Subscribe to RSS
Download PDF
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633235
Comparison of Cerclage Wire Placement in Relation to a Neutralization Plate: A Mechanical and Histological Study
Publication History
Received for publication
15 January 1990
Publication Date:
10 February 2018 (online)
Summary
An oblique femoral osteotomy model was created to determine if placement of cerclage wires, in relation to a neutralization plate (under vs over), affects bone healing and mechanical strength. In phase I of the study, femora of five skeletally mature mixed breed dogs were stabilized with a neutralization plate and three cerclage wires. One femur from each dog had the cerclage wires placed under the plate and the opposite femur had the cerclage wires placed over the plate. One dog was eliminated from the study due to nonunion. At eight weeks, the osteotomy sites were subjected to a torsional load and studied histologically. In phase II, 40 pairs of femora were used to determine whether cerclage wire placement and size affected the mechanical strength of the bone-plate model when torsional loads were applied. Within the limits explored in this study, placement of cerclage wires under the plate resulted in an osteotomy which was more resistant to torsional loads and was more advanced histologically towards bone healing. Cerclage wires placed under the plate appeared to provide improved osteotomy stabilization. Cerclage wire size did not significantly influence the mechanical strength of the bone-plate model.
The comparison of cerclage wire placement in relation to a neutralization plate, using an oblique femoral osteotomy model, is discussed. Resistance to torsional loads was greater in eight week healed osteotomies when the cerclage wires had been placed under versus over a neutralization plate.
-
References
- 1 Hinko P J, Rhinelander F W. Effective use of cerclage in the treatment of long bone fractures in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1975; 166: 520-4.
- 2 Rudy R L. Principles of intramedullary pinning. Vet Clin North Am 1975; 5: 209-28.
- 3 Nunamaker D M. Methods of internal fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Newton C D, Nunamaker D M. (eds). J B Lippincott; Philadelphia: 1985: 261-86.
- 4 Müller M E, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of Internal Fixation. Springer; Berlin: 1979
- 5 Brinker W O, Hohn R B, Prieur W D. Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animals. Springer; New York: 1984
- 6 Nunamaker D M, Browman K F, Richardson D W, Herring M. Plate luting: a preliminary report of its use in horses. Vet Surg 1986; 15: 289-93.
- 7 Hayes W C, Perren S M. Bone-plate friction in the compression fixation of fractures. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1972; 89: 236-40.
- 8 Gambardella P C. Full cerclage wires for fixation of long bone fractures. Cont Educ 1980; 2: 665-71.
- 9 Withrow S J. Use and misuse of full cerclage wires in fracture repair. Vet Clin North Am 1978; 8: 201-12.
- 10 Withrow S J, Holmberg D L. Use of full cerclage wires in the fixation of 18 consecutive long bone fractures in small animals. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13: 735-43.
- 11 Newton C D, Hohn R B. Fracture nonunion resulting from cerclage appliances. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1974; 164: 503-8.
- 12 Piermattei D L, Greeley R G. An Atlas of Surgical Approaches to the Bones of the Dog and Cat. W B Saunders; Philadelphia: 1979: 162-3.
- 13 Finlay J B, Moroz T K, Rorabeck C H, Davey J R, Bourne R B. Stability of ten configurations of the Hoffman external-fixation frame. J Bone Jt Surg 1987; 69A: 734-44.
- 14 American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard test method for static bending properties of metallic bone plates. ASTM designation: F382-81. Vol 13.01. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Priemon-Storer R A. (ed). American Society for Testing and Materials; Philadelphia: 1985: 90-3.
- 15 Lewallen D G, Chao E Y S, Kasman R A, Kelly P J. Comparison of the effects of compression plates and external fixators on early bone healing. J Bone Jt Surg 1984; 66A: 1084-91.
- 16 Williams E A, Rand J A, An K-N, Chao E Y S, Kelly P J. The early healing of tibial osteotomies stabilized by one plane or two plane external fixation. J Bone Jt Surg 1987; 69: 355-65.
- 17 Wu J-J, Shyr H S, Chao E Y S, Kelly P J. Comparison of osteotomy healing under external fixation devices with different stiffness characteristics. J Bone Jt Surg 1984; 66A: 1258-64.
- 18 Gilber J A, Dahners L E, Atkinson M A. The effects of external fixation stiffness on early healing of transverse osteotomies. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 389-97.
- 19 Braden T D, Brinker W O. Radiologic and gross anatomic evaluation of bone healing in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976; 169: 1318-23.
- 20 Claes L. The mechanical and morphological properties of bone beneath internal fixation plates of differing rigidity. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 170-7.
- 21 Sarmiento A, Mullis D L, Latta L L, Tarr R R, Alvarez R. A quantitative comparative analysis of fracture healing under the influence of compression plating vs closed weight bearing treatment. Clin Orthop Rcl Res 1980; 149: 232-9.
- 22 White A A, Panjabi M M, Southwick W O. The four biomechanical stages of fracture repair. J Bone Jt Surg 1977; 59A: 188-92.
- 23 Panjabi M M, White A A, Wolf Jr. J A. A biomechanical comparison of flexible and rigid fracture fixation. In: Current Concepts of Internal Fixation of Fractures. Uhthoff H K. (ed). Springer; Berlin: 1980: 324-33.
- 24 Pcrren S M, Cordey J. The concept of interfragmentary strain. In: Current Concepts of Internal Fixation of Fractures. Uhthoff H K. (ed). Springer; Berlin: 1980: 63-77.
- 25 Gunst M A. Interference with bone blood supply through plating of intact bone. In: Current Concepts of Internal Fixation of Fracturs. Uhthoff H K. (ed). Springer; Berlin: 1980: 268-76.