Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 07(01): 35-39
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633042
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

A Finite Element Model of the Proximal Sesamoid Bones of the Horse Under Different Loading Conditions

K. N. Thompson
1   From the University of Kentucky, Department of Veterinary Science, Equine Research Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
,
T. K. Cheung
1   From the University of Kentucky, Department of Veterinary Science, Equine Research Center, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 25 May 1993

Publication Date:
06 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Fracture of the proximal sesamoid bones is a common injury of racing horses, usually resulting from over-dorsiflexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint. The purpose of this study was to develop a computer-aided method utilizing stereo-radiography, computed tomography, and finite element method to determine three-dimensional stress distribution in the proximal sesamoid bones during metacarpophalangeal joint dorsiflexion. The stress pattern was characterized by a compressive component on the articular part of the bone and a tensile component on the non-articular part of the bone. Maximum principal stresses were 2.5, 9.1 and 15.5 MPa and minimum principal stresses were -1.9, -9. 2 and -14. 9 MPa for metacarpophalangeal joint angles of 140°, 125° and 110°, respectively. The distal portion of the articular part of the bone experienced the largest compressive stress. In this study changes in the orientation and magnitude of the ligament force vectors did not significantly change stress patterns of the proximal sesamoid bone.

This study was designed to determine stress patterns of the proximal sesamoid bones in horses. Stress patterns were determined by finite element method analysis. Compressive stresses were present on the articular side, and tensile stresses were present on the nonarticular side of the bones. The magnitude of load applied to the bone did not appreciably change the pattern of stresses.

 
  • References

  • 1 Rooney JR. Biomechanics of Lameness in Horses. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1969
  • 2 Cheung TK, Thompson KN. Development of a three-dimensional electronic solids model of the lower leg of the horse. Vet Rad Ultrasound 1993; in Press.
  • 3 Carter DR, Hayes WC. The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg 1977; 59A: 954-62.
  • 4 Mosekilde L, Bentzen SM, Ortoft G, Jorgenson J. The predictive value of quantitative computed tomography for vertebral body compressive strength and ash density. Bone 1990; 10: 465-70.
  • 5 Riemersma DJ, Schamhardt HC. In vitro mechanical properties of equine tendons in relation to cross-sectional area and collagen content. Res Vet Sci 1985; 39: 263-70.
  • 6 Huiskes R, Chao EYS. A survey of finite element analysis in orthopedic biomechanics: The first decade. J Biomech 1983; 16: 385-409.
  • 7 Young DR, Nunamaker DM, Markel MD. Quantitative evaluation of the remodeling response of the proximal sesamoid bones to training-related stimuli in Thoroughbreds. Am J Vet Res 1991; 52: 1350-6.