Evaluation of a Russell’s viper venom-based protein C assay

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

Facebook Linkedin Weibo

Thromb Haemost 2004; 92(02): 430-431
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1613734

Letters to the Editor

Schattauer GmbH

Michele M. Flanders

¹ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP Laboratories

,

George M. Rodgers

¹ARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP Laboratories

²Departments of Medicine and Pathology, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Further Information

Publication History

Received 16 March 2004

Accepted after revision 11 May 2004

Publication Date:
15 December 2017 (online)

References
1 Kottke-Marchant K, Comp P. Laboratory issues in diagnosing abnormalities of protein C, thrombomodulin, and endothelial cell protein C receptor. College of American Pathologists Consensus Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126: 1337-1348.

MissingFormLabel
PubMed Search in Google Scholar
2 Marlar A, Adcock D. Clinical evaluation of protein C: A comparative review of antigenic and functional assays. Human Pathology 1989; 20: 1040-1047.

MissingFormLabel
Crossref PubMed Search in Google Scholar
3 DeMoerloose P, Reber G, Bouvier C. Spuriously low levels of protein C with Protac activation clotting assay. Thromb Haemost 1988; 59: 543.

MissingFormLabel
Thieme Connect PubMed Search in Google Scholar
4 Martin R. General Deming regression for estimating systemic bias and its confidence interval in method-comparison studies. Clin Chem 2000; 46: 100-104.

MissingFormLabel
PubMed Search in Google Scholar