Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17(02): 57-63
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1636478
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Periosteal surgery

A review of clinical and experimental findings
S. M. Rackard
1   Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
,
C. R. Bellenger
1   Veterinary Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 30 July 2003

Accepted 19 December 2003

Publication Date:
08 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Periosteal section influences bone development in many species. Long bone growth has been stimulated and limb deviations have been created and corrected by surgically manipulating the periosteum. This paper reviews clinical and experimental findings following different types of periosteal surgery on the immature long bone and considers what mechanisms may be involved in these effects.

 
  • References

  • 1 Anghi M, Wilson JW. Effects of periosteal stripping on bone growth. American College of Veterinary Surgeons: Scientific Meeting Abstracts. 1990: 56.
  • 2 Auer JA, Martens RJ. Angular limb deformities in young foals. Proc Annu Meet Am Assoc Equine Pract 1980; 26: 81-96.
  • 3 Auer JA, Martens RJ. Periosteal transection and periosteal stripping for correction of angular limb deformities in foals. Am J Vet Res 1982; 43: 1530-4.
  • 4 Auer JA, Martens RJ, Morris EL. Angular limb deformities in foals. Part I: Congenital Factors. Compend Cont Educ 1982; 04: 330.
  • 5 Auer JA. Periosteal transection of the proximal phalanx in foals with angular limb deformities of the metacarpo/metatarsophalangeal area. J AmVet Med Ass 1985; 187: 496-9.
  • 6 Auer JA. Appendicular deviations. In: Current practice of equine surgery. White NA, Moore JN. eds. JB Lippincott Company; Philadelphia: 1990: 482-500.
  • 7 Auer JA. Angular limb deformities. In: Equine surgery. Auer JA. ed. WB Saunders; Philadelphia: 1992: 940-56.
  • 8 Banks WJ. Applied veterinary histology. 3rd ed. Mosby Year Book, St.Louis; USA: 1993
  • 9 Barr ARS. Management of angular limb deformities in the foal. Equine Veterinary Education 1995; 07: 75-8.
  • 10 Bertone AL, Turner AS, Park RD. Periosteal transection and stripping for treatment of angular limb deformities in foals: Clinical observations. J Am Vet Med Ass 1985; a 187: 145-52.
  • 11 Bertone AL, Park RD, Turner AS. Periosteal transection and stripping for treatment of angular limb deformities in foals: radiographic observations. J Am Vet Med Ass 1985; b 187: 153-6.
  • 12 Bertram JEA. The fibrous periosteum in bone growth: Physical properties and functional possibilities. Am Zool 1991; 31: 37A.
  • 13 Bertram JEA, Hall BK, DeMont ME. Does the diaphyseal periosteum restrict longitudinal growth in long bones?. In: Fundamentals of bone growth: Methodology and applications. Dixon AD, Sarnat BG, Hoyte DAN. eds. CRC Press; Boca Raton, Florida: 1991: 363-74.
  • 14 Bertram JEA, Polevoy Y, Cullinane DM. Mechanics of avian periosteum: Tensile and adhesion properties during growth. Bone 1998; 22: 669-75.
  • 15 Bloom W, Fawcett DW. A textbook of histology. 9th ed. W.B Saunders; Philadelphia, USA: 1968
  • 16 Bramlage LR, Embertson RM. Observations on the evaluation and selection of foal limb deformities for surgical treatment. Proc Am Ass Equine Practnrs 1990; 36: 273-9.
  • 17 Chatterjee S, Prasad GC, Udupa KN. Changes in endocrine glands during fracture repair and effect of their ablation. J Trauma 1970; 10: 890-9.
  • 18 Church LE, Johnson LC. Growth of long bones in the chicken. Rates of growth in length and diameter of the humerus, tibia and metatarsus. Am J Anat 1964; 114: 521.
  • 19 Crilly RG. Longitudinal overgrowth of the chicken radius. J Anat 1972; 112: 11-8.
  • 20 Dellman HD, Carithers JR. Cytology and microscopic anatomy: The National Veterinary Medical Series for Independent Study. Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia, USA: 1996
  • 21 Dimitriou CG, Kapetanos GA, Symeonides PP. The effect of partial periosteal division on growth of long bones. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Orthop 1988; 236: 265-9.
  • 22 Edinger H, Kofler J, Ebner J. Angular limb deformity in a calf treated by periosteotomy and wedge osteotomy. Vet Rec 1995; 137: 245-6.
  • 23 Edwards DJ, Bickerstaff DB, Bell MJ. Periosteal stripping in achondroplastic children. Acta Orthop Scand 1994; 65: 333-4.
  • 24 Garces GL, Hernandez JAHermoso. Bone growth after periosteal stripping in rats. Int Orthop 1991; 15: 49-52.
  • 25 Hernandez JA, Serrano S, Marinoso ML, Aubia LJ, Marrugat J, Diez A. Bone growth and modeling changes induced by periosteal stripping in the rat. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1995; 320: 211-9.
  • 26 Houghton FR, Rooker GD. The role of periosteum in the growth of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1979; 61: 218-20.
  • 27 Houghton GR, Dekel S. The periosteal control of long bone growth: an experimental study in the rat. Acta Orthop Scand 1979; 50: 635-7.
  • 28 Jenkins DHR, Cheng CHF, Hodgson AR. Stimulation of bone growth by periosteal stripping. J Bone Joint Surg 1975; 57: 482-4.
  • 29 Joyce ME, Roberts AB, Sporn MB, Bolander ME. Transforming growth factorβ and the initiation of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in the rat femur. J Cell Biol 1990; 110: 2195-207.
  • 30 Kember NF. Cell kinetics in cartilage. In: Cartilage; Volume I: Structure, function and biochemistry. Hall BK. ed. Academic Press; New York: 1983: 14980.
  • 31 Kery L. Effect of periosteal stripping and incision of the cortical bone on the longitudinal growth of long bones. An experimental study. Acad Chir Sci Hung 1972; 13: 133-40.
  • 32 Kery L, Lenar G, Szasz I. Effect of diaphyseal injury on the proximal growth zone of the tibia in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 1980; 51: 482-4.
  • 33 Khoury CSola, Silberman FS, Cabrini RL. Stimulation of the longitudinal growth of long bones by periosteal stripping. J Bone Joint Surg 1963; 45: 1679-84.
  • 34 Kristic RV. Illustrated encyclopaedia of human histology. Springer-Verlag; Heidelberg, Germany: 1984
  • 35 Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Maltha JC, Bex JHM, Daggers JG. The influence of vascular and periosteal interferences on the histological structure of growth plates of long bones. Anat Anz Jena 1987; 164: 245-54.
  • 36 Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Bex JHM, Maltha JC, Daggers JG. Longitudinal growth of the rabbit femur after vascular and periosteal interference. Anat Anz Jena 1988; 167: 349-58.
  • 37 LaCroix P. The organisation of bones. Translated by Gilder S. Blaikston Co; Philadelphia, USA: 1951
  • 38 Lynch M, Taylor J. Periosteal division and longitudinal growth in the tibia of the rat. J Bone Joint Surg 1987; 69: 812-6.
  • 39 McLain J, Hamilton D, Vig P. Periosteal tension and long bone growth in rats. J Dent Res 1980; 60 [Spec issue]: 579.
  • 40 Mcllwraith CW, Turner AS. Equine surgery. advanced techniques. Lea and Febiger; Philadelphia: 1987: 128-32.
  • 41 Mitten LA, Bertone AL. Angular limb deformities in foals. J Am Vet Med Ass 1984; 204: 717-20.
  • 42 Moss ML. The regulation of skeletal growth. In: Regulation of organ and tissue growth. Gross R. ed. Academic Press; New York: 1972: 127-42.
  • 43 Moss-Salentijn L. Long bone growth. In: Bone growth. Hall BK. ed. A. Cladwell; Telford, UK: 1992: 185-208.
  • 44 Rackard SM, Carr AJ, Callanan JJ, Bellenger CR. An avian model of limb deviation induced by periosteal surgery. Res Vet Sci 2002; 73: 237-41.
  • 45 Rhodin J. Histology: A text and atlas. Oxford University Press; Oxford: 1976
  • 46 Rooker G. The effect of division of the periosteum on the rate of longitudinal bone growth. An experimental study in the rabbit. Orthop Trans 1980; 04: 400-1.
  • 47 Ross H, Johnson IDA, Welborn TA, Wright AD. Effect of abdominal operation on glucose tolerance and serum levels of insulin, growth hormone and hydrocortisone. Lancet 1966; ii: 563-8.
  • 48 Ross MH. Histology – A text and atlas. 3rd ed. Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia: 1995
  • 49 Sebek J, Skalova J, Hert J. Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli. Part 8. Local differences in structure and strength of periosteum. Folia Morphol 1972; 20: 29-37.
  • 50 Shiu MH, Wong WT. Periosteal stripping in the stimulation of longitudinal bone growth in rabbits. J Western Pacific Orthopaedic Association 1964; 04: 241-6.
  • 51 Silbermann FS, Sola CK, Cabrini RL. A study of the vascular disruption after periosteal stripping of long bones. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1967; 125: 1311-5.
  • 52 Sunden G. Some aspects of longitudinal bone growth: An experimental study of the rabbit tibia. Acta Orthop Scand 1967; suppl. 103: 13.
  • 53 Taylor J, Warrell E, Evans R. The response of the rat tibial growth plates to distal periosteal division. J Anat 1987; 151: 221-31.
  • 54 Taylor JF. The periosteum and bone growth. In: Bone. Bone growth-intrinsic and metabolic control, vol 6. Hall BK. ed. CRC Press; Boca Raton, Florida: 1990: 21-52.
  • 55 Warrell E, Taylor JF. The role of periosteal tension in the growth of long bones. J Anat 1979; 128: 179-84.
  • 56 Wilde GP, Baker GCW. Circumferential periosteal release in the treatment of children with leg-length inequality. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1987; 69: 817-21.
  • 57 Wray JB, Goodman HO. Post fracture vascular phenomenon and long bone overgrowth in the immature skeleton of the rat. J. Bone Joint Surg 1961; 43: 1047-55.
  • 58 Yabsley R, Harris W. The effect of shaft fractures and periosteal stripping on the vascular supply to epiphyseal plates. J Bone Joint Surg 1965; 47: 551-6.