Thromb Haemost 1994; 71(05): 703-706
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1642508
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Clinical Course of Factor VIII Inhibitors Developed after Exposure to a Pasteurised Dutch Concentrate Compared to Classic Inhibitors in Hemophilia A

Authors

  • E P Mauser-Bunschoten

    1   The Van Creveld Clinic, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • F R Rosendaal

    2   Department of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands
    3   Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • H K Nieuwenhuis

    4   Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • G Roosendaal

    1   The Van Creveld Clinic, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • E Briëf

    3   Department of Hematology, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • H M van den Berg

    1   The Van Creveld Clinic, University Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 24 September 1993

Accepted after revision 21 February 1994

Publication Date:
06 July 2018 (online)

Preview

Summary

After the introduction of a new pasteurised factor VIII concentrate (Factor VIII CPS-P) in The Netherlands in June 1990, an increase in the occurrence of inhibitors in hemophilia A patients was reported. The clinical course of this group of inhibitors (n = 12) was compared with hemophilia patients in whom an inhibitor developed before June 1990 (classic inhibitors) (n = 32). Striking differences were found between both groups not only in patient age (median 22 years versus 8 years) and number of exposure days (<50 − >1000 versus <50), as described in previous reports, but also in clinical course and response to treatment. In the recent group of inhibitors antibody titers showed a rapid decline when product was changed which was not the case in the group with classic inhibitors. In the group of classic inhibitors immune tolerance therapy with low dose factor VIII succeeded in 83%. Success was to a high degree dependent on the inhibitor level. In the group of recent inhibitors immune tolerance with the same concentrate was only successful in a single patient. However, once the patients were switched to another concentrate, antibody levels dropped to less than 2 BU/ml within 8 months in all patients.

It seems likely that in this group of product associated inhibitors, treatment success was due to elimination of antigen stimulation rather than induction of immune tolerance.