Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25(12): 1003-1007
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626811
Arbeiten zum Schwerpunkt - Theme Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Evidenz-basierte Ergotherapie bei Menschen mit Schlaganfall

Der betätigungsorientierte AnsatzEvidence-based occupational therapy for persons with stroke - occupation-based approach
S. George
1   Ergotherapeutin, Vorstandsmitglied im Deutschen Verband der Ergotherapeuten e.V. (DVE), Neurologisches Krankenhaus München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Ergotherapie ist ein wichtiger Teil der Schlaganfallrehabilitation, da sie erwiesenermaßen Leistungen bei subjektiv wichtigen Alltagstätigkeiten und die Teilhabe am sozialen Leben verbessert. Allerdings kommen für die Verbesserung von Alltagsleistungen bei Schlaganfallpatienten eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Techniken und Strategien zum Einsatz, und viele davon sind bisher nicht ausreichend auf ihre Wirksamkeit untersucht. Aus diesem Grund beschreibt dieser Artikel ergotherapeutische Grundprinzipien für die Befunderhebung und Therapie, die in der Ergotherapie momentan als besonders effektiv diskutiert werden. Außerdem werden wichtige Fragen für künftige Forschungsvorhaben formuliert.

Summary

Occupational therapy is an important part of stroke rehabilitation, as it has been found to improve activities of daily life and social participation. However,a broad variety of techniques and strategies are used to improve occupational performance after stroke, and for many there is not yet enough evidence regarding their efficacy. Therefore, this article describes principles of occupational therapy assessment and intervention that are discussed as most effective in contemporary occupational therapy, and important questions for further research.

Schlüsselwörter

Ergotherapie - Schlaganfall - Betätigung - Wirksamkeit

Keywords

Occupational therapy - stroke - performances of daily life - efficacy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Booth J, Davidson I, Winstanley J, Waters K. Observing washing and dressing of stroke patients: nursing intervention compared with occupational therapists. What is the difference? Issues and Innovations in Nursing Practice 2001; 33: 98-105.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Drummond AER, Walker MF. A randomized controlled trial of leisure rehabilitation after stroke. Clin Rehabil 1995; 09: 283-90.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 DVE (Deutscher Verband der Ergotherapeuten). Ergotherapie heute. Karlsbad: DVE 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Fisher AG. AMPS. Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Volume 1: Development, Standardization, and Administration Manual. 5th Ed.. Fort Collins, Colorado, USA: Three Star Press, Inc; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Freivogel S. Zerebral bedingte Paresen und Spastik. Welche Physiotherapie hilft? Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25: 105-10.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 George S. Das AMPS (Assessment of Motor and Process Skills). Ergotherapie & Rehabilitation 2006; 07: 6-12.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 George S. Praxishandbuch COPM. Darstellung des COPM und Entwicklung eines Praxisleitfadens zur Durchführung des Interviews in der neurologischen Klinik. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Geusgens C, van Heugten C, Donkervoort M, van den Ende E, Jolles J, van den Heuvel W. Transfer of training effects in stroke patients with apraxia: an exploratory study. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2006; 16: 213-9.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gibson JW, Schkade JK. Occupational adaptation intervention with patients with cerebrovascular accident: a clinical study. AmJ Occup Ther 1997; 51: 523-9.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Goldenberg G, Pössl J, Ziegler W. (Hrsg.). Neuropsychologie im Alltag. Stuttgart ,New York: Thieme; 2002: 4.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Götze R, Pössl J, Ziegler W. Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit der Alltagsorientierten Therapie (AOT) bei Patienten mit erworbener Hirnschädigung. Neurol Rehabil 2005; 11: 13-20.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Haggard P, Cockburn J, Cock J, Fordham C, Wade D. Interference between gait and cognitive tasks in a rehabilitating neurological population. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 479-86.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hyndman D, Ashburn A. People with stroke living in the community: attention deficits, balance, ADL ability and falls. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 817-22.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jäncke L. Plastizität im Alter. Neurogeriatrie 2005; 02: 34.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Kizony R, Katz N. Relationship between cognitive abilities and the process skills and skills of the assessment of motor and process skills (AMPS) in patients with stroke. Occupation, Participation, and Health 2002; 22: 82-92.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Klos T, Koch A. Einsatz der kontraläsionalen Hand im Alltag kann chronischen visuellen Neglect verbessern: ein Fallbericht. Ergotherapie & Rehabilitation 1999; 02: 94-100.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kolster F. Therapieziele in der Neurologie. Unterricht – Konzeption – Anwendung. 2. Aufl. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Landi F, Cesari M, Onder G, Tafani A, Zamboni V, Cocchi A. Effects of an occupational therapy program on functional outcomes in older stroke patients. Gerontology 2006; 52: 85-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Latham NK, Jette DU, Coster W. et al. Occupational therapy activities and intervention techniques for clients with stroke in six rehabilitation hospitals. Am J Occup Ther 2006; 60: 369-78.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Lindén A, Boschian K, Eker C, Schalén W, Nordström C-H. Assessment of motor and process skills reflects brain-injured patients´ ability to resume independent living better than neuropsychological tests. Acta Neurol Scand 2005; 111: 48-53.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, Hui-Chan CW. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 1403-8.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Logan PA, Gladman JRF, Avery A, Walker MF, Dys J, Groom L. Randomised controlled trial of an occupational therapy intervention to increase outdoor mobility after stroke. BMJ. 2004 329. 1372-5 (doi: 10.1136/bmj.38264.679560.8F).
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Michel JA, Mateer CA. Attention rehabilitation following stroke and traumatic brain injury. A review. Eur Med Phys 2006; 42: 59-67.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Miesen M, Christopher A, Mentrup C. Begriffsbestimmung Ergotherapie. In: DVE / Miesen M. (Hrsg.): Berufsprofil Ergotherapie 2004. Idstein: Schulz-Kirchner 2004: 151-71.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Rogers JC, Figone JL. Traumatic quadriplegia: follow up study of self-care skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980; 61: 316-21.
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, Wood VA. Recovery after Stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 5-8.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Söderback I. The effectiveness of training intellectual functions in adults with acquired brain damage. Scand J Rehab Med 1988; 20: 47-56.
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Steultjens EM, Dekker J, Bouter LM. et al. Occupational therapy for community dwelling elderly people: a systematic review. Stroke 2003; 34: 676-87.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Trombly CA, Ma H-I. A synthesis of the effects of occupational therapy for persons with stroke, part I: Restoration of roles, tasks and activities. Am J Occup Ther 2002; 59: 250-9.
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Walker CM, Walker MF, Sunderland A. Dressing after stroke: a survey of current occupational therapy practice. Br J Occup Ther 2003; 66: 263-8.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Walker MF, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P. et al. Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of community occupational therapy for stroke patients. Stroke 2004; 35: 2226-32.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Walker MF, Drummond AER, Lincoln NB. Evaluation of dressing practice for stroke patients after discharge from hospital: a crossover design study. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10: 23-31.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Weingarden SI, Martin C. Independent dressing after spinal cord injury: a functional time evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 518-9.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002; 16: 1-14.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Yerxa EJ, Baum S. Engagement in daily occupations and life satisfaction among people with spinal cord injuries. Occup Ther J Res 1986; 06: 271-83.
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Yerxa EJ, Locker SB. Quality of time use by adults with spinal cord injuries. Am J Occup Ther 1990; 44: 318-26.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Perfetti C. Der hemiplegische Patient. Kognitivtherapeutische Übungen. München: Pflaum 1997
    Google Scholar