Section 2: Computer-based Patient Records

• References

• 1 de Keizer NF, Abu-Hanna A. Understanding terminological systems II: Experience with conceptual and formal representation of structure. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39 (01) 22-9. http://methods.schattauer.de/
• 2 Gu H, Perl Y, Geller J, Halper M, Liu L-M, Cimino JJ. Representing the UMLS as an object-oriented database: modeling issues and advantages. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000; Jan-Feb 7 (01) 66-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC61456/pdf/0070066.pdf
• 3 Rector AL. Clinical terminology: Why is it so hard?. Methods Inf Med 1999; 38 4-5 239-52. http://methods.schattauer.de/
• 4 Tang PC, LaRosa MP, Gorden SM. Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; May-Jun 6 (03) 245-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC61364/pdf/0060245.pdf
• 5 Vlug AE, van der Lei J, Mosseveld BM, van Wijk MA, van der Linden PD, Sturkenboom MC, van Bemmel JH. Postmarketing surveillance based on electronic patient records: the IPCI project. Methods Inf Med 1999; Dec 38 4-5 339-44. http://methods.schattauer.de/
• 6 Weatherburn GC, Bryan S. The effect of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on patient radiation doses for examination of the lateral lumbar spine. Br J Radiol 1999; Jun 72 (858) 534-45. http://www.birpublications.org/doi/pdf/10.1259/bjr.72.858.10560334
• 7 Yamazaki S, Satomura Y. Standard method for describing an electronic patient record template: application of XML to share domain knowledge. Methods Inf Med 2000; Mar 39 (01) 50-5. http://methods.schattauer.de