2009; 34 (01) 72-75
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Rosales RS, Dorta-Fdez A, Reboso L, Cerdan S. Responsiveness Of DASH and CTS Instruments versus Traditional Physical Exam Measures for Outcome Assessment in C.T.S. Proceedings. 9 th Kleinert Society Clinical Reunion. Louisville, USA, 1999
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28 (02) 250-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Amadio PC, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, Schleck CD, Jensen LM. Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: the relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21 (03) 338-346
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Katz JN, Gelberman RH, Wright EA, Lew RA, Liang MH. Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care 1994; 32 (11) 1127-1133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Atroshi I, Johnsson R, Sprinchorn A. Self-administered outcome instrument in carpal tunnel syndrome. Reliability, validity and responsiveness evaluated in 102 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69 (01) 82-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Rosales RS. Clinical research in hand surgery. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40 (05) 546-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Rosales RS, Reboso-Morales L, Martin-Hidalgo Y, Diez de la Lastra-Bosch I. Level of evidence in hand surgery. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 An TW, Evanoff BA, Boyer MI, Osei DA. The Prevalence of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study in a U.S. Metropolitan Cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99 (05) 408-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar