Ceramic-on-Polyethylene Bearing Usage in Primary THA Is Associated with Reduced Readmission Risk for the Medicare Population

Abstract

The authors hypothesized that unplanned readmissions, which are often caused by infections and dislocation, may be reduced with ceramic bearing usage. They also sought to confirm that the readmission rates for ceramic bearings were associated with the year of surgery. They identified 245,077 elderly patients (65+) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2010 and 2015 with known bearing types (ceramic-on-polyethylene [C-PE] ceramic-on-ceramic [COC], and metal-on-polyethylene [M-PE]) from the Medicare 100% inpatient database. Outcomes included relative risk of 30- and 90-day readmission. Propensity scores were developed to adjust for selection bias in the choice of bearing type at index surgery. Cox regression incorporating propensity score stratification (10 levels) was used to evaluate the impact of bearing selection on outcomes, after adjusting for patient-, hospital-, surgeon-related factors, as well as the year of surgery. With C-PE bearings, the unadjusted (crude) 90-day readmission rate decreased from 8.7% in 2010 to 8.3% in 2015. For COC bearings, the crude 90-day readmission rate decreased from 10.5 to 9.1% from 2010 to 2015. After adjustment, year of surgery was associated with reduced readmission risk for both types of ceramic bearings in 30-day readmissions (p < 0.05) and COC in 90-day readmissions (p < 0.001). The authors also found that C-PE bearings were associated with significantly reduced readmission risk relative to M-PE at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91, p < 0.001) and 90 days (HR: 0.93, p < 0.001). In terms of strength of association with 90-day readmission, however, it was ranked the ninth most associated independent factor. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate an association between THA implant characteristics (in this case C-PE bearing usage) and reduced readmission rates in this context along with patient- and clinical-related factors. The readmission rates for COC were found to be comparable to M-PE.

Keywords

total hip arthroplasty - Medicare database - health care reform - ceramic-on-ceramic - ceramic-on-polyethylene

Note

Each author certifies that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

This work was performed at Exponent, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.

• References

• 1 Hernigou P, Homma Y, Pidet O, Guissou I, Hernigou J. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing decreases the cumulative long-term risk of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (12) 3875-3882
• 2 Hu D, Tie K, Yang X, Tan Y, Alaidaros M, Chen L. Comparison of ceramic-on-ceramic to metal-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg 2015; 10 (01) 22
• 3 Pitto RP, Sedel L. Periprosthetic joint infection in hip arthroplasty: is there an association between infection and bearing surface type?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (10) 2213-2218
• 4 Kurtz SM, Lau E, Baykal D, Springer BD. Outcomes of ceramic bearings after primary total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (03) 743-749
• 5 Shah SM, Walter WL, Tai SM, Lorimer MF, de Steiger RN. Late dislocations after total hip arthroplasty: is the bearing a factor?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (09) 2852-2856
• 6 Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Baykal D, Springer BD. Outcomes of ceramic bearings after revision total hip arthroplasty in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (09) 1979-1985
• 7 Kurtz SM, Kocagöz SB, Hanzlik JA. , et al. Do ceramic femoral heads reduce taper fretting corrosion in hip arthroplasty? A retrieval study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (10) 3270-3282
• 8 Kocagoz SB, Underwood RJ, MacDonald DW, Gilbert JL, Kurtz SM. Ceramic heads decrease metal release caused by head-taper fretting and corrosion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (04) 985-994
• 9 American Joint Replacement Registry. 2016 Annual Report. Available at http://www.ajrr.net/publications-data . Accessed April 8, 2018
• 10 Nandi S, Austin MS. Choosing a femoral head: a survey study of academic adult reconstructive surgeons. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (05) 1530-1534
• 11 Carnes KJ, Odum SM, Troyer JL, Fehring TK. Cost analysis of ceramic heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (21) 1794-1800
• 12 Wyles CC, McArthur BA, Wagner ER, Houdek MT, Jimenez-Almonte JH, Trousdale RT. Ceramic femoral heads for all patients? An argument for cost containment in hip surgery. Am J Orthop 2016; 45 (06) E362-E366
• 13 Owen DH, Russell NC, Smith PN, Walter WL. An estimation of the incidence of squeaking and revision surgery for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement: a meta-analysis and report from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B [phone]
• 14 Tai SM, Munir S, Walter WL, Pearce SJ, Walter WK, Zicat BA. Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (02) 282-285
• 15 Howard DP, Wall PDH, Fernandez MA, Parsons H, Howard PW. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing fractures in total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of data from the National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B [phone]
• 16 Lee GC, Kim RH. Incidence of modern alumina ceramic and alumina matrix composite femoral head failures in nearly 6 million hip implants. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (02) 546-551
• 17 Cafri G, Paxton EW, Love R, Bini SA, Kurtz SM. Is there a difference in revision risk between metal and ceramic heads on highly crosslinked polyethylene liners?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (05) 1349-1355
• 18 Jeffers JR, Walter WL. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip arthroplasty: state of the art and the future. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (06) 735-745
• 19 Wyles CC, Jimenez-Almonte JH, Murad MH. , et al. There are no differences in short- to mid-term survivorship among total hip-bearing surface options: a network meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473 (06) 2031-2041
• 20 Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Ong KL, Adler EM, Kolisek FR, Manley MT. Hospital, patient, and clinical factors influence 30- and 90-day readmission after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2016; 31 (10) 2130-2138
• 21 Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Ong KL, Adler EM, Kolisek FR, Manley MT. Has health care reform legislation reduced the economic burden of hospital readmissions following primary total joint arthroplasty?. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (11) 3274-3285
• 22 Bozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E. , et al. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (07) 1614-1620
• 23 Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Greenwald AS, Bozic K. Prevalence of metal-on-metal bearings in the United States. In: Kurtz SM, Greenwald AS, Mihalko WM, Lemons J. , eds. Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacement Devices, STP 1560. Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2013: 3-18
• 24 Kim YH, Park JW, Kulkarni SS, Kim YH. A randomised prospective evaluation of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in the same patients with primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (11) 2131-2137
• 25 Meftah M, Klingenstein GG, Yun RJ, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Long-term performance of ceramic and metal femoral heads on conventional polyethylene in young and active patients: a matched-pair analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95 (13) 1193-1197
• 26 Cash DJ, Khanduja V. The case for ceramic-on-polyethylene as the preferred bearing for a young adult hip replacement. Hip Int 2014; 24 (05) 421-427
• 27 Readmissions. Reduction Program (HRRP). https://wwwcmsgov/medicare/medicare-fee-for-service-payment/acuteinpatientpps/readmissions-reduction-programhtml.Accessed : September 6, 2017
• 28 Boozary AS, Manchin III J, Wicker RF. The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: Time for Reform. JAMA 2015; 314 (04) 347-348
• 29 James J. Health policy brief: Medicare hospital readmissions reduction program. Health affairs. 2013; November 12, 2013. http://www.healthaffairs.org/healthpolicybriefs/brief.php?brief_id=102 . Accessed February 21, 2018
• 30 Bozic KJ, Ward L, Vail TP, Maze M. Bundled payments in total joint arthroplasty: targeting opportunities for quality improvement and cost reduction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 188-193
• 31 Cutler DM, Ghosh K. The potential for cost savings through bundled episode payments. N Engl J Med 2012; 366 (12) 1075-1077
• 32 Iorio R. Strategies and tactics for successful implementation of bundled payments: bundled payment for care improvement at a large, urban, academic medical center. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (03) 349-350
• 33 Weinberg DS, Kraay MJ, Fitzgerald SJ, Sidagam V, Wera GD. Are readmissions after THA preventable?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (05) 1414-1423
• 34 Edwards PK, Jacobs CA, Hadden KB, Barnes CL. A perioperative patient support system was unable to mitigate the risk of hospital readmission for total hip arthroplasty patients with high American Society of Anesthesiologists grades. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (04) 1100-1102
• 35 Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Ong KL, Adler EM, Kolisek FR, Manley MT. Which clinical and patient factors influence the national economic burden of hospital readmissions after total joint arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (12) 2926-2937