Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 1996; 35(02): 98-100
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634651
Editorial Commentary
Schattauer GmbH

The Physician's Flexible Narrative

A. M. van Ginneken
1   Dept. of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
14 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kay S, Purves IN. Medical records and other stories: a narratological framework. Meth Inform Med 1996; 35: 72-87.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Quaak MI, Westerman RF, van Bemmel JH. Comparisons between written and computerised patient histories. BMJ 1987; 295: 184-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 McDonald CJ. Action-oriented decisions in ambulatory medicine. Chicago: Yearbook Medical Publishers; 1981
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Rector AL, Nowlan WA, Kay S. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 179-86.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Van Ginneken AM. Editorial. Documenting an event and its evolving meaning. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 279-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rector AL, Nowlan WA, Kay S, Goble CA, Howkins TJ. A framework for modelling the electronic medical record. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 109-19.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dick RS, Steen EB. The Computer-based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Committee on Improving the Patient Record, Division of Health Care Services. Institute of Medicine Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1991
    Google Scholar
  • 8 McDonald CJ, Tierney WM. Computer-stored medical records: Their future role in medical practice. JAMA 1988; 259: 3433-40.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shortliffe EH, Tang PC. Patient records and computers. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115: 979-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Van der Lei J. Editorial: Use and abuse of computer-stored medical records. Meth Inform Med 1991; 30: 79-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Reiser J. The clinical record in medicine. Part 2: Reforming content and purpose. Ann Intern Med 1991; 114: 980-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Van Ginneken AM, van der Lei J. Understanding differential diagnostic disagreement in pathology. In: Clayton PD. ed Proceedings of the 15th SCAMC. New York: McGraw Hill; 1992: 99-103.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Whiting-O’Keefe QE, Simborg DE, Epstein WV, Warger A. A computerised summary medical record can provide more information than the standard medical record. JAMA 1985; 254: 1185-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Buekens F, Ceusters W, De Moor G. The explanatory role of events in causal and temporal reasoning in medicine. Meth Inform Med 1993; 32: 274-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar