Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1991; 4(04): 144-149
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633270
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Effect of Suture Type on Stifle Joint Biomechanics After Extra-Articular Repair of Cranial Cruciate Ligament Transection in the Dog

J. M. Prostredny
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
M. S. Bauer
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
W. E. Blevins
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
W. R. Widmer
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
Jaqueline R. Davidson
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
S. W. Aiken
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
,
J. P. Toombs
1   From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 22 February 1991

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

Summary

The effect of two suture types, monofilament polybutester and braided polyester, on stifle joint biomechanics after extra-articular repair of cranial cruciate ligament rupture was evaluated by analysis of the instant centre of motion. The instant centres of motion and resulting velocity vectors were determined radiographically on both stifles of eight fresh canine cadavers before and after cranial cruciate ligament transection. After ligament transection, all 16 stifles were repaired with an extra-articular technique utilizing a double strand of suture placed between the lateral fabella and the tibial tuberosity. One stifle on each cadaver was repaired with each suture type. The instant centres of motion and resulting velocity vectors were re-evaluated post repair. All stifles had normal instant centres of motion prior to transection of the cranial cruciate ligament. Neither ligament transection nor extra-articular repair with either suture type resulted in an abnormal change in the instant centre of motion.

 
  • References

  • 1 Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Treatment. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1983: 306-16.
  • 2 Hulse DA, Shires PK. The Stifle Joint. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter DH. (ed.). Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1985: 2193-233.
  • 3 Shires PK, Hulse DA, Liu W. The under-and-over fascial replacement technique for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: A retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1984; 20: 69-77..
  • 4 Arnoczky SP, Tarvin GB, Marshall JL, Saltzman B. The over-the-top procedure: A technique for anterior cruciate ligament substitution in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1979; 15: 283-90..
  • 5 Pichler ME, Bacon JP, Evans JA. The fascia lata as a replacement for the cranial cruciate ligament: Two new surgical techniques. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1982; 18: 779-84..
  • 6 Hinko PJ. The use of a prosthetic ligament in repair of the torn anterior cruciate ligament in the dog. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981; 17: 567-83..
  • 7 Denny HR, Goodship AE. Replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with carbon fibre in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1980; 21: 279-86..
  • 8 DeAngelis M, Lau RE. A lateral retinacular imbrication technique for the surgical correction of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1970; 157: 79-84..
  • 9 Flo GL. Modification of the lateral retinacular imbrication technique for stabilizing cruciate ligament injuries. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1975; 11: 570-6..
  • 10 Gambardella PC, Wallace LJ, Cassidy F. Lateral suture technique for management of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in dogs: A retrospective study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1981; 17: 33-8..
  • 11 Pearson PT, McCurnin DM, Carter JD, Hoskins JD. Lembert suture technique to surgically correct ruptured cruciate ligaments. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1971; 7: 1-13..
  • 12 Hohn RB, Miller JM. Surgical correction of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1967; 150: 1133-41..
  • 13 Smith GK, Torg JS. Fibular head transposition for repair of cruciate-deficient stifle in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 375-83..
  • 14 Arnoczky SP, Torzilli PA, Marshall JL. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament repair in the dog: An analysis of the ICM. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13: 553-8..
  • 15 Frankel VH, Burstein AH, Brooks DB. Biomechanics of internal derangement of the knee. Pathomechanics as determined by analysis of the ICM. J Bone Joint Surg 1971; 53A: 945-62..
  • 16 Gerber C, Matter P. Biomechanical analysis of the knee after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament and its primary repair. An instant-centre analysis of function. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1983; 65: 391-9..
  • 17 Ireland WP, Rogers J, Myers RK. Location of the instantaneous center of rotation in the normal canine stifle. Am J Vet Res 1986; 47: 837-40..
  • 18 Rodeheaver GT, Borzelleca DC, Thacker JG, Edlich RF. Unique performance characteristics of Novafil® . Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987; 164: 230-6..
  • 19 Rodeheaver GT, Nesbit WS, Edlich RF. Novafil® Dynamic suture for wound closure. Ann Surg 1986; 204: 193-9..
  • 20 Piermattei DL, Greeley RG. An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones of the Dog and Cat. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1979: 164-5.