Download PDF
Nuklearmedizin 2002; 41(01): 22-29
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1623997
Originalarbeiten – Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

F-18-FDG-hybrid-camera-PET in patients with postoperative fever

F-18-FDG-Hybrid-Kamera-PET bei Patienten mit postoperativem Fieber
J. Meller
1   Abteilung Nuklearmedizin
,
C. O. Sahlmann
2   Zentrum Innere Medizin, Georg August Universität, Göttingen, Deutschland
,
K. Lehmann
1   Abteilung Nuklearmedizin
,
U. Siefker
1   Abteilung Nuklearmedizin
,
I. Meyer
1   Abteilung Nuklearmedizin
,
K. Schreiber
2   Zentrum Innere Medizin, Georg August Universität, Göttingen, Deutschland
,
G. Altenvoerde
1   Abteilung Nuklearmedizin
,
W. Becker
1   Abteilung Nuklearmedizin
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen: 30 July 2001

in revidierter Form: 28 September 2001

Publication Date:
10 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Aim: Evaluation of F-18-FDG-hybrid-camera-PET imaging in patients with undetermined postoperative fever (POF). Methods: Prospective study of 18 patients (9 women, 9 men; age 23-85 years) suffering from POF with 2-fluoro-2’-deoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) using a dual headed coincidence camera (DHCC). Surgery had been performed 5-94 days prior to our investigation. 13 of the 18 patients received antibiotic therapy during the time of evaluation. Ten (55%) had an infectious and eight (45%) a non infectious cause of fever. Results: Increased F-18-FDG-uptake outside the surgical wound occurred in 13 regions (infection n = 11, malignancy n = 2). The sensitivity of F-18-FDG-hybrid-camera-PET in imaging infection in areas outside the surgical wound was 86% and the specificity 100%, respectively. Antibiotic therapy did not negatively influence the results of F-18-FDG-scanning. Increased F-18-FDG-uptake within the surgical wound was seen in 8 of 18 patients. The sensitivity of F-18-FDG-hybrid-camera-PET in imaging infection within the surgical wound was 100% and the specificity 56%, respectively. The interval between surgery and F-18-FDG-scanning was significantly shorter in patients with false positive results compared with patients showing true negative results (median 34 vs. 54 days; p = 0,038). Conclusion: In POF-Patients, F-18-FDG transaxial tomography performed with a F-18-FDG-hybrid-camera-PET is sensitive in the diagnosis of inflammation and malignant disease within and outside the surgical wound. Because of the accumulation of the tracer both in granulation tissue and infection, the specificity in detecting the focus of fever within the surgical wound is poor.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Evaluation des Stellenwerts der F-18-FDG-Hybrid-Kamera-PET bei Patienten mit unklarem postoperativen Fieber (POF). Methoden: Prospektive Studie an 18 POF-Patienten (9 Frauen, 9 Männer; Alter 23-85 Jahre) mit Fluor-2’-deoxyglucose (F-18-FDG) und einer koinzidenzfähigen Doppelkopfkamera. Die chirurgischen Interventionen erfolgten 5-94 Tage vor der Untersuchung. Von den Patienten wurden zum Zeitpunkt der F-18-FDG-Hybrid-Kamera-PET 13 mit Anti-biotika therapiert. Zehn (55%) hatten eine Infektion, bei acht (45%) lag eine nicht infektiöse Fieberursache vor. Ergebnisse: Eine pathologisch erhöhte Aktivitätsaufnahme außerhalb des Wundbettes fand sich in 13 Regionen (Infektion n = 11, Tumor n = 2). Bei zwei Patienten mit Infektion fand sich ein normales Aktivitätsverteilungsmuster. Die Sensitivität der F-18-FDG-Hybrid-Kamera-PET bezogen auf Infektionen außerhalb des Operationsgebietes war 86% und die Spezifität 100%. Eine gleichzeitige antibiotische Therapie beeinflusste die diagnostische Richtigkeit der Methode nicht. Ein pathologischer FDG-Uptake innerhalb des Operationsgebietes fand sich bei 8 der 18 Patienten. Die Sensitivität der F-18-FDG-Hybrid-Kamera-PET war 100% und die Spezifität 63%. Das zeitliche Intervall zwischen Operation und F-18-FDG-Hybrid-Kamera-PET war bei falsch positivem Befund signifikant kürzer als bei richtig negativem Befund (Median 34 vs. 54 Tage; p = 0,038). Schlussfolgerung: Bei der Abklärung von POF stellt die F-18-FDG-Hybrid-Kamera-PET eine sensitive Methode zur Entzündungsdiagnostik inner- und außerhalb des Operationsgebietes dar. Die Spezifität der Methode im Operationsgebiet ist unzureichend, da nicht zwischen Anreicherung in Granulationsgewebe und infektiösen Prozess differenziert werden kann.

Keywords

F-18-FDG-PET - postoperative fever - infection

Schlüsselwörter

F-18-FDG-PET - postoperatives Fieber - Infektion
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bakheet SM, Powe J. Benign causes of 18-FDG uptake on whole body imaging. Semin Nucl Med 1998; 28: 352-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bearcroft PW, Miles KA. Leucocyte scintigraphy or computed tomography for the febrile post-operative patient?. Eur J Radiol 1996; 23: 126-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Becker W, Dölkemeyer U, Gramatzki MU, Schneider MU, Scheele J, Wolf F. Use of immunoscintigraphy in the diagnosis of fever of unknown origin. Eur J Nucl Med 1993; 20: 1078-83.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blockmans D, Knockaert D, Maes A, De Caestecker J, Stroobants S, Bobbaers H, Mortelmans L. Clinical value of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for patients with fever of unknown origin. Clin Infect Dis 2001; 32: 191-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cornelius P, Marlowe M, Pekala PH. Regulation of glucose transport by tumor necrosis factor- in cultured murine 3T3-L1 fibroblasts. J Trauma 1990; 30: S15-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Datz FL, Thorne DA. Effect of antibiotic therapy on the sensitivity of indium-111-labeled leukocyte scans. J Nucl Med 1986; 27: 1849-53.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Davies SG, Garvie NW. The role of Indium-labeled leukocyte imaging in pyrexia of unknown origin. Br J Radiol 1990; 63: 850-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 de Winter F, van de Wiele C, Vogelaers D, de Smet K, Verdonk R, Dierckx RA. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-position emission tomography: a highly accurate imaging modality for the diagnosis of chronic musculoskeletal infections. J Bone Joint Surg 2001; 83: 651-60.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Fanning J, Neuhoff RA, Brewer JE, Castaneda T, Marcotte MP, Jacobson RL. Frequency and yield of postoperative fever evaluation. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 6: 252-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Forstrom LA, Mullan BP, Hung JC, Lowe VJ, Thorson LM. 18F-FDG labelling of human leucocytes. Nucl Med Commun 2000; 21: 691-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Freischlag J, Busuttil RW. The value of postoperative fever evaluation. Surgery 1983; 94: 358-63.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fukuzumi M, Shinomiya H, Shimizu Y, Ohishi K, Utsumi S. Endotoxine-induced enhancement of glucose influx into murine peritoneal macrophages via GLUT1. Infect Immun 1996; 64: 108-12.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gamelli RL, Liu H, He LK, Hofmann CA. Augmentations of glucose uptake and glucose transporter-1 in macrophages following thermal injury and sepsis in mice. J Leucoc Biol 1996; 59: 639-47.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Gratz S, Behr TM, Herrmann A, Meller J, Conrad M, Zappel H, Becker W. Immunoscintigraphy (BW 250/183) in neonates and infants with fever of unknown origin. Nucl Med Commmun 1998; 19: 1037-45.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Haentjens M, Piepsz A, Schell-Frederick E, Perlmutter-Cremer N, Frühling J. Limitations in the use of indium-111-oxine-labeled leucocytes for the diagnosis of occult infection in children. Pediatr Radiol 1987; 17: 139-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Howard RJ. Finding the cause of postoperative fever. Postgrad Med 1989; 85: 223-6 233-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Hung GU, Shiau YC, Tsai SC, Chao TH, Ho YJ, Kao CH. Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of recurrent colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2001; 21: 1375-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Ishikawa S, Ohtaki A, Takahashi T, Sato Y, Koyano T, Hasegawa Y, Yamagishi T, Ogino T, Ohki S, Kamiyoshihara M, Morishita Y. Management of postoperative fever in cardiovascular surgery. J Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 39: 95-7.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Jorgensen FS, Sorensen CG, Kjaergaard J. Postoperative fever after major abdominal surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1988; 77: 47-50.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kelly MJ, Kalff V, Hicks RJ, Spicer WJ, Spelman DW. 111In-oxine labelled leukocyte scintigraphy in the detection and localization of active inflammation and sepsis. Med J Aust 1990; 152: 352-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Knochel JQ, Koehler PR, Lee TG, Welch DM. Diagnosis of abdominal abscesses with computed tomography, ultrasound, and in-111 leucocyte scans. Radiology 1980; 137: 425-32.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Tamahashi N, Ido T. Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulocytes studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 1972-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Larson EB, Featherstone HJ, Petersdorf MD. Fever of undetermined origin: diagnosis and follow-up of 105 cases, 1970-1980. Medicine 1982; 61: 269-92.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lehmann K, Meller J, Behe M, Becker W. F-18-FDG Uptake in Granulozyten: Basis der F-18-FDG-Szintigraphie. Nuklearmedizin 2001; 40: V168.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Lorenzen J, Buchert R, Bohuslavizki KH. Value of FDG PET in patients with fever of unknown origin. Nucl Med Commun 2001; 22: 779-83.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Lorenzen J, de Wit M, Buchert R, Igel B, Bohuslavizki KH. Granulationsgewebe: Pitfall in der Therapiekontrolle mit F-18-FDG-PET nach Chemotherapie. Nuklearmedizin 1999; 38: 333-6.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Luig H, Eschner W, Bähre M, Voth E, Nolte G. Eine iterative Strategie zur Bestimmung der Quellverteilung bei der Einzelphotonen Tomographie mit einer rotierenden Gammakamera (SPECT). Nuklearmedizin 1988; 27: 140-6.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 MacSweeney JE, Peters AM, Lavender JP. Indium labelled leucocyte scanning in pyrexia of unknown origin. Clin Radiol 1990; 42: 414-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Maisey NR, Hill ME, Webb A, Cunningham D, Flux GD, Padhani A, Ott RJ, Norman A, Bishop L. Are 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging useful in the prediction of relapse in lymphoma residual masses?. Eur J Cancer 2000; 36: 200-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Malide D, Davies-Hill TM, Levine M, Simpson IA. Distinct localisation of GLUT-1 and -5 in human monocyte-derived macrophages: effects of cell activation. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: E516-26.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 McNeil BJ, Sanders R, Alderson PO, Hessel SJ, Finberg H, Siegelman SS, Adams DF, Abrams HL. A prospective study of computed tomography, ultrasound, and gallium imaging in patients with fever. Radiology 1981; 139: 647-53.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Meller J, Ivancevic V, Conrad M, Gratz S, Munz DL, Becker W. Clinical value of immunoscintigraphy in patients with fever of unknown origin. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 1248-53.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Meller J, Altenvoerde G, Munzel U, Jauho A, Behe M, Gratz S, Luig H, Becker W. Fever of unknown origin- prospective comparison of 18 FDG-imaging with a double head coincidence camera (DHCC) and Ga-67 citrate SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 1617-25.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Meller J, Becker W. Nuklearmedizinische Diagnostik bei Fieber unklarer Genese (FUO). Nuklearmedizin 2001; 40: 59-70.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Meller J, Köster G, Liersch T, Siefker U, Lehmann K, Meyer I, Schreiber K, Altenvoerde G, Becker W. Chronic bacterial osteomyelitis – prospective comparison of 18 FDG-imaging with a double head coincidence camera (DHCC) and In-111 labeled autologous leucocytes. Eur J Nucl Med. 2002 im Druck.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Osman S, Danpure HJ. The use of 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose as a potential in vitro agent for labelling human granulocytes for clinical studies by positron emission tomography. Int J Rad Appl Instrum B 1992; 19: 183-90.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Pekala P, Marlow M, Heuvelman D, Connolly D. Regulation of hexose transport in aortic endothelial cells by vascular permeability factor and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, but not by insulin. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 18051-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Peters AM. Nuclear medicine imaging in fever of unknown origin. Q J Nucl Med 1999; 43: 61-73.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Petersdorf RG, Beeson PB. Fever of Unexplained Origin: report on 100 cases. Medicine 1961; 40: 1-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Schmidt KG, Rasmussen JW, Sørensen PG, Wedebye IM. Indium-111 Granulocyte Scintigraphy in the Evaluation of Patients with Fever of undetermined Origin. Scand J Infect Dis 1987; 19: 339-45.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sfakianakis GN, Al-Sheikh W, Heal A, Rodman G, Zeppa R, Serafini A. Comparisons of Scintigraphy With Indium-111 Leukocytes and Gallium-67 in the Diagnosis of Occult Sepsis. J Nucl Med 1982; 23: 618-26.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Stahl A, Weber WA, Avril N, Schwaiger M. Effect of N-butylscopolamine on intestinal uptake of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in PET imaging of the abdomen. Nuklearmedizin 2000; 39: 241-5.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Tudor GR, Finlay DB, Belton I. The value of indium-111-labelled leucocyt e imaging and ultrasonography in the investigation of pyrexia of unknown origin. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 918-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Weldon MJ, Joseph AE, French A, Saverymuttu SH, Maxwell JD. Comparison of 99m technetium hexamethylpropylene-amine oxime labelled leucocyte with 111-indium tropolonate labelled granulocyte scanning and ultrasound in the diagnosis of intra-abdominal abscess. Gut 1995; 37: 557-64.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar