Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1996; 09(02): 43-52
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632502
Survey Report
Schattauer GmbH

A Survey of Orthopaedic Conditions in Small Animal Veterinary Practice in Britain

M. G. Ness
1   From the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association, Disley, Stockport, Cheshire, UK
,
R. H. Abercromby
1   From the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association, Disley, Stockport, Cheshire, UK
,
C. May
1   From the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association, Disley, Stockport, Cheshire, UK
,
B. M. Turner
1   From the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association, Disley, Stockport, Cheshire, UK
,
S. Carmichael
1   From the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association, Disley, Stockport, Cheshire, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received for publication 11 November 1995

Publication Date:
23 February 2018 (online)

Summary

A two-month survey of small animal orthopaedic conditions was conducted by members of British Veterinary Orthopaedic association. Clinicians from 42 clinics participated from a variety of practice including referral, primary care and teaching institutions. A total of 1627 cases were recorded. The case load was dominated by dogs with evidence that in UK cats are underrepresented in veterinary orthopaedic practice. Evidence of breed predisposition to orthopaedic disease in dogs was not detected. The importance of trauma in younger patients and degenerative diseases in older dogs was confirmed. A strong similarity between the case loads seen at primary care and referral practices was recorded. The results of this survey may be useful to those planning clinical orthopaedic teaching and research programmes.

Members of BVOA recorded and collated details of all orthopaedic cases seen during February and March 1994. The case load was dominated by dogs with evidence that cats are underrepresented in orthopaedic practice. There were striking similarities between the case loads of primary care and referral institutes. The findings of this survey may help those responsible for planning clinical orthopaedic teaching and research.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Priester WA, Schirmer TG, Riner MP. A oneyear analysis of veterinary patients, diagnoses and operations at Michigan State University. J Am Vet Med Association 1966; 148: 666-71.
  • 2 Priester WA. A summary of diagnoses in the ox, horse, dog and cat from 12 Veterinary School Clinics in the US and Canada. Vet Record 1970; 86: 654-8.
  • 3 Humphreys JM. The incidence of diseases of small animals seen in a Melbourne clinic. Thesis. University of Sydney. Cited in Johnson SA, Austin A, Brever GJ. V.C.O.T 1994; 2: 7
  • 4 Phillips IR. A survey of bone fractures in the dog and cat. J.S.A.P 1979; 20: 661-74.
  • 5 Kolata RJ, Johnston DE. Motor vehicle accidents in urban dogs: a study of 600 cases. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1975; 167: 938-41.
  • 6 Johnson JA, Austin C, Bruer GJ. Incidence of canine Appendicular Musculoskeletal Disorders in 16 Veterinary teaching hospitals from 1980 through 1989. V.C.O.T 1994; 7: 56-69.
  • 7 Denny HR. Condylar fractures of the humerus in the dog; a review of 133 cases. J.S.A.P 1983; 24: 185-97.