An Experimental Study of Compression of Femoral Fractures by an Interlocking Intramedullary Pin

Summary

Return of function and callus healing were investigated in a group of ten dogs after osteotomy of the femur treated by application of a pin, perfo-rated by threaded openings, through which a metal bar could be introduced into the trochanteric fossa. A jig, indicating the position of the openings, was attached and the distal fragment fixed with three screws into the pin; the fracture was then compressed by means of a compressor travelling from the base of the jig to rest against the bar inserted into the trochanteric fossa, approximating the proximal fragment to the distal one. Two screws were then inserted into the proximal fragment. The results revealed a full return of limb function between four and 16 days and consolidation of the callus between eight and 16 weeks.

Femoral osteotomy was performed in a group of ten mongrel dogs weighing between 16 and 32 kg and stabilised with a pin, fixed with screws, which compressed the fracture. The results revealed return of normal limb function between four and 16 days later; consolidation of the callus was complete between eight and 16 weeks.

Keywords

Fracture - compression - pin - interlocking

• References

• 1 Prcsncll KR. Pins versus plates: the orthopedic dilemma. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1978; 8: 213-7.
• 2 DcYoung DJ, Probst CW. Methods of internal fracture fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. Slatter DH. (ed). Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1985: 1949-71.
• 3 Brinker WO, Piermattei DL, Flo GL. Handbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics and Fracturc Treatment. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990: 105-39.
• 4 Nunamaker DM. Methods of internal fixation. In: Textbook of Small Animal Ortho paedics. Newton CD, Nunamaker DM. (eds). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1985: 261-86.
• 5 Eggcr EL, Whittick WG. Principles of fracture management. In: Canine Orthopedics. Whittick WG. (ed). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1990: 215-96.
• 6 Schrader SC. Complications associated with the use of Steinmann intramedullary pins and cerclage wires for fixation of long-bone fractures. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1991; 21: 687-704.
• 7 Pricur WD, Sumner-Smith G. Aim of the AO/AS1 F technique. In: Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animals. Brinker WO, Hohn RB, Pricur WD. (eds). Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1984: 6-7.
• 8 Rosen H. Principles and application of bone plates. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1975; 5: 229-40.
• 9 Withrow SJ, Amis TC. Sciatic nerve injury associated with intramedullary fixation of femoral fractures. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1977; 13: 562-8.
• 10 Olmstead ML. Complications of fractures repaired with plates and screws. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1991; 21: 669-86.
• 11 Braden TD, Brinker WD. Effect of certain internal fixation devices on functional limb usage in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1973; 162: 642-6.
• 12 Sumner-Smith G, Waters EH. The adjunctive use of methyl methacrylate bone cement in the stabilization of multiple fractures. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1976; 12: 778-81.
• 13 Pezzoli G, Botti P, Del Bue M, Abatengelo G. Nuovo Chiodo Endomidollare in Fibre de Carbono e Kevlar. An Fac Med Vet Univ Parma 1986; VI: 81-9.
• 14 Church EM, Schrader SC. Use of flexible intermeduilary rods for fixation of femoral fractures in eight dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990; 196: 71-6.
• 15 Axelson P, Raiha J, Mevo M. et al. The use of a biodegradable implant in fracture fixation: a review of the literature and a report of two clinical cases. J Small Anim Pract 1988; 249-55.
• 16 Raiha JE, Parchman M, Krook L. et al. Fixation of trochanteric osteotomies in laboratory beagles with absorbable screws of polyactic acid. VCOT 1990; 3: 123-9.
• 17 Huckstep RL. The intramedullary compression nail for difficult femoral fractures. In: Concepts in Intramedullary Nailing. Seligson D. (ed). Grume & Stratton; 1985: 315-33.
• 18 Huckstep RL. The Huckstep interlocking nail for difficult humeral forearm and tibial fractures and for arthrodesis. Tech Orthop 1988; 3: 77-87.
• 19 Stoloff D. Fractures of the femur. In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. Bojrab MJ. (ed). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983: 655-73.
• 20 Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB. Fractures of the femur. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 149-60.
• 21 Richard MG, Mahesvaran VV. Studies on the osteosynthesis of long bones in canines and felines with intramedullary pins. Ind Vet J 1973; 50: 1038-45.
• 22 Eaton-Wells RD, Matis U, Robins GM, Whittick WG. Pelvic fractures. In: Canine Orthopedics. Whittick WG. (ed). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1990: 387-470.
• 23 Gilmore DR. Internal fixation of femoral fractures. In: Current Techniques in Small Animal Surgery. Bojrab MJ. (ed). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1990: 682-93.
• 24 Durall I, Diaz MC, Morales I. Unpublished data.
• 25 Braden TD, Brinker WD. Radiologic and gross anatomic evaluation of bone healing in the dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1976; 169: 1318-23.
• 26 Rosen H. Radiographic interpretation: fracture healing. In: Manual of Internal Fixation in Small Animals. Brinker WD, Hohn RB, Prieur WD. (eds). Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1984: 116-24.
• 27 Perren SM. Bone healing. In: Manual of Internal Fixation. Muller ME, Allower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. (eds). Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1991: 66-72.