Thromb Haemost 2000; 83(03): 412-415
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613829
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Value of Chest X-ray Combined with Perfusion Scan versus Ventilation/Perfusion Scan in Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Marco R. de Groot
1   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
,
Franktien Turkstra
1   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
,
Marinus van Marwijk Kooy
3   Department of Internal, Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
,
Ad H. J. Oostdijk
4   Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sophia Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
,
Edwin J. R. van Beek
2   Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
,
Harry R. Büller
1   Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 20 September 1999

Accepted after revision 16 November 1999

Publication Date:
14 December 2017 (online)

Summary

BackgroundThe main purpose of ventilation scanning, as adjunct to perfusion lung scintigraphy, in acute pulmonary embolism is to allow for the classification of segmental perfusion defects as mismatched, which is generally accepted as proof for the presence of pulmonary embolism. We examined whether this function of the ventilation scan could be replaced by the chest X-ray.MethodsIn 389 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and at least one segmental perfusion defect we classified the ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan and chest X-ray/perfusion (X/Q) scan as either mismatched or matched. Furthermore we analyzed whether this comparison was different in subgroups of patients with concomitant congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Results Overall agreement between the X/Q and V/Q scan diagnostic category was found in 341 of 389 patients (88%; 95% CI 84-92%). The positive predictive value for obtaining a mismatched V/Q scan result in case of a mismatched X/Q scan result was 86% (95% CI 81-90%). If the X/Q scan yielded only matched defects the V/Q scan resulted in the same classification in 90% (95% CI 85-95%). Analysis of the small subgroup of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease showed that a mismatched X/Q scan was confirmed by V/Q scanning in 21 of 34 cases (62%; 95% CI 45-78%).ConclusionThis study shows that in the great majority of patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism combination of chest X-ray with perfusion scintigraphy reliably replaced ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy in defining (mis)-matching of segmental perfusion defects. These results need confirmation before the chest X-ray can fully obviate the use of ventilation scintigraphy.

 
  • References

  • 1 Silverstein MD, Heit HA, Mohr DN, Petterson TM, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ. Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 585-93.
  • 2 Anderson Jr FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, Hosmer DW, Patwardhan NA, Jovanovic B, Forcier A, Dalen JE. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: The Worcestor DVT study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 933-8.
  • 3 Fennerty T. The diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. BMJ 1997; 314: 425-9.
  • 4 Goldhaber SZ. Pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 93-104.
  • 5 PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. JAMA 1990; 263: 2753-9.
  • 6 Juni JE, Alavi A. Lung scanning in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: The emperor readressed. Sem Nucl Med 1991; 21: 281-96.
  • 7 Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, Jay RM, Dodd PE, Ockelford PA, Coates G, Gill GJ, Turpie AG, Doyle DJ, Büller Raskob GE. Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Int Med 1983; 98: 891-9.
  • 8 New York Heart Association: »Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessels. 8th ed. Little, Brown and Company; Boston: 1979
  • 9 Siafakas NM, Vermeire P, Pride NB, Paoletti P, Gibson J, Howard P, Yemault JC, Decramer M, Higenbottam T, Postma DS. Optimal assessment and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A consensus statement of the European respiratory society. Eur Resp J 1995; 08: 1398-420.
  • 10 Stein PD, Terrin ML, Gottschalk A, Alavi A, Henry JW. Value of ventilation/perfusion scans versus perfusion scan alone in acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1239-41.
  • 11 Miniati M, Pistolesi M, Marini C, Di Rocco M, Formichi B, Prediletto R, Allescia G, Tonelli L, Sostman HD, Giuntini C. Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigative study of acute pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PISA-PED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154: 1387-93.
  • 12 Van Beek EJR, Schenk ED, Michel BC, Van den Ende B, Brandjes DPM, Van der Heide YT, Bossuyt PMM, Büller HR. The role of plasma D-dimer concentration in the exclusion of pulmonary embolism. Br J Haem 1996; 92: 725-32.
  • 13 Perrier A, Bounameaux H, Morabia A, De Moerloose P, Slosman D, Didier D, Unger PF, Junod A. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a decision analysis-based strategy including clinical probability, D-dimer levels, and ultrasonography: a management study. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 531-6.
  • 14 Turkstra F, Van Beek EJR, Ten Cate JW, Büller HR. Reliable rapid blood test for the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in symptomatic outpatients. Thromb Haemost 1996; 76: 9-11.