Digital radiography

J. S. Mattoon

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1632988

Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Table of Contents

Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2006; 19(03): 123-132
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632988

Invited Review Article

Schattauer GmbH

Digital radiography

J. S. Mattoon

¹Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Summary

Digital radiography has been used in human medical imaging since the 1980's with recent and rapid acceptance into the veterinary profession. Using advanced image capture and computer technology, radiographic images are viewed on a computer monitor. This is advantageous because radiographic images can be adjusted using dedicated computer software to maximize diagnostic image quality. Digital images can be accessed at computer workstations throughout the hospital, instantly retrieved from computer archives, and transmitted via the internet for consultation or case referral. Digital radiographic data can also be incorporated into a hospital information system, making record keeping an entirely paperless process. Digital image acquisition is faster when compared to conventional screen-film radiography, improving workflow and patient throughput. Digital radiography greatly reduces the need for “retake” radiographs because of wide latitude in exposure factors. Also eliminated are costs associated with radiographic film and x-ray film development. Computed radiography, charged coupled devices, and flat panel detectors are types of digital radiography systems currently available.

Keywords

Veterinary digital radiography

Full Text

References

References
1 Roberts G, Graham J. Computed Radiography. In Kraft S, Roberts G, eds: Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract: Modern Diagnostic Imaging. Philadelphia, WB Saunders. 2001; 47-62.
2 Roberts G. Computed radiography: How it works and its advantages. The AAEP 2000 Resort Symposium Lecture Workbook. 2000 February; 4-6.
3 Mattoon JS, Smith CA. Breakthroughs in radiology: computed radiography. Compend Contin Educ Prac Vet 2004; 26: 58-66.
4 Integrating the Veterinary Healthcare Enterprise. http://www.animalinsides.com/ivhe_site/index.html (accessed April 30,2006).
5 Murphey MD, Bramble JM, Cook LT. et al. Non-displaced fractures: Spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 1990; 174: 865-70.
6 Lund PJ, Krupinski EA, Pereles S. et al. Comparison of conventional and computed radiography: Assessment of image quality and reader performance in skeletal extremity trauma. Acad Radiol 1997; 4: 570-6.
7 Swee RG, Gray JE, Beabout JW. et al. Screen-film versus computed radiography imaging of the hand: A direct comparison. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 539-42.
8 Don S, Hildebolt CF, Sharp TL. et al. Computed radiography versus screen-film radiography: Detection of pulmonary edema in a rabbit model that stimulates neonatal pulmonary infiltrates. Radiology 1999; 213: 455-60.
9 American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Acceptance Testing and Quality Control of Photo Stimulable Phosphor Imaging Systems: Report of Task Group #10, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Available at www.thecapturedi mage.com/pdf/aapm10v3.doc (accessed May 1, 2006).
10 Merge eMed. http://www.merge.com (accessed May 1,2006).
11 Osirix. http://www.osirix.com (accessed May 1, 2006).
12 IDEXX Laboratories. http://www.idexx.com/animalhealth/digital (accessed April 10,2006).
13 Summit Innovet. http://www.innovet4vets.com http://www.imagingdynamics.com (accessed April 10,2006).
14 AGFA. http://www.agfa.com/en/he/products_services/prod_cat/index.jsp (accessed May 1,2006).
15 Fujifilm Medical Systems. http://www.fujimed.com (accessed May 1,2006).
16 Kodak. http://www.kodak.com/global/en/health/productsByType/cr/crVet_Productjhtml?pq-path=7630 (accessed May 1,2006).
17 Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM. et al. The essential physics of medical imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2002
18 Eklin Medical Systems, Inc. http://www.eklm.com (accessed May 1,2006).
19 Sound Technologies. http://www.soundvet.com (accessed May 1,2006).
20 Ogoda M. DICOM 101: Understanding the basics of DICOM. Insights & Images: The user's publication of computed radiography. Stamford, CT: Fujifilm Medical Systems; 2001. 2 4.
21 Horii S. A nontechnical introduction to DICOM. RSNA. http://www.rsna.org/Technology?DICOM/intro/ accessed April 30 2006
22 Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). http://medical.nema.org.
23 A practical guide to DICOM. Toshiba Medical Systems. http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp? Accessed April 30 2006
24 Seigel EL, Kolodner RM. (eds) Filmless radiology. Springer-Verlag New York: 1999
25 Hruby W. (ed) Digital (r)evolution. Springer-Verlag New York: 2001
26 Dreyer K, Mehta A, Thrall J. PACS: A guide to the digital revolution. Springer-Verlag New York: 2002
27 Cesar LJ, Schuuler BA, Zink FE. et al. Artefacts found in computed radiography. Br J Radiol 2001; 74: 195-202.
28 McLear RC, Handmaker H, Schmidt W. et al. “Uberschwinger” or “rebound effect” artifact in computed radiographic imaging of metallic implants in veterinary medicine. In: American College of Veterinary Radiology 2003 Annual Scientific Conference Proceedings. December 2-6 2003. Chicago, Illinois.: