Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09(02): 66-74
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632505
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of the Leeds-Keio Synthetic Replacement for the Cranial Cruciate Ligament in Dogs: An Experimental Study

P. B. Vasseur
1   From the Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA
,
S. Griffey
1   From the Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA
,
B. J. Massat
1   From the Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 21 August 1995

Publication Date:
23 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Eight conditioned research dogs, whose body weight was between 25 and 30 kg, had unilateral implantation of a Leeds-Keio (LK) synthetic implant (Dacron polyester) immediately after severance and removal of the cranial cruciate ligament (CCL). A rectangular- shaped autograft, composed of fascia lata, was placed within the LK implant in four of the eight dogs; the other four dogs received the LK implant only. Modified Robert Jones bandages were placed on the limbs that had been operated upon; the bandages were left in place for 48 hours. After that time the limbs were not splinted. The dogs were confined to 1.5 m X 3 m kennels, with twice daily leash walks for the duration of the study. Although the joints that received the LK implants were stable immediately after the operation, they all developed progressive effusion, crepitation and instability accompanied by clinically apparent lameness. All of the dogs were euthanatized three months after the operations. Gross examination of the eight joints that had been operated upon confirmed the presence of degenerative joint disease. Three of the eight dogs had “bucket handle” type tears of their medial meniscus in the joints with the LK implant, and the medial menisci in the other five stifle joints that received LK implants had a fibrillated surface texture. Five of the eight LK implants had either ruptured completely or were stretched and frayed to the point where mechanical testing was not justified. Mean breaking strength of the 3 intact LK implants was 6.6% of the contralateral, control CCL. Ingrowth of fibrous tissue into the LK implants was minimal. The synovium from all joints with LK implants had moderate to severely increased cellularity within the synovial villi and supporting stroma consisting predominantly of lymphocytes, plasma cells and macrophages. Multinucleated giant cells formed aggregates around irregular shaped strands of particulate material which was translucent and refractive. Under polarized light, these particles were bright yellow to green consistent with Dacron particles. It was concluded that the LK implant, as implanted in this study, was not a satisfactory replacement for the CCL in dogs.

The Leeds-Keio synthetic replacement for the canine cranial cruciate ligament was implanted in eight dogs. All eight dogs developed progressive instability and secondary degenerative joint disease over a period of three months after the operation. It was concluded that the Leeds-Keio ligament, as implanted in this study, is not satisfactory for use in dogs.

Keywords

Cranial cruciate ligament - Leeds-Keio - degenerative joint disease - canine - lameness
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Vasseur PB. Clinical results following nonoperative management for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Vet Surg 1984; 13 (04) 243-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Vasseur PB. The stifle joint. In: Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 2nd edition. Slatter D. (ed) Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co; 1993: 1817-65.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Daniel DM. Principles of knee ligament surgery. In: Knee Ligaments. Structure, Function, Injury and Repair. Daniel DM, Akeson W, O’Connor J. (eds) New York: Raven Press; 1990: 11-29.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Seedhom BB. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H. J Engineer in Med 1992; 206 (01) 15-27.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Friedman MJ. Prosthetic anterior cruciate ligament. Clinics in Sports Med 1991; 10 (03) 499-513.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 McLoughlin SJ, Smith RB. The Leeds-Keio prosthesis in chronic anterior cruciate deficiency. Clin Orthop 1992; 283: 215-22.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fujikawa K, Iseki F. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Leeds-Keio artificial ligament. Bull Hosp for Joint Diseases Ortho Inst 1991; 51 (02) 140-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Marcacci M, Gubellini P, Buda R, De Pasquale V, Strocchi R, Molgora AP, Zaffagnini S, Guizzardi S, Ruggeri A. Histologic and ultrastructural findings of tissue ingrowth. The Leeds-Keio prosthetic anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 1991; 267: 115-21.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Vasseur PB, Pool RR, Arnoczky SP, Lau RE. Correlative biomechanical and histologic study of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1985; 46 (09) 1842-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 MacNicol MF, Penny ID, Sheppard L. Early results of the Leeds-Keio anterior cruciate ligament replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73 B (03) 377-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ryan WG, Banks AJ. A failure mechanism of Leeds-Keio ligaments. Injury 1994; 25: 443-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Penner DA, Daniel DM, Wood P, Mishra D. An in vitro study of anterior cruciate ligament implant placement and isometry. Am J Sports Med 1988; 16: 238-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Amis AA, Dawkins GPC. Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Fibre bundle actions related to ligament replacements and injuries. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73 B (02) 260-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Arnoczky SP. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 1983; 172: 19-25.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Arnoczky SP, Marshall JL. The cruciate ligaments of the canine stifle: An anatomical and functional analysis. Am J Vet Res 1977; 38: 1809-14.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Prescott RJ, Ryan WG, Bisset DL. Histopathological features of failed prosthetic Leeds-Keio anterior cruciate ligaments. J Clin Path 1994; 47 (04) 375-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schindhelm K, Rogers GJ, Milthorpe BK, Hall PJ, Howlett CR, Sekel R, Goldberg J, Viglione W. Autograft and Leeds-Keio reconstructions of the ovine anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 1991; 267: 278-93.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Arnoczky SP. Animal models for knee ligament research. In: Knee Ligaments. Structure, Function, Injury and Repair. Daniel DM, Akeson W, O’Connor J. (eds) New York: Raven Press; 1990: 401-17.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Marshall JL, Olsson SE. Instability of the knee: a long-term experimental study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg 1971; 53 A 1561-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dandy DJ, Gray AJ. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Leeds-Keio prosthesis plus extra-articular tenodesis. Results after six years. J Bone Joint Surg 1994; 76 (02) 193-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Engstrom B, Wredmark T, Westblad P. Patellar tendon or Leeds-Keio graft in the surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Clin Orthop 1993; 295: 190-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 López-Vázquez E, Juan JA, Vila E, Debón J. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with a dacron prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73 A (09) 1294-1300.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar