Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2015; 34(04): 293-296
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1627576
Geist & Gehirn
Schattauer GmbH

Kleider machen Leute

M. Spitzer Ulm
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Adam H, Galinsky AD. Enclothed cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2012; 48: 918-925.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Aiken LR. The relationship of dress to selected measures of personality in undergraduate women. Journal of social psychology 1963; 59: 119-128.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Aliakbari M, Abdollahi K. Does it matter what we wear? A sociolinguistic study of clothing and human values. International Journal of Linguistics 2013; 05: 34-45.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Buckley HM. Attraction toward a stranger as a linear function of similarity in dress. Home Economics Research Journal 1983; 12: 25-34.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 DeLong MR, Salusso-Deonier C, Larntz K. Use of perceptions of female dress as an indicator of role definition. Home Economics Research Journal 1983; 11: 327-336.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Forsythe SM, Drake MF, Cox Jr CA. Dress as an influence on the perceptions of management characteristics in women. Home Economics Research Journal 1984; 13: 112-121.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Frank MG, Gilovich T. The dark side of self and social perception: black uniforms and aggression in professional sports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988; 54: 74-85.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA, Noll SM, Quinn DM, Twenge JM. That swimsuit becomes you: sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, andmath performance. J Pers SocPsychol 1988; 75: 269-284.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Gino F, Norton MI, Ariely D. The counterfeit self: the deceptive costs of faking it. Psychological Science 2010; 21: 712-720.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Johnson K, Lennon SJ, Rudd N. Dress, body and self: research in the social psychology of dress. Fashion and Textiles 2014; 01: 20.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Johnson TW, Francis SK, Burns LD. Appearance managemen tbehavior and the five factor model of personality. Clothing& Textiles Research Journal 2007; 25: 230-243.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Jones MA. The effect of attire on forensic competitors and judges: does clothing make a difference?. National Forensic Journal 1987; 05: 66-79.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Lennon SJ, Miller FG. Salience of physical appearance in impression formation. Home Economics Research Journal 1984; 13: 95-104.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Martins Y, Tiggemann M, Kirkbride A. Those Speedos become them: the role of self-objectification in gay and heterosexual men’s body image. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007; 33: 634-647.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Morris TL, Gorham J, Cohen SH, Huffman D. Fashion in the classroom: Effects of attire on student perceptions of instructors in college classes. Communication Education 1996; 45: 135-148.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Paek SL. Effect of garment style on the perception of personal traits. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 1996; 05: 10-16.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Rosenfeld LB, Plax TG. Clothing as communication. Journal of Communication 1977; 27: 24-31.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Spitzer M. Assoziative Netzwerke, formale Denkstörungen und Schizophrenie: Zur experimentellen Psychopathologie sprachabhängiger Denkprozesse. Der Nervenarzt 1993; 64: 147-159.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Spitzer M. Die Farbe Rot. Nervenheilkunde 2005; 24: 640-641.
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Spitzer M. Die Farbe des Denkens. Nervenheilkunde 2009; 28: 320-323.
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thourlby W. You are what you wear. New York, NY: New American Library; 1978
    Google Scholar