Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2018; 31(04): 298-303
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1639599
Case Report
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Temporary Segmental Distraction in a Dog with Degenerative Lumbosacral Stenosis

Nicole Willems
1   Division of Orthopaedics/Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Roel F.M.R. Kersten
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Diakonessenhuis, Diakonessenhuis, Zeist, The Netherlands
,
Steven M. van Gaalen
2   Department of Orthopaedics, Diakonessenhuis, Diakonessenhuis, Zeist, The Netherlands
,
F. Cumhur Öner
3   Department of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Gustav J. Strijkers
4   Department of Biomedical Engineering & Physics, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
Stefanie Veraa
5   Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Martijn Beukers
5   Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Marianna A. Tryfonidou
1   Division of Orthopaedics/Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Björn P. Meij
1   Division of Orthopaedics/Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations Funding The financial contribution of the Dutch Arthritis Foundation (LLP22) and donation of the pedicle screws and rods by DePuy Synthes are gratefully acknowledged.
Further Information

Publication History

28 March 2017

13 February 2018

Publication Date:
02 June 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) is characterized by intervertebral disc degeneration and causes lower back pain in dogs. Temporary distraction in rabbit models with induced intervertebral disc degeneration showed signs of intervertebral disc repair. In the present study, we assessed safety and efficacy of temporary segmental distraction in a dog with clinical signs of DLSS.

Methods Distraction of the lumbosacral junction by pedicle screw–rod fixation was applied in a 5-year-old Greyhound with DLSS and evaluated by radiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and force plate analysis before and after distraction.

Results Safe distraction of the lumbosacral junction was demonstrated, with improvement of clinical signs after removal of the distraction device. Signal intensity of the intervertebral disc showed no changes over time. T2 value was highest directly after removal of the distraction device but decreased by 10% of the preoperative value at 9 months of follow-up. Disc height decreased (8%) immediately after removal of the distraction device, but recovered to the initial value. A decrease in the pelvic/thoracic propulsive force during pedicle screw–rod fixation and distraction was demonstrated, which slowly increased by 4% compared with the initial value.

Clinical significance Temporary pedicle screw–rod fixation in combination with distraction in a dog with DLSS was safe, improved clinical signs and retained disc height at 9 months of follow-up.

Keywords

degenerative lumbosacral stenosis - dog - intervertebral disc - lower back pain - distraction

Author Contributions

SMvG, FCÖ, MAT and BPM participated in the study conception. All authors were involved in the study design and acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and in the drafting and revision of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.


 

  • References

  • 1 Meij BP, Bergknut N. Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2010; 40 (05) 983-1009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tellegen AR, Willems N, Tryfonidou MA, Meij BP. Pedicle screw-rod fixation: a feasible treatment for dogs with severe degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11 (01) 299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Spengler DM. Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine 1982; 7 (06) 604-607
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wiegant K, Intema F, van Roermund PM. , et al. Evidence of cartilage repair by joint distraction in a canine model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015; 67 (02) 465-474
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Waller C, Hayes D, Block JE, London NJ. Unload it: the key to the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (11) 1823-1829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Marijnissen AC, Van Roermund PM, Van Melkebeek J. , et al. Clinical benefit of joint distraction in the treatment of severe osteoarthritis of the ankle: proof of concept in an open prospective study and in a randomized controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46 (11) 2893-2902
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Buric J, Pulidori M. Long-term reduction in pain and disability after surgery with the interspinous device for intervertebral assisted motion (DIAM) spinal stabilization system in patients with low back pain: 4-year follow-up from a longitudinal prospective case series. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (08) 1304-1311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Boden SD, Andersson GB, Fraser RD. , et al. Selection of the optimal procedure to achieve lumbar spinal fusion. Introduction. 1995 Focus Issue Meeting on Fusion. Spine 1995; 20 (24, Suppl): 166S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG. , et al. Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2007; 32 (20) 2253-2257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Guehring T, Omlor GW, Lorenz H. , et al. Disc distraction shows evidence of regenerative potential in degenerated intervertebral discs as evaluated by protein expression, magnetic resonance imaging, and messenger ribonucleic acid expression analysis. Spine 2006; 31 (15) 1658-1665
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Willems N, Bach FC, Plomp SG. , et al. Intradiscal application of rhBMP-7 does not induce regeneration in a canine model of spontaneous intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther 2015; 17: 137
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Smolders LA, Voorhout G, van de Ven R. , et al. Pedicle screw-rod fixation of the canine lumbosacral junction. Vet Surg 2012; 41 (06) 720-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Masuda K, Imai Y, Okuma M. , et al. Osteogenic protein-1 injection into a degenerated disc induces the restoration of disc height and structural changes in the rabbit anular puncture model. Spine 2006; 31 (07) 742-754
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bergknut N, Auriemma E, Wijsman S. , et al. Evaluation of intervertebral disk degeneration in chondrodystrophic and nonchondrodystrophic dogs by use of Pfirrmann grading of images obtained with low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72 (07) 893-898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Suwankong N, Meij BP, Van Klaveren NJ. , et al. Assessment of decompressive surgery in dogs with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis using force plate analysis and questionnaires. Vet Surg 2007; 36 (05) 423-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Suwankong N, Meij BP, Voorhout G, de Boer AH, Hazewinkel HA. Review and retrospective analysis of degenerative lumbosacral stenosis in 156 dogs treated by dorsal laminectomy. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21 (03) 285-293
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Marinelli NL, Haughton VM, Anderson PA. T2 relaxation times correlated with stage of lumbar intervertebral disk degeneration and patient age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (07) 1278-1282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tellegen AR, Willems N, Beukers M. , et al. Intradiscal application of a PCLA-PEG-PCLA hydrogel loaded with celecoxib for the treatment of back pain in canines: what's in it for humans?. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2017; 11 (10) 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mastbergen SC, Miranda A, Coeleveld K. , et al. Intrinsic cartilage repair by joint distraction is triggered by a regenerative transcriptional response. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74 (Suppl. 02) 124
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chan SC, Ferguson SJ, Gantenbein-Ritter B. The effects of dynamic loading on the intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J 2011; 20 (11) 1796-1812
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Guehring T, Unglaub F, Lorenz H, Omlor G, Wilke HJ, Kroeber MW. Intradiscal pressure measurements in normal discs, compressed discs and compressed discs treated with axial posterior disc distraction: an experimental study on the rabbit lumbar spine model. Eur Spine J 2006; 15 (05) 597-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tellegen AR, Willems N, Tryfonidou MA, Meij BP. Pedicle screw-rod fixation: a feasible treatment for dogs with severe degenerative lumbosacral stenosis. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11 (11) 299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar