Health Informatics in Developing Countries: A Review of Unintended Consequences of IT Implementations, as They Affect Patient Safety and Recommendations on How to Address Them

Summary

Background: Patient safety concerns every healthcare organization. Adoption of Health information technology (HIT) appears to have the potential to address this issue, however unanticipated and undesirable consequences from implementing HIT could lead to new and more complex hazards. This could be particularly problematic in developing countries, where regulations, policies and implementations are few, less standandarized and in some cases almost non-existing.

Methods: Based on the available information and our own experience, we conducted a review of unintended consequences of HIT implementations, as they affect patient safety in developing countries.

Results: We found that user dependency on the system, alert fatigue, less communications among healthcare actors and workarounds topics should be prioritize. Institution should consider existing knowledge, learn from other experiences and model their implementations to avoid known consequences. We also recommend that they monitor and communicate their own efforts to expand knowledge in the region.

Keywords

Unintended consequences - patient safety - health information system - information technology - developing countries

• References

• 1 World Health Organization Global Observatory for eHealth.. Building foundations for eHealth : progress of member states : report of the WHO Global Observatory for eHealth. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006
• 2 Dick RS, Steen EB, Detmer DE. Committee on Improving the Patient Record, Institute of Medicine. The computer based patient record: an essential technology for health care. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1997
• 3 Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2000
• 4 Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America.. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2001
• 5 Palmieri PA, Peterson LT, Corazzo LB. Technological iatrogenesis: the manifestation of inadequate organizational planning and the integration of health information technology. Adv Health Care Manag 2011; 10: 287-312.
• 6 Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowles JB. “e-Iatro-genesis”: the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE and other HIT. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 387-8 discussion 389.
• 7 Luna D, Almerares A, Mayan JC, González Bernaldo de Quirós F, Otero C. Health Informatics in Developing Countries: Going beyond Pilot Practices to Sustainable Implementations: A Review of the Current Challenges. Healthc Inform Res 2014; 20 (01) 3-10.
• 8 Alsadan M, El Metwally A, Anna ALI, Jamal A, Khalifa M, Househ M. Health Information Technology (HIT) in Arab Countries: A Systematic Review Study on HIT Progress. J Health Inform Dev Ctries 2015 9(2).
• 9 McDonald CJ. Computerization Can Create Safety Hazards: A Bar-Coding Near Miss. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144 (07) 510-6.
• 10 Borbolla D, Taliercio V, Schachner B, Luna D, Gonzalez Bernaldo de Quiros F. Isolation of patients with vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE): efficacy of an electronic alert system. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 180: 698-702.
• 11 Bayoumi I, Al Balas M, Handler SM, Dolovich L, Hutchison B, Holbrook A. The effectiveness of computerized drug-lab alerts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Inform 2014; 83 (06) 406-15.
• 12 Agency for healthcare research and quality.. Alert Fatigue. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/28/alert-fatigue (accessed January 4 2016).
• 13 Lee EK, Mejia AF, Senior T, Jose J. Improving Patient Safety through Medical Alert Management: An Automated Decision Tool to Reduce Alert Fatigue. AMIA Ann Symp Proc 2010; 2010: 417-21.
• 14 Thaver IH, Harpham T, McPake B, Garner T. Private Practitioners in the Slums of Karachi: What Quality of Care Do They Offer?. Soc Sci Med 1998; 46 (11) 1441-49.
• 15 Shah NR, Seger AC, Seger DL, Fiskio JM, Kuperman GJ, Blumenfeld B. Improving acceptance of computerized prescribing alerts in ambulatory care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; Jan-Feb 13 (01) 5-11.
• 16 Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (02) 104-12.
• 17 Campbell E, Sittig D, Ash J, Guappone K, Dykstra R. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (05) 547-56.
• 18 Walker J, Meltsner M, Delbanco T. US experience with doctors and patients sharing clinical notes. BMJ 2015; Feb 10 350: g7785. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25670182.
• 19 Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some Unintended Consequences of Information Technology in Health Care: The Nature of Patient Care Information System-related Errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (02) 104-12.
• 20 Westbrook JI, Rob MI, Woods A, Parry D. Errors in the administration of intravenous medications in hospital and the role of correct procedures and nurse experience. BMJ Qual Saf 2011; 20 (12) 1027-34.
• 21 Meeks DW, Smith MW, Taylor L, Sittig DF, Scott JM, Singh H. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2014; 21 (06) 1053-9.