J Knee Surg 2018; 31(01): 013-016
DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1608820
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Gap-Balancing versus Measured Resection Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison Study

Jessica L. Churchill
1   Department of Orthopedics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Anton Khlopas
2   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Assem A. Sultan
1   Department of Orthopedics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
,
Steven F. Harwin
3   Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai West, New York, New York
,
Michael A. Mont
1   Department of Orthopedics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

25. September 2017

15. Oktober 2017

Publikationsdatum:
27. November 2017 (online)

Abstract

Proper femoral component alignment in the axial plane during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on accurate bone cuts and soft tissue balancing. Two methods that are used to achieve this are “measured resection” and “gap balancing.” However, a controversy exists as to which method is more accurate and leads to better outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate: (1) implant survivorship, (2) patient outcomes, (3) complications, and (4) radiographic analysis comparing patients who underwent TKA with either gap-balancing or measured resection techniques. A total of 214 consecutive patients (221 knees) underwent primary TKA by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2012. Component alignment was achieved by using measured resection in 116 knees and gap balancing was used in 105 knees. The patients had a mean age of 66 years (range, 44–86 years) and a mean body mass index of 32 kg/m2 (range, 22–52 kg/m2). Patient range-of-motion (ROM) and Knee Society (KS) function and pain scores, and radiographic assessment, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at ∼6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, and then annually. The mean follow-up time was 3 years. A Kaplan–Meier's analysis was performed to calculate the survivorship. The aseptic survivorship was 98% in both the measured resection and gap-balancing groups. The mean ROM was not significantly different between the measured resection and gap-balancing groups (123 vs. 123 degrees, p = 0.990). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the KS function scores (86 vs. 85 points, p = 0.829) or the KS pain scores (93 vs. 92 points, p = 0.425). Otherwise, the radiographic evaluation at latest follow-up did not demonstrate any evidence of progressive radiolucencies or loosening, of any prosthesis. The results of this study found that at a mean follow-up of 3 years, both the measured resection and gap-balancing techniques achieved excellent survivorship and postoperative outcomes. This demonstrates that both methods can be used to achieve accurate femoral component alignment with similar short-term outcomes.

 
  • References

  • 1 Huizinga MR, Brouwer RW, Bisschop R, van der Veen HC, van den Akker-Scheek I, van Raay JJ. Long-term follow-up of anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty: a 15- to 20-year survival analysis. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (06) 1190-1195
  • 2 Karachalios T, Varitimidis S, Bargiotas K, Hantes M, Roidis N, Malizos KN. An 11- to 15-year clinical outcome study of the advance medial pivot total knee arthroplasty: pivot knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (08) 1050-1055
  • 3 Moon Y-W, Kim H-J, Ahn H-S, Park C-D, Lee D-H. Comparison of soft tissue balancing, femoral component rotation, and joint line change between the gap balancing and measured resection techniques in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (39) e5006
  • 4 Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KDJ. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (01) 57-63
  • 5 Sheth NP, Husain A, Nelson CL. Surgical techniques for total knee arthroplasty: measured resection, gap balancing, and hybrid. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017; 25 (07) 499-508
  • 6 Hohman Jr DW, Nodzo SR, Phillips M, Fitz W. The implications of mechanical alignment on soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2015; 23 (12) 3632-3636
  • 7 Hampp EL, Chughtai M, Scholl LY, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky DJ, Mont MA. Robotic-arm assisted total nnee arthroplasty demonstrated improved accuracy and precision compared to manual technique. Poster presented at: Orthopaedic Research Society; 2017 March 19-22; San Diego, CA
  • 8 Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Hampp EL. , et al. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated soft tissue protection. Surg Technol Int 2017; 30: 441-446
  • 9 Daines BK, Dennis DA. Gap balancing vs. measured resection technique in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2014; 6 (01) 1-8
  • 10 Springer BD, Parratte S, Abdel MP. Measured resection versus gap balancing for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (07) 2016-2022
  • 11 Scott WN. Insall & Scott Surgery of the Knee, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Church Livingstone/Elsevier; 2006
  • 12 Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Kim RH, Sharma A. Gap balancing versus measured resection technique for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010; 468 (01) 102-107
  • 13 Babazadeh S, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD, Choong PF. Gap balancing sacrifices joint-line maintenance to improve gap symmetry: a randomized controlled trial comparing gap balancing and measured resection. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (05) 950-954
  • 14 Meneghini RM, Mont MA, Backstein DB, Bourne RB, Dennis DA, Scuderi GR. Development of a modern knee society radiographic evaluation system and methodology for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015; 30 (12) 2311-2314
  • 15 Laskin RS. Flexion space configuration in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10 (05) 657-660
  • 16 Boldt JG, Stiehl JB, Hodler J, Zanetti M, Munzinger U. Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2006; 30 (05) 420-425
  • 17 Teeter MG, Perry KI, Yuan X, Howard JL, Lanting BA. Contact kinematic differences between gap balanced vs measured resection techniques for single radius posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32 (06) 1834-1838
  • 18 Luyckx T, Peeters T, Vandenneucker H, Victor J, Bellemans J. Is adapted measured resection superior to gap-balancing in determining femoral component rotation in total knee replacement?. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94 (09) 1271-1276
  • 19 Tigani D, Sabbioni G, Ben Ayad R, Filanti M, Rani N, Del Piccolo N. Comparison between two computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: gap-balancing versus measured resection technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010; 18 (10) 1304-1310
  • 20 Sabbioni G, Rani N, Del Piccolo N, Ben Ayad R, Carubbi C, Tigani D. Gap balancing versus measured resection technique using a mobile-bearing prosthesis in computer-assisted surgery. Musculoskelet Surg 2011; 95 (01) 25-30
  • 21 Lee HJ, Lee JS, Jung HJ, Song KS, Yang JJ, Park CW. Comparison of joint line position changes after primary bilateral total knee arthroplasty performed using the navigation-assisted measured gap resection or gap balancing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (12) 2027-2032
  • 22 Katz MA, Beck TD, Silber JS, Seldes RM, Lotke PA. Determining femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: reliability of techniques. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (03) 301-305
  • 23 Dennis DA. Measured resection: an outdated technique in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2008; 31 (09) 940-944