Thromb Haemost 2018; 118(S 01): S45-S60
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635084
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart

Understanding the Value of Real-World Evidence: Focus on Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation with Rivaroxaban

A. John Camm
1   Division of Clinical Sciences, St George's University of London and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
,
Craig I. Coleman
2   University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Connecticut, United States
,
Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
3   Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
,
Peter Brønnum Nielsen
3   Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
,
CAPT Sally Tamayo
4   Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding Editorial support was funded by Bayer AG.
Further Information

Publication History

29 September 2017

05 January 2018

Publication Date:
22 March 2018 (online)

Abstract

Real-world data are a well-recognized component within the drug lifecycle, and such data are generated from a range of sources and study designs, including claims databases, electronic health records, non-interventional studies (NIS) and registries. While this information can be of vital clinical importance, there may be challenges in understanding the relevance of the differing study designs, endpoints and populations. Here, we summarize the value of real-world evidence and considerations pertinent to their use in clinical research. Owing to the variety of analyses being conducted using real-world data, it is important for researchers and clinicians to have a clear understanding of the nature and origin of those data, and to ensure they are valid, reliable and robust in terms of extrapolating meaningful findings. There are crucial questions to address when evaluating real-world studies, and we introduce a checklist to meet these objectives. In addition to advice for appraising data quality and study designs, several updates will be covered from real-world studies of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF): the nationwide Danish cohort study, U.S. Department of Defense Military Health System database, retrospective claim database study REAFFIRM and a pooled analysis from the global NIS XArelto on preveNtion of sTroke and non-central nervoUS system systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (XANTUS). Real-world studies consistently show that rivaroxaban is an effective treatment option with acceptable safety when used for stroke prevention in a large number of patients with AF across the globe.

Copyright Notice

CAPT Sally Tamayo is a military service member. This work was prepared as part of her official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that ‘Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government’. Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a United States Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the United States Government as part of that person's official duties.


Disclaimer

U.S. DoD MHS research data derived from an approved Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, VA IRB protocol (NMCP.2013.0021). The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense or the United States Government.


 
  • References

  • 1 Cohen AT, Goto S, Schreiber K. , et al. Why do we need observational studies of everyday patients in the real-life setting?. Eur Heart J Suppl 2015; 17 (Suppl D): D2-D8
  • 2 Frieden TR. Evidence for health decision making - beyond randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2017; 377 (05) 465-475
  • 3 Annemans L, Aristides M, Kubin M. Real-life data: a growing need. ISPOR. Available at: https://www.ispor.org/news/articles/oct07/rld.asp . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 4 Camm AJ, Amarenco P, Haas S. , et al; XANTUS Investigators. XANTUS: a real-world, prospective, observational study of patients treated with rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2016; 37 (14) 1145-1153
  • 5 Dreyer NA, Bryant A, Velentgas P. The GRACE Checklist: a validated assessment tool for high quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2016; 22 (10) 1107-1113
  • 6 Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A. , et al; RECORD Working Committee. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 2015; 12 (10) e1001885
  • 7 Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006; 2006: 359-363
  • 8 European Union. DIRECTIVE 2001/20/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2001_20/dir_2001_20_en.pdf . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 9 Theobald K, Capan M, Herbold M, Schinzel S, Hundt F. Quality assurance in non-interventional studies. Ger Med Sci 2009; 7: Doc29
  • 10 Turpie AG, Haas S, Kreutz R. , et al. A non-interventional comparison of rivaroxaban with standard of care for thromboprophylaxis after major orthopaedic surgery in 17,701 patients with propensity score adjustment. Thromb Haemost 2014; 111 (01) 94-102
  • 11 Ageno W, Mantovani LG, Haas S. , et al. Safety and effectiveness of oral rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for the treatment of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis (XALIA): an international, prospective, non-interventional study. Lancet Haematol 2016; 3 (01) e12-e21
  • 12 Camm AJ, Amarenco P, Haas S. , et al. Real-world versus randomized trial outcomes in similar populations of rivaroxaban-treated patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in ROCKET AF and XANTUS. Presented at the American College of Cardiology (ACC) 66th Annual Scientific Session and Expo, Washington, DC, March 17–19, 2017, Poster 084
  • 13 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J. , et al; ROCKET AF Investigators. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (10) 883-891
  • 14 ClinicalTrials.gov. Xarelto for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation in Latin America and EMEA Region (XANTUS-EL). NCT01800006. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01800006 . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 15 ClinicalTrials.gov. Xarelto for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation in Asia (XANAP). NCT01750788. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01750788 . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 16 Kirchhof P, Radaideh G, Kim YH. , et al. Safety analysis of rivaroxaban: a pooled analysis of the global XANTUS programme. (real world, prospective, observational studies for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation). Eur Heart J 2017; 38 (Suppl): 768-769
  • 17 Riley GF. Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data. Med Care 2009; 47 (07) (Suppl. 01) S51-S55
  • 18 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicare. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare.html . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 19 Tamayo S, Frank Peacock W, Patel M. , et al. Characterizing major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a pharmacovigilance study of 27 467 patients taking rivaroxaban. Clin Cardiol 2015; 38 (02) 63-68
  • 20 Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39 (7, Suppl): 30-33
  • 21 Kildemoes HW, Sørensen HT, Hallas J. The Danish National Prescription Registry. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39 (7, Suppl): 38-41
  • 22 Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39 (7, Suppl): 22-25
  • 23 Hansen L. The MarketScan® Databases for Life Sciences Researchers. White Paper, May 2016. Available at: http://content.truvenhealth.com/rs/699-YLV-293/images/%7B87d8921a-c27c-4382-bd88-d8ec9011de70%7D_2016_Truven_Health_MarketScan_white_paper_for_Life_Sciences.pdf?aliId=1274509 . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 24 Wallace P. Optum Labs - Partners. Data and Design. Available at: http://www.himssasiapac.org/sites/default/files/HIMSSAP_AP15Slides_UnitingDataAndPartnershipToConfrontAndSolveHealthcare-sBigChallenges.pdf . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 25 Humedica. Real Health Data. Healthcare Database Information. Available at: https://hinora.uncc.edu/sites/hinora.uncc.edu/files/media/Database%20Narrative_19mar2013.pdf . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 26 Gandhi S, Salmon JW, Kong SX. , et al. Administrative databases and outcomes assessment: an overview of issues and potential utility. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 1999; 5 (03) 215-222
  • 27 ProfNet Medical. Questions and answers on ICD10 coding. Available at: http://www.profnetmedical.co.za/media/1080/qa-on-icd-10-v2.pdf . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 28 Coleman CI, Antz M, Bowrin K. , et al. Real-world evidence of stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States: the REVISIT-US study. Curr Med Res Opin 2016; 32 (12) 2047-2053
  • 29 MHP Communications. The tricky second album: From RCTs to RWE, does industry have the right mix for clinicians' tastes?. Available at https://issuu.com/mhpcommunications/docs/mhp_health_tricky_second_album . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 30 Research Data Assistance Center. Strengths and limitations of CMS administrative data in research. Available at: https://www.resdac.org/resconnect/articles/156 . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 31 Mini-Sentinel. Mini-sentinel medical product assessment a protocol for assessment of dabigatran. Version 3, March 27, 2015. Available at: https://www.sentinelsystem.org/sites/default/files/Drugs/Assessments/Mini-Sentinel_Protocol-for-Assessment-of-Dabigatran_0.pdf . Accessed February 8, 2018
  • 32 Cunningham A, Stein CM, Chung CP, Daugherty JR, Smalley WE, Ray WA. An automated database case definition for serious bleeding related to oral anticoagulant use. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2011; 20 (06) 560-566
  • 33 Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 2011; 46 (03) 399-424
  • 34 Larsen TB, Skjøth F, Nielsen PB, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GY. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2016; 353: i3189
  • 35 Yao X, Shah ND, Sangaralingham LR, Gersh BJ, Noseworthy PA. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69 (23) 2779-2790
  • 36 Nielsen PB, Skjøth F, Søgaard M, Kjældgaard JN, Lip GY, Larsen TB. Effectiveness and safety of reduced dose non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: propensity weighted nationwide cohort study. BMJ 2017; 356: j510
  • 37 Coleman CI, Peacock WF, Bunz TJ, Alberts MJ. Effectiveness and safety of apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and previous stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke 2017; 48 (08) 2142-2149
  • 38 Peacock WF, Tamayo S, Patel M, Sicignano N, Hopf KP, Yuan Z. CHA2DS2-VASc scores and major bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are receiving rivaroxaban. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 69 (05) 541-550.e1
  • 39 Peacock WF, Tamayo S, Sicignano N, Hopf KP, Yuan Z, Patel M. Comparison of the incidence of major bleeding with rivaroxaban use among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients with versus without diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2017; 119 (05) 753-759
  • 40 Holster IL, Valkhoff VE, Kuipers EJ, Tjwa ET. New oral anticoagulants increase risk for gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2013; 145 (01) 105-112.e15
  • 41 Miller CS, Grandi SM, Shimony A, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2012; 110 (03) 453-460
  • 42 Abraham NS, Singh S, Alexander GC. , et al. Comparative risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin: population based cohort study. BMJ 2015; 350: h1857
  • 43 McCarthy DM. Prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal symptoms and complications due to NSAIDs. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 15 (05) 755-773
  • 44 Cangemi DJ, Krill T, Weideman R, Cipher DJ, Spechler SJ, Feagins LA. A comparison of the rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants or warfarin. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112 (05) 734-739
  • 45 Deitelzweig S, Luo X, Gupta K. , et al. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of treatment with apixaban vs. other oral anticoagulants among elderly nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2017; 33 (10) 1745-1754
  • 46 Deitelzweig S, Bruno A, Trocio J. , et al. An early evaluation of bleeding-related hospital readmissions among hospitalized patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Curr Med Res Opin 2016; 32 (03) 573-582
  • 47 Lip GY, Keshishian A, Kamble S. , et al. Real-world comparison of major bleeding risk among non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients initiated on apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or warfarin. A propensity score matched analysis. Thromb Haemost 2016; 116 (05) 975-986
  • 48 Yao X, Abraham NS, Sangaralingham LR. , et al. Effectiveness and safety of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5 (06) e003725
  • 49 Conn VS, Ruppar TM, Phillips LJ, Chase JA. Using meta-analyses for comparative effectiveness research. Nurs Outlook 2012; 60 (04) 182-190
  • 50 Camm AJ, Fox KAA, Peterson E. Challenges in comparing the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation-related stroke prevention. Europace 2018; 20 (01) 1-11
  • 51 Almutairi AR, Zhou L, Gellad WF. , et al. Effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Clin Ther 2017; 39 (07) 1456-1478.e36
  • 52 Ntaios G, Papavasileiou V, Makaritsis K, Vemmos K, Michel P, Lip GYH. Real-world setting comparison of nonvitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants versus vitamin-K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2017; 48 (09) 2494-2503
  • 53 Miller CS, Dorreen A, Martel M, Huynh T, Barkun AN. Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15 (11) 1674-1683.e3
  • 54 Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M. , et al. Stroke, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare beneficiaries treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176 (11) 1662-1671
  • 55 Graham DJ, Reichman ME, Wernecke M. , et al. Cardiovascular, bleeding, and mortality risks in elderly Medicare patients treated with dabigatran or warfarin for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015; 131 (02) 157-164
  • 56 DGI, LLC (2017). B.R.I.D.G.E. TO DATA® (Online database). Available at: www.bridgetodata.org . Accessed February 8, 2018