Section 1: Health and Clinical Mangement: Health and Clinical Management – Comparing the Clinical Outcome of Computerized Strategies

J. Bergmann; Managing Editor for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Health and Clinical Management

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1638473

Yearbook of Medical Informatics, Table of Contents

Yearb Med Inform 2006; 15(01): 26-28
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1638473

Synopsis

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Section 1: Health and Clinical Mangement: Health and Clinical Management – Comparing the Clinical Outcome of Computerized Strategies

Findings from the Section on Health and Clinical Management

J. Bergmann

¹Technical University of Braunschweig, Institute of Medical Informatics, Braunschweig, Germany

,

Managing Editor for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Health and Clinical Management

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Objectives

To summarize current excellent research in the field of health and clinical management.

Methods

Synopsis of the articles selected for the IMIA Yearbook 2006.

Results

Current research in the field of health and clinical management analyses impact and patient outcome of both established and recently presented approaches. Usability and effects of extracting data from computerized medical records for preventive care and surveillance issues are a topic as well as strategies for detecting adverse events.

Conclusions

The best paper selection in the field of health and clinical management shows examples of excellent research on assessment, strategies and concepts for computerized health information management approaches. The articles emphasize the necessity of carefully considering health information systems regarding their outcome and compatibility with clinical routine. A concerted management of knowledge about evaluated health information management approaches will advance this trend and should lead to a more evidence-based design of the underlying systems.

Keywords

Medical Informatics - International Medical Informatics Association - Yearbook - Patient Care Management - Technology Assessment - Biomedical

Full Text

References

References
1 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From hospital information systems to health information systems. Problems, challenges, perspectives. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (04) 275-87.
2 Bott OJ, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Knaup P, Lang E, Pilgram R. et al. The challenge of ubiquitous computing in health care: technology, concepts and solutions. Findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (03) 473-9.
3 Pluye P, Grad RM. How information retrieval technology may impact on physician practice: an organizational case study in family medicine. J Eval Clin Pract 2004; 10 (03) 413-30.
4 Balas EA, Krishna S, Kretschmer RA, Cheek TR, Lobach DF, Boren SA. Computerized knowledge management in diabetes care. Med Care 2004; 42 (06) 610-21.
5 Rolnick SJ, Hart G, Barton MB, Herrinton L, Flores SK, Paulsen KJ. et al. Comparing breast cancer case identification using HMO computerized diagnostic data and SEER data. Am J Manag Care 2004; 10 (04) 257-62.
6 Mullooly J, Drew L, DeStefano F, Maher J, Bohlke K, Immanuel V. et al. Quality assessments of HMO diagnosis databases used to monitor childhood vac- cine safety. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (02) 163-70.
7 Appelrath HJ, Friebe J, Grawunder M, Wellmann I. The need for open geographical information systems in medicine. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (02) 69-73.
8 Dexter PR, Perkins SM, Maharry KS, Jones K, McDonald CJ. Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 292 (19) 2366-71.
9 Field TS, Gurwitz JH, Harrold LR, Rothschild JM, Debellis K, Seger AC. et al. Strategies for detecting adverse drug events among older persons in the ambulatory setting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (06) 492-8.
10 Hsieh TC, Kuperman GJ, Jaggi T, Hojnowski-Diaz P, Fiskio J, Williams DH. et al. Characteristics and consequences of drug allergy alert overrides in a computerized physician order entry system. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (06) 482-91.
11 Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (01) 44-56.
12 Gaus W, Westendorf J, Diebow R, Kieser M. Identification of adverse drug reactions by evaluation of a prescription database, demonstrated for “risk of bleeding”. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (05) 697-703.
13 Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (25) 2526-34.
14 Ash JS, Stavri PZ, Kuperman GJ. A Consensus Statement on Considerations for a Successful CPOE Implementation. J Am Med Inf Assoc 2003; 10 (03) 229-34.
15 Toth-Pal E, Nilsson GH, Furhoff AK. Clinical effect of computer generated physician reminders in health screening in primary health care—a controlled clinical trial of preventive services among the elderly. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 9-10 695-703.