Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16(04): 250-254
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632787
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Effect of weight bearing on the joint angles of the fore- and hind limb of the dog[*]

C. Watson
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
,
M. Rochat
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
,
M. Payton
1   Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA
› Author AffiliationsSpecial thanks to Jennifer Strong-Klefenz for illustrations and to Sue Mott and the radiology department for their help.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 05 January 2003

Accepted 15 May 2003

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

In the dog the correct angles for arthrodesis of limb joints have been published in the veterinary literature. They can also be obtained by measuring the joint angles of the contralateral limb from a standing lateral radiograph. This study was undertaken to determine if increased weight-bearing had a significant effect on joint angles. Standing lateral radiographs of the foreand hind limbs were taken of dogs standing on all four legs and then with their contralateral limb elevated. A significant difference was found between the angles of the metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints (p ≤ 0.05) when the dog was bearing weight on all four limbs compared to when the contralateral limb was elevated. Significant differences were not found for the other joints that were evaluated (shoulder, elbow, antebrachial carpal, stifle tibiotarsal).

Keywords

Arthrodesis - weight bearing - joint angle

* This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Oklahoma State University


 

  • References

  • 1 Denny HR. Arthrodesis in the dog. Veterinary Annual 1990; 30: 269-76.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in laboratory retrievers. AJVR 2002; 63: 979-86.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lesser AS. Arthrodesis. In Slatter D 1993; 02: 1888-1901.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Newton CD. Principles and techniques of arthrodesis. In: Newton CD, Nunamaker JB. (eds). Textbook of Small Animal Orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Lippicott Co; 1985: 565-75.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Penwick RC. Arthrodesis. Vet Clin North Am 1987; 17: 821-39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rochat MC, Mann FA. Metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis in three dogs. J Am Animal Hosp Assoc 1998; 34: 158-63.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 van Ee RT, Blass CE. Arthrodesis of metatarsophalangeal joints in a dog. JAVMA 1989; 194: 82-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Whitelock RG, Dyce J, Houlton JE. Metacarpal fractures associated with pancarpal arthrodesis in dogs. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 25-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar