Download PDF
Nervenheilkunde 2006; 25(03): 123-128
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1626452
Arbeiten zum Schwerpunkt - Theme Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Was können wir aus bildgebenden Verfahren für die motorische Rehabilitation lernen?

Lessons learned from functional imaging with respect to motor rehabilitation
C. Dettmers
1   Kliniken Schmieder Konstanz
,
F. Hamzei
2   Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
M. Rijntjes
3   Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Freiburg
,
C. Weiller
3   Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinik Freiburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Einzelbefunde aus den Reorganisationsstudien nach Hirninfarkt machen es schwierig, ein einheitliches und einfaches Reorganisationskonzept zu erkennen. Querschnittsstudien zeigen eine vermehrte Aktivierung in einem bilateralen Netzwerk mit den homologen, kontraläsionalen Strukturen und einer vermehrten Aktivierung um den Infarkt herum. Die Reorganisation läuft phasenhaft ab mit einer frühen Aktivitätsminderung (Diaschisis), gefolgt von einer Hochregulation und Überaktivierung und einer späten Rückkehr zum Ausgangsniveau. Die Phasen sind in der betroffenen und nicht betroffenen Hemisphäre zeitlich versetzt. Studien zum motorischen Lernen zeigen mindestens zwei Phasen. Interessant werden funktionelle bildgebende Verfahren bei der Multiplen Sklerose, da hier schon sehr frühzeitig Reorganisationsphänomene dargestellt werden können.

Summary

A variety of functional imaging studies conducted with post stroke patients – sometimes with contradictory results– are cited and discussed without providing clear and straight forward concepts regarding of reorganization after stroke. Studies concerning motor learning are of paramount importance for rehabilitation although there are incomplete conclusions from research on physiological motor learning. Recent functional imaging studies on multiple sclerosis are of potential interest. They possibly indicate reorganization at an early stage even before structural lesions can be recognized.

Schlüsselwörter

Plastizität - motorisches Lernen - Rehabilitation - Reorganisation - Hirninfarkt - Multiple Sklerose

Keywords

Plasticity - motoric learning - rehabilitation - reorganization - stroke - multiple sclerosis
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for exercise and training. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Celnik PA, Cohen LG. Modulation of motor function and cortical plasticity in health and disease. Rest Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 261-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RSJ, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RSJ. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1991; 29: 63-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong K, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 2518-27.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cramer S, Bastings E. Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology 2000; 39: 842-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Modified version of Taub training improves functional outcome after stroke. Arch Phys Med and Rehabil 2005; 86: 204-9.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Dettmers C, Hamzei F, Teske U, Buechel C, Weiller C. fMRI discriminates between physiological motor learning and reorganization in a stroke patient. In: Dettmers C, Weiller C. (Hrsg). Update Neurologische Rehabilitation. Bad Honnef: Hippocampus Verlag; 2005: 201-6.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players. Science 1995; 270: 305-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, Bussel B, Cazalis F, Pierot L. et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33: 1610-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Floyer-Lea A, Matthews PM. Distinguishable brain activation networks for shortand long-term motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94: 512-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gierse A, Dettmers C, Rijntjes M, Rzanny R, Gaser C, Kiebel S, Kaiser W, Weiller C. Interhemispheric accessibility and transfer of motor engrams. In: Dettmers C, Weiller C. (Hrsg). Update Neurologische Rehabilitation. Bad Honnef: Hippocampus Verlag; 2005: 244-52.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Hamzei F, Krüger H, Peters M, Ketels G, Rijntjes M, Weiller C. Forced use Therapie der unteren Extremität. Aktuelle Neurologie 2005; 32 4, 212.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Hauptmann B, Reinhart E, Brandt SA, Karni A. The predictive value of the leveling off of within session performance for procedural memory consolidation. Cogn Brain Res 2005; 24: 181-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jeschke C. Physiotherapie in der neurologischen Therapie. In: Nelles G. (Hrsg). Neurologische Rehabilitation. Stuttgart: Thieme 2004: 61-73.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth M, Matthews P. A TMS study of the functional significance of ipsilateral motor cortical activation after stroke. Neuroimage 2002; 16: 700.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Johansen-Berg H, Dawes H, Guy C. et al. Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain 2002; 115: 2731-42.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kaas JH, Qi H-X. The reorganization of the motor system inprimates after the loss of a limb. Rest Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 145-52.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998; 95: 861-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Liepert J, Tegenthoff M, Malin JP. Changes of cortical motor area size during immobilisation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 97: 382-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Liepert J, Miltner W, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E, Weiller C. Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998; 250: 5-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Liepert J, Hamzei F, Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1761-3.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, Taub E, Weiller C. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31: 1210-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Liepert J. Bedeutung der TMS für die Rehabilitationsforschung. In: Dettmers C, Weiller C. (Hrsg). Update Neurologische Rehabilitation. Bad Honnef: Hippocampus Verlag 2005: 190-200.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Matthews PM, Johansen-Berg H, Reddy H. Noninvasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: Applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation. Rest Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 245-60.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Nelles G, Spiekermann G, Jueptner M. et al. Evolution of functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke: a serial positron emission tomographic activation study. Ann Neurol 1999; 46: 901-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nelles G, Jentzen W, Jueptner M, Muller S, Diener HC. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. NeuroImage 2001; 13: 1146-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pantano P, Iannetti GD, Caramia F, Mainero C, Di Legge S, Bozzao L, Pozzilli C, Lenzi GL. Cortical motor reorganization after a single clinical attack of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2002; 125: 1607-15.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Pascual-Leone A, Wassermann EM, Sadato N, Hallett M. The role of reading activity on the modulation of motor cortical outputs to the reading hand in Braille readers. Ann-Neurol 1995; 38: 910-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Reddy H, Narayanan S, Arnoutelis R, Jenkinson M, Antel J, Matthews PM, Arnold DL. Evidence for adaptive functional changes in the cerbral cortex with axonal injury from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2000; 123: 2314-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rijntjes M. Functional imaging in Multiple Sclerosis: Lessons for imaging in stroke and vice versa. Editorial. J Magnetic Resonance Imaging. im Druck..
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Rijntjes M. Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: new insights, old questions and the meaning of therapies. Curr Op Neurol. in press..
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Rijntjes M, Hobbeling V, Hamzei F, Dohse S, Ketels G, Liepert J, Weiller C. Individual factors in constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2005; 19: 238-49.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Shepherd RB, Carr JH. Scientific basis of neurological physiotherapy. Bridging the gap between science and practice. In: Dettmers C, Weiller C. (Hrsg). Update Neurologische Rehabilitation. Bad Honnef: Hippocampus Verlag 2005: 61-71.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Toni I, Ramnani N, Josephs O, Ashburner J, Passingham RE. Learning arbitrary visuomotor associations: temporal dynamic of brain activity. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 1048-57.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 van Mier HI, Perlmutter JS, Petersen SE. Functional changes in brain activity during acquisition and practice of movement sequences. Motor control 2004; 08: 500-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ward NS, Brown MM, Thomson AJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126: 1430-48.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, Wise RSJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol 1992; 31: 463-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RSJ, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol 1993; 33: 181-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Yousry TA, Berry I, Filippi M. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 64 (Suppl. 01) S85-87.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Zemke A, Heagerty P, Lee C, Cramer S. Motor cortex organization after stroke is related to side of stroke and level of recovery. Stroke 2003; 34: E23-28.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Carey JR, Kimberley TJ, Leweis SM, Auerbach EJ, Dorsey L, Rundquist P, Ugurbil K. Analysis of fMRI and finger tracking training in subjects with chronc stroke. Brain 2002; 125: 773-88.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Miltner WHR, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke. A replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 aub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW, Fleming WD, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficits after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-54.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar