J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79(S 01): S1-S188
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633701
Poster Presentations
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Brain Stem Cavernous Malformations: Operative Nuances of a Less Invasive Resection Technique

Harminder Singh
1   Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
,
Turki Elarjani
2   University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Harley Brito da Silva
2   University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Rakshith Shetty
2   University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Louis Kim
2   University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Laligam N. Sekhar
2   University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 February 2018 (online)

 

Background Different operative techniques are reported for the resection of brain stem cavernous malformations (BSCMs). The senior author has previously reported on a less invasive technique of entering the brain stem with piecemeal removal of BSCMs, especially the deep-seated ones.

Objective We aim to present a larger series of these lesions, emphasizing the approach to the brain stem via case selection. We discuss the nuances of the less-invasive operative technique through case illustrations and intraoperative videos.

Methods A retrospective review of 46 consecutive cases of BSCMs, with their clinical and radiographic data, was performed. Nine cases were selected to illustrate seven different operative approaches, and discuss surgical nuances of the less invasive technique unique to each.

Results Postoperative morbidity, defined as an increase in modified Rankin scale, was observed in five patients (10.9%). A residual BSCM was present in two patients (4.3%); both underwent reoperation to remove the remainder. At follow-up of 31.1 ±  27.8 months, three patients experienced recurrence (6.5%). Overall, 65% of our patients improved, 20% stayed the same, and 11% worsened postsurgery. Two patients died, yielding a mortality of 4.3%.

Conclusion Using the less invasive resection technique for piecemeal BSCM removal, in appropriately selected patients, has yielded comparable to improved patient outcomes over existing large series. In our experience, lateral, anterolateral, and posterolateral approaches are favorable over direct midline (dorsal or ventral) approaches, unless the lesion comes to the surface. A thorough understanding of brain stem safe entry zones, in conjunction with appropriate approach selection, is key to a good outcome in challenging cases.